CAT S60

Le rugged hype (C)

File: cats60thermalimage1-540x334.png (225KB, 540x334px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 540x334px

>>58892507
Unless you can name another phone I can temp their bloody face with after giving them a phone flogging, yes.

the betas like it, it's rugged (TM)

Wouldn't it be easier to just throw a samsung phone at them and blow their face off?

>>58892628
Well sure but then you no longer have a phone

>>58892530
to be honest the FLIR camera is fucking neat as hell and might have some real potential in emergency search-and-rescue fields and the like

>>58892507
lumia 635

>>58892742
I wouldn't buy one of those phones but the FLIR camera is cool. With the new meme being dual back cameras I wish manufacturers would make one of them IR.

File: 1462117971891.jpg (84KB, 371x371px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 371x371px

Rumour I heard is the feds have been worrying about this phone ending up in the hands of terrorists to make makeship thermal sniper rifles to take people out at night.

How feasible would this be anyway? Would you just point the flir camera at your scope and magically get thermal vision?

>>58892861
If you point a FLIR camera at glass you'll get the temp of the glass, not what's behind the glass.

>>58892861
>How feasible would this be anyway? Would you just point the flir camera at your scope and magically get thermal vision?
not at all feasible because IR doesn't work like that

>>58892861
That would be fucking stupid. For the cost of this phone and a scope you could buy a scope with thermal built in. You know FLIR makes those right?

>>58892861
this is why i keep the temperature of my home right at 99

File: 1_JTK98qw7e987eTWeq.jpg (27KB, 371x214px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 371x214px

>>58892897
>>58892924
ohhh no wonder thermal flir images of people wearing sunglasses looks cool...

>>58892970
mmm that's too hot

File: flir_20160902T131958.jpg (261KB, 435x326px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 435x326px

It's a neat phone, but I feel like the camera and flir sensor are too vulnerable.

t. guy with a scratched up flir sensor

>>58892507
just get an old nokia you faggot

>>58892861
us govt restricts sale of flir cameras with a frequency of more than like 10Hz because of this

>>58892628
underrated

>>58892507
>>58892577
Pretty sure sonim builds stuff like that, too.
So, unless I wanted a thermal cam, I'd go for another phone.

>Non-removable Li-Ion 3800 mAh battery

fucking dropped.

>>58896319
It's okay if you drop it, look at how rugged that beast is

>>58895586
Your government is silly.

File: 1461898164191009.jpg (238KB, 1800x889px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1800x889px

BV6000 is quite popular on low end spectrum

http://business.panasonic.co.uk/computer-product/toughpad/FZ-X1

these seem pretty good

Oukitel K10000 is pointier and heavier.

>>58892507
I had an old CAT smartphone. It was shit. It wasn't """"""""""""rugged""""""""""""" at all.

File: th.jpg (19KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 250x250px

tbqh my $50 Lumia 640 is quite rugged. reminds me a lot of Nokia because it's mostly becaues of the plastic that it can take a beeting.

>>58892507

I always wanted to take IR nude selfies.

>>58892507

> be a construction/general industrial company
> decide to buy employees a phone
> this one actually may come in handy compared to everything else

that's the point of this phone

>>58899488
I want one but I'm in the US and it's hardware is pretty old by now

>>58892577
Body temp, dilation, blood pulse etc. are not good indication that the person is lying.

>>58900533
Where did I say anything about using a fucking FLIR camera as a polygraph? Where did I say anything at all about lying?

Other rugged phones have shit battery and shit internals and have a bad screen. I have been waiting for something actually rugged and good to come along. Temp camera is actually pretty damn cool and useful.

>>58892507
>glove and wet-finger compatible
resistive touch making a comeback?

>>58896802
>BV6000
whoa. those look breddy gud and mucho affordable.

Is a candybar-style smartphone really ideal for a "fugged" phone anyway?

>>58895586
really? haha, what a bunch of fags