RX 470 vs GTX 1060

the RX 470 is 209 Eur.

gtx 1060
/thread

>>58879477
But /g/ said......

>>58879492
But AMD is....

>>58879582
>>58879573
>>58879557
>cherry picking

Couldn't afford 480, got 460 4G, actually really happy with it.

>>58879600
Only 1 of those games is a DX12 game amd nvideo is still fucking dogshit.

Yeah these are cherry picked but they reveal a horrifying truth that AMD cards are only gonna get better.

t. ex nvidiot who sold his 970 and and got a an Rx 480 with legitimately 4GB of gddr5 vram.

>>58879640
I couldn't give a fuck of a shit about DX11, I'm sticking with Win 7.

>>58879648
DX12***

>>58879648
THATS the thing though, amd is shitting all over nvidia in DX11 titles (windows 7). That's bad, really bad.

Did you know that nvidia cards lack full hardware async compute?

>>58879655
oman, you've really pushed me into a corner.
Fuck me.

>>58879444
>From what I've seen.... the 1060 is considerably faster.
The 1060 6GB is, but the 3GB model you are looking at has less cores making it significantly slower. 1060 6gb ≈ RX480 > RX470 >>> 1060 3gb

>>58879803
>1060 6gb ≈ RX480
lolno, ses
>>58879557
>>58879573
>>58879582

>>58879831
They're within 5% of each other in most cases. You could buy either or and be satisfied. Basically just pick whichever you can get cheapest/ whichever has a good overclocking version at the best price.

File: d0ca80220c0e81d6203586fc3e15ef4b.jpg (64KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1000x1000px

>>58879831
talking about wider range of benchmarks you mong

File: Screenshot_20170210-021955(1).jpg (232KB, 713x1040px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 713x1040px

>>58879879
rx 480 it is then...

>>58879893
I could post the other 10 benchmarks where the rx 480 shits all over the 1060 but then you'd call me a shill woudn't you?

benis