THANK YOU BASED INTEL

All yours for the low, low price of $1200 :^)

>>58872156
>implying Moore's law has anything to do with processing/benchmark speeds
>thinking 15 % is anywhere close to Moore's law even if it were

>15% better performance on sysmark
...and 1% in real world applications.

File: 1486275222031.png (139KB, 228x260px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 228x260px

>>58872156
>Fine print litteraly admits the benchmarking software is biased towards Intel

>>58872218
>>58872236
Meanwhile AMD releases processors that have slower single thread speed and more cores.

>>58872156
I don't think a 15% increase is worth the probability the price will be $700+ compared to today's 7th gen CPUs, which will probably get a price decrease when Gen 8 comes out.

>>58872289
Nobody said anything about AMD.

>>58872240
It's only comparing Intel, moron.

>15%2

2=op is faggot

>>58872156
>tfw 2600k is almost has good than the new shit in real world applications

I thought 8th Gen was planned for October?

>>58872522
>Almost as good
>35% slower in games
What did he mean by this?

>>58872289
>tfw projecting so hard you could work in a movie theatre

>>58872597
>35% slower in games

[citation needed]

>>58872156
I got a 14nm x5-z8300. Good enough.

File: watch doge 2.png (42KB, 806x583px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 806x583px

>>58872664

>Forecasts are Intel estimates, based upon current expectations and available information and are subject to change without notice.

>>58872791
>whoops, seems like our expectations were a bit too high and we had to correct the numbers down, truly sorry about that
>thanks for all the preorders though lol

WAIT EVEN THE NEXT GENERATION SI GOING TO BE ON 14NM????

Jesus Christ intel really fucked up. Both TSMC and Samsung will be selling 10nm SoC by the end of the third quarter.

Doesn't sysmark test the GPU?

Anyhow, 15% from Skylake to Kabylake just proves what a worthless sack of shit the benchmark is since you can end up with higher temps and power consumption with Kabylake if you get a bad silicon batch.

>>58872661
It's true. AMD fell for the more cores meme. Mediatek also fell for this meme.

>>58872927
Fascinating, that's why Intel has a 10 core consumer chip out for almost a year and released a 24 core chip a day ago.

>>58872950

Call me when these make sense in a consumer build.

>>58872156
>7th gen core i7 15% better than 6th gen

This is an outright lie.

>>58872985
They do, just not enough sense for someone who only shitposts on 4ching and plays console ports.

>>58872994
GPU IS 15% BETTER THEY DIDN'T LIE

>>58872950
"Consumer"

>>58873032
Intel's HEDT line is consumer no matter how poor you are.

>>58872999
>10 core consumer chip

Yeah? Please enlighten me as to what exactly the i7-6950X offers to a consumer compared to a 6700k/7700k. I'll wait.

>>58873060
About 2.3 times the throughput and double the bandwidth and I/O

>>58873060
6 more cores. Duh. Don't be stupid

>>58873078
>buzzowords

>>58873153

>technical specifications are buzzwords

You're out of your containment board. >>>/v/

>>58873153
Dumb /v/ermin.

>>58873078

And what difference does that make - for the consumer - in real world applications?
Because spending $1400 extra to rape some synthetic benchmarks isn't typical consumer behavior no matter how you stretch it, difference in most of the applications will be negligible, and it will underperform the 7700k in the vast majority games, and that is just about the end of what normies care about.

>>58873209
You think consumers are just normalfags who browse facebook? Consumers are also graphic designers, private webservers and mail servers, scientists & other number crunchers, web crawlers, parsers, etc etc
Which pretty much all need all the cores and bandwidth and memory they can get.

>>58873298
Not to mention of course video editing. With the prevalence of cheap 4K cameras, drones with HD cameras, GoPros, even emerging 8K cameras, that footage requires a lot of processing, and more cores will always do it faster.

DED
>DED
DED

http://www.forbes.com/sites/antonyleather/2017/02/09/amd-ryzen-prices-revealed-massive-blow-to-intel/#c8d05236e7c2

>>58873346
>>58873298
Basically any serious work benefits from more cores while game engines are still stuck in 2007.

>>58873395
>while game engines are still stuck in 2007.
Some devs have actually competent coders.

>>58872156
Do they even know what Moore's law is about?
Goddamnit Intel

>>58873448
That's the exception, not the rule.

>>58873472
Of course they don't, it's not like Moore himself is a honorary chief at Intel or something.

Durfhurf

>>58872218
Why is her ass so flat?

>>58873672
Why is your p0n0s so small?

>http://www.anandtech.com/show/11112/intel-to-equip-fab-42-for-7-nm
Does GloFo have a 7nm process already?

>>58873780
Yes, they had it since they bough IBM foundry business.

>>58872191
*$1700 muh goyim

>>58873780
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/47301.wss
http://www.globalfoundries.com/newsroom/press-releases/2016/09/14/globalfoundries-extends-roadmap-to-deliver-industry-s-leading-performance-offering-of-7nm-finfet-technology

They start bringing the node online later this year.

>15% increase from 6th gen to 7th gen
How Indian do you have to be deny reality?

File: 1486423582707.jpg (74KB, 500x888px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 500x888px

>>58873672
this. doesn't matter how much string you pull up her ass. that ass is flat.
>>58872156
THANK YOU BASED INTEL FOR CHARGING ME ANOTHER ME MY FIRST BORN FOR 1% PERFORMANCE GAIN.

>>58872812
No one's even sure if this is Coffee Lake either. That was a planned 14nm desktop line with Cannonlake being a simultaneous 10nm mobile line.

So there might be one more 14nm desktop line after this.

>>58874166
Its not Coffee Lake yet, thats 2018. The upcoming 14nm line they're referring to is Kaby Lake-X on socket 2066.

>>58874257
Nah that's confirmed to have gen 7 branding.

>>58874363
A 6 core Coffee Lake chip would score higher than a paltry 15% in the synthetic Sysmark. AMD used Sysmark and PCMark8 to show major double digit performance increases with minor clock bumps with their APUs like Trinity and Richland. So that 15% uplift there is pretty telling, it looks like nothing but a clock bump, or a clock bump and faster memory.

>>58873354
wtf i hate intel now

>>58872236
Intel has always had the benchmarks in their pocket. This is an old strategy of theirs.

>>58873354
Forbes referencing wccftech? Fucking kek

pretty sure its the i7 7740K kaby lake-x, they fixed the problem with the TIM and now takes advantage you get from deliding the an extra -30c and has a higher clock speed ... in other words WHAT IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THEE FIRST PLACE not some garbage 1% over skylake

File: fugggg.jpg (58KB, 592x588px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 592x588px

>Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors.

File: 1469877426690.png (124KB, 358x272px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 358x272px

>>58872156
>It's the same """"""15%"""""" as with Sky- vs. Kaby Lake

Dropped