When the hell did they get so damn cheap so quickly and why?

They are limited in features, build quality is bad, and they require a SIM for most features. Sad thing is, they only support 2G as well, so that SIM service is bad.

Its okay if you want it for the flashy "look at me I have a smart watch", but if you're someone who gets emails, and texts that are important, spring for a "real" smart watch.

You can find a Gen1 Moto 360 for around $80, and a Gen 2 for $200.

>>58869150
Smartwatches were a mistake.

>>58869213
Adding onto this, the camera is a poor excuse for a camera.
>2MP
In reality its about 0.3MP. Terrible, and useless.
>"Muh watch has a camura"

>>58869239
Who the fuck thought putting a camera on a fucking watch was a passable cogent idea?

>wearing a watch
>having sweaty garbage under it
nigga I've been free of this dirt for decades

>>58869269
No idea. I used a $15 "smart watch" (DZ09) and it just didn't cut it.
I will say, the ONLY "good" thing was the ability to take and make calls from the watch. It had a decent microphone, and speaker built in.

>>58869269
Marketing. The camera is probably dirt cheap and they think it will be worth the sales from retards who want a watch camera.

>>58869150
Those who wanted a gadget that needs to be charged every 30 minutes were too few.

>>58869150
These things are so fucking autistic

They should of stayed in spy movies

File: 1484692857761.jpg (37KB, 277x349px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 277x349px

>>58870048
>should of