Wine or Mono?

>>58847757
Wine is what I use, but I've never looked into mono too hard.

>>58847757
>Comparing Wine and Mono
???
Mono is just for MS .NET programs
Wine is for full Windows programs and even supports .NET anyway

The only real use for mono is that it allows .NET programs to run natively on Linux

>>58847757
>that stale bait

>>58847862
>Linux
Any platform you faggot

>>58847872
>using any platform but linux

>>58847872
What other platforms are there besides Windings and Loonix?

>>58847757
the logo looks like a penis
or a pile of shit
fitting either way

>>58847757
What the fuck are you even talking about? Mono is just an open source C# .NET implementation whereas Wine allows you to run Windows applications.

>>58847862
>>58848384
Looks like OPs got a couple bites.

>>58847965
>>58847968
>this is the level of tech illiterates typically found on /g/
kek

>>58847757
Mono is open source .Net, nothing to do with Wine a reimplementation of Windows APIs. I use Mono all the time (on both Windows and Linux), but, while I appreciate their efforts, have only experienced headaches with Wine.

>>58848556

How is >>58847965 tech illiterate?

>>58848756
>autistm
>the post and the anon

>>58848756
Because the thinks that Linux is a viable option for everything, it's a good embedded and server OS, but not even close to being a proper desktop or productivity OS.

Wine and Mono are not in competition, because they do not run the same types of applications. Wine runs native Win32 applications, while Mono runs .NET applications. When Wine is given a .NET executable, it passes the buck off to Mono for the most part.