LINUXFAGS BTFO

>fosdem

File: osoutlook.png (200KB, 1385x945px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1385x945px

Reminder.

>there's a vulnerability
>you report it
>the next day there's a fix to DL

>>58821976
This. It's hilarious how wintoddlers still don't understand this.

>>58821976
/thread

File: pajeet-laughing.jpg (100KB, 870x1390px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 870x1390px

>>58821942
HAHAHAHAHAH LOONIXFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>58821976
How will pajeet respond to this?

>>58821975
2 1 4 s a m p l e s
1
4
s
am
p\l
le
s

>>58821942
it's a well known fact that linux is better than NT but desktop GNU/Linux isn't necessarily better than windows. after all, you're trusting a ton of potentially incompetent parties with your security on the latter.

the main difference, and the reason why security experts will never recommend windows over linux for opsec, is that you CAN design a full linux system around security and prove that it is, indeed, secure. on windows, such a feat is impossible by nature.

in any case, you shouldn't rely on a single package on a 4 year old distro to make an obvious point, because that's fucking stupid and wrong.

File: file.png (17KB, 1208x500px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 1208x500px

kek

>>58822176
>after all, you're trusting a ton of potentially incompetent parties with your security on the latter.
no, you trust your distro, the quality it stands for, and it's maintainers. thats the reason only debian and rhel/centos are used in the real world

>in any case, you shouldn't rely on a single package on a 4 year old distro
why ? 4 years is nothing. every serious distro should still provide security updates after 4 years

>>58821976
This

>aslr
Debian was slow to add it because it breaks some software and Debian devs are fanatic when it comes to stability

File: sdfcsf.png (219KB, 1480x697px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1480x697px

>>58821942
What Did You Mean By This.

>>58822034
>>58822136
>>>/pol/

>>58822707
All this time being butthurt pajeet you could have spent training how to use the loo.

>>58821975
>2014
>estimates
>less than 1000 devices included in "research"
Low IQ microchimp detected

>>58822172
>>58822729
MAXIMUM DAMAGE CONTROL

>>58822997
XDDDDD

>>58822176
This is wrong, Linux has almost no anti exploitation features compared to windows. Windows is actually innovating, creating things like cfg and secure kernel. EMET is extremely hard to exploit on.
Linux barely even has support for aslr

>>58821975

I have microsoft in my office because the canadian fucks who make our software force ms sql.

>>58823209
>What is grsecurity

Also KASLR implementation is quite late in Linux but it's not that bad, as Windows is quite vulnerable as well.

Some intresting stuff to read:

https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/kaslr-bypass-mitigations-windows-81/index.html

https://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-16/materials/us-16-Jang-Breaking-Kernel-Address-Space-Layout-Randomization-KASLR-With-Intel-TSX-wp.pdf

>>58823311
>grsecurity
>autistic devs that ban people for pointing out bugs in it
Wew.

>>58821942
>linux desktop
linux is a kernel, not a de

fucking computer illiterates

>>58821975
Higher marketshare != better

>>58823528

In capitalism, higher marketshare == better.

Stay mad.

>>58821942

>not having the antivirus software Common Sense 2017 to protect your information

who cares

>>58823592
Then android is the best. Good to know. prof. economics.

File: ms_shills.jpg (4MB, 6024x5624px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 6024x5624px

>>58822311
it's called paid shilling.

>>58821942
>Linuxfags on suicide watch.
>mentioning fixed bugs
>i'm on suicide watch
Is it 2016?

>>58823796
It is then. Capitalism rewards excellence.

>>58824168
>Capitalism rewards excellence
This is the biggest lie capitalcucks have made up. It rewards popularity, not excellence.

>>58824168
>Capitalism rewards excellence
you mean all the shit that pushed away better alternatives thanks to shilling and propaganda?

>>58823592
But Windows has had a long advantage in time. Plus, people afraid to try new things. The very thought that "since Windows has more marketshare, it must be better" is exactly the reason Linux can't get more marketshare.

Besides, when you Google "server os" it shows a shopping list full of Windows servers operating systems. They probably just click the first result without looking.

File: bing.png (91KB, 894x435px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 894x435px

>>58824354
Google gave me freenas and linux. Bing on the pic.

>>58824457
>macOS server
Is this a real thing? Sounds terrible

>>58821976
>>there's a vulnerability
Why?
A more secure system is not the one with least flaws and weakness? Ok, you report and the fix come, but couldn't it have been written better?

>>58825423
It's mediocre hardware that looks cool and cost a lot of money. It has it's niche.

Does this affect chrome os?

>>58825568
What niche would that be? I'm struggling to think of anything besides wanting to show people how cool and "tech savy" you are but you're a macfag and can't have something unfashionable in your house or you'll spontaneously combust.

>>58825747
If your company has too many excess funds and you need to lower your taxes

>>58822707
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggm1skZkthY

>>58825747
Imagine the consulting office of say, a gay,hipster,architect.

>>58825549
>no mistakes will ever be made, ever