Is quad-core the new dual-core?

inb4 they build a system to report 1 core with two threads as 4 physical cores

>>58821100
>Their budget r3's and r5's are actually running at lower frequencies than r7

It's like AMD wants to lose this fight. Their fucking budget CPU's with lower IPC than Sky and Kaby will be literally 1 to 1.5Ghz behind Kabylake's 7600k and 7700k. It's literally DOA.

>>58821100
So what's the difference between the 8-core CPU's?

>>58821131
Probably frequencies and some useless like shit like iGPUs.

>>58821100
No
hyperthreaded dual core is the new dual core poorfag meme

>>58821100
12-core master race

File: image.png (358KB, 552x543px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 552x543px

>Every AMD CPU needs 2 or 4 extra cores to match a comparable Intel CPU
>7500 being the competition of a quad core hyperthreaded decently clocked zen CPU

>>58821133
these are all cpus, anon. None of them have igpus. AMD calls those things apus.

>>58821133
All OC features and AI prediction stuff(mostlikely) will be available across all chips and have no iGPUs. Really, it all comes down to single core performance and price.