What cpu is that?

AMD Athlon

HP PA-RISC

>>58810964
a amd athlon, flip it over so we can see the pins

>>58810964
AMD Athlon XP 2500+

>>58811093
How did you know it?

>>58811196
The part number is on the black label: AXDA2500DKV4D

File: 1486324578875.jpg (1MB, 1920x2087px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x2087px

>>58811196

>>58810964
Athlon XP 2500 as >>58811093 says. Based on the size of the die, it should be the Barton core with 512 KB L2 cache.

>>58810964
I've got 3 like that even a Duron

>>58810964
A broken AMD, Athlon XP

>>58810964
What you'r referring to as "CPU" is in fact CPU plus Semen

>>58812017
Those are quite because manipulating the bridges on top allows you to reconfigure stuff that is hard-fused on more recent CPUs.

You can turn them into mobile variant with frequency scaling and you can make them into Athlon MP (dual-cpu capable). I wish I had dual socket 462 board for that fun, that would be nice (though not worth investing in, obviously).

>>58811093
if you were lucky you could just increase the multiplier into a 3200+ without much vcore increase.

>>58812186
Not multiplier. What was used there was raising FSB. The top 3200+ SKU (real fequency 2,2 GHz) had 400MHz FSB, while the 2500+ SKU (1,8 GHz or so) had 333 MHz FSB. Motherboards usually supported both if they weren't old, so increasing it was completely safe, provided the chip was stable at 2,2 GHz. And lot's of them were.

File: KL_Hewlett_Packard_PA8000.jpg (230KB, 1024x1017px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1024x1017px

>>58810992
AMD will never make something so understatedly nice

>>58813709
How about Am29000? (Although yeah, PA-RISC was another level of HW beastlyness)