IMAGE ORGANIZER

>Saving many images

But why. Are you going to pass your harddrive down to your children?

>>58790538
>But why. Are you going to pass your harddrive down to your children?
I have autism.

I may live forever if technology advances enough.

>>58790516
>What would also be nice is software that lets me search images by the majority color that is in the image so I can find images based on what my brain remembers the colors are.

>"Computer, search for beige."

>>58790632
>>"Computer, search for beige."
Exactly. It would search for images that have that image as the majority color.

How many images do you have? It's probably not what you're looking for, but maybe something like uploading everything to a private flickr account would work. They have a lot of search filter options (colour included)

>>58790710
>upload to jew media account when I just want to organize my files on my computer
why?

>>58790757
Because you're asking for machine learning style search and image recognition capabilities not just organization.

Get this garbage if you want color http://appnee.com/imagesorter/

>>58790660
How would you ever search for porn?

>>58790850
>http://appnee.com/imagesorter/
Hooly shit is program is unbelievably amazing

would like a tag program that also has this color feature though

File: how the fuck.png (709KB, 1091x822px) Image search: [Google]

709KB, 1091x822px

>>58790904
>>58790850
like seriously

all my alices are right here.

how the fuck did you even do that you sneaky bastard?

>>58790516
ACDSee

>>58790904
>>58790922
A simple Google search based on that guys post about color? Did you guys even try?

Anyway tagging images seems stupid unless it somehow embeds the tag in the image metadata that is also accessible by other software. If you spent all that time tagging then switched programs one day it would suck otherwise.

>>58791023
I want to be able to click choose file on 4chan and my OS to pop up a file selector that has the ability to search through tags I have created plus the ability to search through files based on their color, shape and other attributes.

Why hasn't this been created yet.

FUCK COMPUTERS

FUCK THE JEWS

>>58791023
Baloo (From KDE) was intended to do just that, but now you're faced with the problem that some file systems don't support that metadata. I'm pretty sure FAT32 and NTFS don't, which means putting the files on a typical flash drive or Windows destroys all the existing tags.

I always rename my pictures to "cat meme arrows shocked nyan pussy" and stuff like this and just use the build-in search in every explorer-window I am in my picturesfolder. This also works with the file-upload window. The only problem is these stupid filenames but anyways who gives a shit.

>>58791023
This is why you embed the tags in the filename.

Then write your own file open dialog that transparently removes the tags when uploaded.

>he still depends on the Windows shell dialogs.
>laughingGabeStallman

File: imgorg.png (2MB, 1920x984px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x984px

>he isn't writing his own

File: 1483501477672.jpg (20KB, 226x225px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 226x225px

>hydrus is bad
LOL how bad at computers do you have to be

>>58790516
>Hydrus is fucking garbage and unnecessarily overcomplicated.
Grow up and read the documentation
>I "imported" my windows downloads folder and it said I ran out of hard drive space but it wouldn't let me cancel the fucking import.
Because Hydrus doesn't delete your original files until after a successful import.

>>58790516
>Hydrus is fucking garbage and unnecessarily overcomplicated.
In your use case, maybe

Remember, it's a locally stored sqlite database that stores images alongside the program's install directory, or wherever you've set your 'file storage locations'

It's power user software mostly

I just put tags in the name of the file so then the search brings them up straight away

>>58795543
I put mine in exif

>>58790538
>But why. Are you going to pass your harddrive down to your children?
Because I want to look at the images later?

>>58795572
What about PNGs?