Why dont we just make a browser

>>58783966

its a bitch and takes a long time to reach standard security standards. Just let Google keep optimizing Chrome. In 10-15 years your browser will replace your OS, and will be able to run games big league.

>>58783966
Because a web broswer is a ridiculously complicated piece of software, and nobody needs "webkit with a shitty GUI tacked on #1256".

>>58783966
I can work on the logo.

Current browsers aren't the problem, it's the world wide web that's become shitty. But just for fun OP, what would you like to see in your ideal browser?

File: moss.jpg (18KB, 180x200px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 180x200px

>>58783981
>standard security standards

>>58783966
>>58780002

>>58783981
>standards
Yeah because of course you need to run every piece of software by Standardizing Agencies (read: scams) in order to share it.

>Google
Enjoy being one with the botnet, Fletcher. How's Java 101 treating you? Planning out your next Chrome script yet?

>run games
Kill yourself.

>>58783995
I'll make a second one so we can choose.

>>58784095
I'll make a fork of the browser, based on my preference for the losing logo and market that browser as being an optimized, and more cutting-edge version of the other browser.

File: browserlogo.png (11KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 400x400px

Rate my logo

>>58784157

The name is better than the logo.

>>58784125
Then let us use the same logo twice, but for the forked browser we'll have a flat version that only has 2 colors.

>>58783966
>we
always means "not me"

>>58784157
ugly
just let the actual art students design it

>>58783981
>big league

>>58784175
I like the idea, but I don't like that you're taking my fork away. I think we need to switch our plans to creating 4 browsers, two of which fork and feed off one another, and two which represent the cutting-edge versions of those browsers.

>>58784205
Sounds like a plan. How will we distinguish the original two browsers?

File: Logo.jpg (51KB, 775x1075px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 775x1075px

The logo is done

>>58783966
What's wrong, you don't want a built in physics engine?

>>58783981
That hurt to read

>>58784157
crunchyroll

>>58783966
There was a guy who tried, years ago. It was so bad and they patched it so much it became a web server. So Apache was born.

>>58783981
>you will never find this poster and break his arms and legs and smear shit on his face

>>58783966
I'll make the logo

>>58783966
The problem lies in how you define "browser". If Chrome skins are not browsers to you then you'll simply waste time making a worse thing. Otherwise redesigns are perfectly viable and way more convenient as proven by Opera for example.

>>58787738
make a basic frontend for the engine of your choice
bam

>>58783966
/g/ can barely write fizzbuzz. Maybe one post in every 5 fizzbuzz threads would be acceptable is submitted in an assessment for a real coding job.
There's no way in hell this shithole is making a usable, lite browser.

>>58783966
Just contribute to breach.js

>>58783966
Everything /g/ makes is shit.

>>58784391
10/10

File: PicsArt_02-04-03.25.02.jpg (129KB, 973x1025px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 973x1025px

>>58783966
I think we're getting somewhere

>>58784603

How? The browser is slowly but surely becoming an OS/VM of its own.

Deal, or feel.