now that intel failed with ultra low power x86 why can't they license arm
u dum
-posted from 3.5GHz 15w i7
>>58779572
They're also calling their 1.8GHz 5 watt cpus "i7's"
15w im talking smartphone cpus
>>58779585
The line between x86 tablets and ARM smartphones is basically just software support at this point.
>>58779617
yes but why cant make arm chips with they superior finfet
>>58779530
What is xscale
>also: promoting a dangerous competitor
It would be an admission of failure.
ARM is a one way ticket for Microsoft and Apple to cuck you even more
Don't look at the technical potential, look at human nature.
ARM will become popular, and it will be used by tech giants to fuck you in the ass
>>58779701
xscale not the same as competing with qualcomm