>used firefox for over 10 years >always stayed loyal despite

No thank you.
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=168175

W A T E R F O X
A
T
E
R
F
O
X

>>58775564
b-but muh about:config

>>58775564
Chrome shill

Chrome's translation feature is really neat but I like virtually everything else about firefox. No add on can really replicate it well, or at all.

Are there any Chromium forks that:
1) aren't broken to hell?
2) are ungoogled to some extent?

Ungoogled Chromium cannot run translate which is one of the main reasons I would want to use it. Any other good forks you guys are aware of?

>>58775809
translate doesn't even work on Iridium

>>58775564
welcome brother, i switched a while back, have to crank up ff sometimes for testing and every time i do i'm reminded how shit the internet used to be

>>58775564
>doesnt care about its users
>sjw bullshit
What are you talking about

>>58775564

Chrome doesn't have noscript or videodownloadhelper. Chrome is from Google.

>>58776113
They're literally fucking over all addon developers. First they had to rewrite their addons to support electrolysis (e10s) and now next they have to rewrite them AGAIN to support WebExtension, which by the way means some addons won't even function anymore. Many developers will therefore discontinue support for their addon and without addons, Firefox is nothing.

>>58776121
Use uMatrix instead instead and youtube-dl for downloading videos.

My Chromr has been fucking around for a few weeks.
It hangs up randomly for 5-10 seconds at a time for seemingly no reason. Much less without youtube running, which it basically does 24/7, but has never been a problem before. Clearing cache and history didn'y help, neither did reinstalling.

Heeeelp

>>58775614
>Chrome canary has a bug
Nigger what

>>58775809
>>58775889
That's because translating would send your text to Google servers. You can't have it both ways.

>>58775809
check out Nik's Chromium

>>58775564
>>sites literally loading in milliseconds instead of seconds
>>pages rendering faster than my eyes can process

>a browser that preloads links can display pages instantaneously
who da thunk it

>>58775564
>give in to the botnet
Why would you do that?

There are chromium based browsers who have disabled all the Google spy ware.

Use iridium/inox/ungoogled chromium.

>>58776246
>a browser that preloads links can display pages instantaneously
Clearly Firefox can't do that despite having prefetching
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-stop-firefox-making-automatic-connections#w_prefetching

>>58776494
>if any of the websites you are viewing uses the special prefetch-link tag.

>>58776174
Does youtube-dl support downloading from outside youtube and downloading files of any extension you want (such as music, images, swf)

>>58776321
If youre going to bother with the altered chrome browsers then you might as well stay firefox

>>58776617
Firefox is shit though.

The chrome derivatives are literally the best of both worlds.

>>58775660
Any specific reason?

>>58776612
yes, and yes

>>58775564
can't use it because after x amount of open tabs I can't see what the fuck is going on anymore, rendering the browser useless.

Personally, I have no experienced any difference in speed between the two these days on multiple machines but that is just my personal experience. So I have no reason to use it.

>>58775564
>>sites literally loading in milliseconds instead of seconds
cool story googlebro

>>58776246
It's much faster even with prefetching disabled

>>58775564
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QdSLeQ0494

Waterfox is a fucking placebo, all modded Firefox's are.

>>58775564

Still runs lightning fast on my MAC.

Maybe the problem isn't Firefox?

>>58777014
chromebabbi might have a slow pc xd

Did the same for Chromium. When you get down to it, all the useful browsers are privacy nightmares barely manageable with extensions. Might as well go with the least shit one.

>>58776945
Doesn't help Mozilla rolls their own 64-bit now.

File: 1000px-Chromium_11_Logo.svg.png (124KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1000x1000px

Chromium's better

>>58777095
literally botnet

>>58776192
disable h/w acceleration or something, could be a driver

>>58775614

>I'm curious why there is so many comments with "firefox had this implemented many years ago" - do You really thing that this could be motivating? Usual developer looking on such msg would answer "so use firefox or be less offensive".

>Google is company mostly taking profit from advertisement and probably they do not have workaround for adblocker using this technique, so try to understand that it would be unpolitical to add feature without workaround, which could harm revenue and is mostly used in adblockers...

CIA niggers getting sneakier every day

>no Rikaisama on Chrome

Can't make the switch

>>58777283
Cite me a browser which isn't a botnet and still has great security and features.

>>58775564
Try to enable full color correction.

Only FireFox can do that currently.

>>58777438
Firefox

>>58777443
>He thinks Firefox isn't a botnet

I agree OP, but there's one thing that stops me from using chrome/chromium

>white hot flash of light every time you open a new tab
And you can't change the default background color either, it's there forever.

>>58777485
>not using Speed Dial 2 for example

>>58777460
Yes, that's what I think. Please prove me otherwise by showing me the source code responsible for the botnet.

>>58777442
full what?

Yea I don't think I care.

I just can't use chrome knowing I'm sending every single thing I do online to Google. I just can't. I don't even know why, I'm boring as fuck and am into programming, maths and art. Oh wow so interesting woo. Why the fuck would I give a shit, I don't know, but I do.

>>58777496
No, I mean when you follow a link, the page flashes bright white for a milisecond before drawing the elements.
It triggers my epileptic migraines.

>>58777485
https://github.com/jonls/redshift

>>58777501
convert every image and graphic to sRGB based on your OS installed color profile.

Chrome can only do that for images tagged with a color profile.

FireFox has the option to convert everything to sRGB with your monitor profile no matter if it's tagged or not.

This is a big deal of you have a monitor with a profile wider than sRGB.

>>58777543
I've used this, but I have to turn it off all the time because I work with graphics.

>>58777560
Cool.

I got nothing against firefox or chrome (us both), but that seems like a very specialised need.

>>58775564
But what about the RAM usage? It's really uncommon for a simple web browser to use so much RAM.
It's a well known fact that Chrome is actually a secret bitcoin miner.

File: bill2.png (191KB, 372x458px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 372x458px

>>58775614
>muh feature only 56 people have cared about in the last 3 years

>>58777574
Well I have a wide gamut monitor and I can't stand all the colors blown out and too intense.

Trust me, I've wanted to switch away from FireFox for years because of the performance issues; but the color thing has kept me on it.

But with this latest FireFox update, e10s has been turned on; so the performance has been great.

>>58776690
As much as I don't really notice the difference in speed, it's a botnet-free build of Firefox that doesn't include stupid shit like hello, pocket, and maintenance service.

> 1. go fullscreen
> 2. open new tab
> 3. type url of website you want to navigate to
> ?
> 5. profit

That's the main reason firefox is my main driver

>>58775564
I have both, I use both. You're either full of shit or very incompetent.

>>58777601
>so the performance has been great.

I use the dev edition, so have been on e10s for a while, and yeah perfomance wise I have a really hard time seeing the difference between Chrome and Firefox. And that is as someone who has both browsers open 24/7.

>doesn't have Bazzacuda Image Saver
No thanks.

>>58777620
Well since I'm on an AMD FX system, the single-thread design has been killing me until e10s was turned on.

A heavy weight page would slow down the UI and prevent new tabs from opening smoothly - causing a second or two freeze until the heavy weight tab was done processing...

Also when browsing porn forums and opening 10 image tabs at once caused the same thing.

Shit like that causing user experience issues...

>>58776246
ye, cus on forums, we all know chromium pre-loads all the "delete posts" buttons

>>58777500
Hmm, maybe you're right. Outside features which aren't enabled by default, they don't really gather much information on you. Fingerprinting is a problem with pretty much all browsers.

I might go back to Firefox. I miss the better scrolling.

File: background.jpg (350KB, 1653x915px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1653x915px

>>58777485
>can't change the default background color

what?

File: 1484547337302.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

how to get rid of certificate errors on chromium, i can't acces sites like amazon, alibaba etc...

>>58777712

>php
KYS quickly

>>58777712
Dumb chrome nigger, I'm talking about the internal background color that the renderer uses to fill the screen with when a new page is not drawn yet.

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=21798

>>58777750

>significant whitespace
GTFO

>>58777723
Download a good browser.

>>58778706
wut?

>>58775564
>WOAH A COMPLETELY FRESH CHROME INSTALL IS FASTER THAN MY FF INSTALL I USED FOR YEARS

The real torture for the Earth is that the likes of you wasting oxigen.

>>58778728
You will not get any errors if you chose a non-botnet shit-tier browser for NEETs.

File: SkypePhoto_20161224_19_08_09.jpg (206KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 900x1200px

>>58778747
>oxigen

The Bible said the devil was a competent temptress.

File: 1472950231xierdgzraz.png (189KB, 1088x816px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1088x816px

>>58778781
b-b-b-but muh RAM.

>>58778823
Use Palemoon if you care about RAM.

>>58777500
After you show me the source code responsible for the botnet in Chromium

>>58778888
nice quads, checked

>>58776121
Tempermonkey and youtube links script.

>>58775564
Lies and slander.

Is there anyhing similar to open with + mpv for chrome based browsers?

>>58779049
Nope, that's what I miss the most from Firefox
Just using the command line now

>>58779066
that's what I thought thanks anon

>>58777607
>botnet-free build of Firefox that doesn't include stupid shit like hello, pocket, and maintenance service.
Literally all of these things can be easily removed in a few clicks

>>58777438
>Cite me a browser which isn't a botnet and still has great security and features.
here's a good one
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/

File: AAEAAQAAAAAAAAYoAAAAJGRkMTIxZWM1LWY1NjItNGY5OS05MmNkLThmMTYzYzE4MzZjNA[1].png (179KB, 646x223px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 646x223px

>>58778797
Yes?

>>58775564
Please if you post chrome propaganda please tell us your os

When I can rice chrome maybe I'll consider switching over.

The only problem I have with Chrome is that tabs get ridiculously small when you have a lot of them open. Is there any way to fix that?

>>58780262
use vivaldi

>>58775564
>Proxy configuration not distinct from windows/IE configuration
>No distinct from windows/IE certificate stores
>Not as much extensions
I'll stick to firefox thank you

>implying speed is all that matters in a browser
>OP, you are officially a stupid fucking person
>stupid fucking people will be the death of us all

>>58775564
>Having browser preference based upon irrelevant ideological positions that have zero effect on browser development but not caring about whether the browser is a threat to privacy or freedom.
This is /g/

>>58775809
vivaldi

>>58778888
Although you had great quads, this is not an argument.

Chrome is better for video streaming