Browsers

edge on wine

>>58771384
wine???

>>58771376
Netscape

Chromium since though this is a turd, so is fucking everything else.

Let's hope that Open Opera leak gets somewhere, but let's be real, there's a 99% chance it won't.

What do you think of Waterfox?

File: shot.jpg (221KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1920x1080px

>>58771376
Edge :^)

Nightly

File: 2018de0145aafc8e1a0c40c31b37b280.jpg (785KB, 777x1087px) Image search: [Google]

785KB, 777x1087px

>>58771376
Steam browser

>>58771376
Internet Explorer

No, seriously, these threads stink and you are tiresome. Don't you have anything better to do with your life?

Opera 12.16

>>58771400
it allows you to run edge on linux

I'm learning to program in C in order to create my own perfect browser.

luakit

File: 1485585017635.png (353KB, 615x559px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 615x559px

>>58771507
cheeky bastard

I think AirDog or MetalCat

Vivaldi

>>58771376
For the nth time NSA, Firefox is not dead yet.

Fuck chrome and fuck google.

>>58771376
Strip the XUL support from the gecko engine and give it a frontend.

>>58771552
+1

Unfortunately there's no browser out there that can replace Firefox. All alternatives are considerably limited in terms of what their extensions can do, in comparison.

I still use Firefox, and once 57 rolls outs, I'll just keep using 56 or whatever previous version works the best.

Chrome.

Firefox 28

What's wrong with Firefox?

File: icecat.png (177KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 650x650px

>>58771507
Can't you help with a current browser instead?

Either IceCat or dwb if you are into vim key bindings.

>>58771710
>Unfortunately there's no browser out there that can replace Firefox.
IceCat can, and is privacy friendly by default.

>>58771734
memes

>>58771734
This lifeless kid making a daily thread about how there's something wrong with it. Pajeet general?

What's the best browser if security is more important than usability or efficiency?

>>58771734
Nothing, unless you have down syndrome.

>>58771780
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with this guy? He 's been doing this since years.

>>58771747
Is there certainty that IceCat will not drop XUL/XPCOM extensions in the future?

>>58771841
You can be sure they won't n the near future. ANd probably by then many developers will realize they can negotiate with IceCat's devs.

>>58771734
Just some dumb fag.

>>58771376
Chrome :^)

>>58771734
The botnet

:^)

>>58772599
>>58772662
>using the smiley with the karat nose

>>58771747

>IceCat
>AHAHAHAHAAH

IceWeasel already flopped and was deprecated, and now I learn that they rebranded it as IceCat and they're still trying to force it. It was shit.

>>58771376
firefox esr until qutebrowser completely swith to qtwebengine

>>58771450
you mean chrome?

Why shouldn't I be using firefox? What's wrong with it?

File: too easy.png (82KB, 776x252px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 776x252px

>>58773681
it's literally and unironically the browser for cucks

>>58771376

I'm using Waterfox with VivaldiFox and it works well. Cyberfox works just as well.

Vivaldi seems good.

Iridium seems good.

I had too many issues with Pale Moon and Ungoogled-Chromium isn't properly supported.

>>58771376
Firefox

>>58772726

>flopped and was deprecated
no? The original reason for the fork (trademark stuff on the logos/name) was resolved

http://www.pcworld.com/article/3036509/linux/iceweasel-will-be-renamed-firefox-as-relations-between-debian-and-mozilla-thaw.html

>>58772726
>they rebranded it as IceCat
WRONG

ITT NSA.

to shit? It remains the best browser

File: 1459692720331.jpg (26KB, 418x270px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 418x270px

>>58773691
Not even hackers want to touch that steaming pile of shit because it's too easy and not a show of skill.

Embarrassing as hell.

And there are people on here who unironically use that piece of shit???

File: XJVu2c.jpg (536KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 1920x1080px

>>58771376
Fuck off firefox is AMAZING

>>58774197
Even if it is less secure it's still got superior functionality, which is the reason people use it.

>>58771376
I'm kind of looking for an alternative myself, since both Chrome and Firefox pretty much suck.

>>58774231
what functionality? lack of speed is a functionality? you're literally wasting seconds, minutes, hours of your life by using that shit.

>>58774254
>muh speed
Stop with the shitty memes. Oooh Chrome and Firefox both opened the site in under a second but Chrome was slightly faster, the fucking torture Firefox users must endure is simply incomprehensible! Anyway, shit like changing the UI and making it work the way you want.

>>58774281
you've just admitted Chrome/Chromium is faster. why are you wasting your life away?

>>58774291
Why wouldn't I admit it? It'd be a blatant lie to say that Firefox is faster.

>>58774197

because it allows for an easy non-root ad-blocker on mobile

Firefox esr
The real joke here is that while Firefox has gone to shit, it's still better than the competition.

>>58771457
He's being paid to make these threads.

>>58771432
why do you need that now that you have 64-bit firefox?

>>58772726
iceweasel was just firefox with the copyrighted name/logo stripped out for FOSS nerd reasons

>>58771503
Why do you want tot use edge over iron or waterbird, or whatever The maymay browser is these days?
Secondly, isn't there a good chunk of performance loss by running programs in wine?
Thirdly, do you really like shitposting this much?

File: konqueror-4-2-2.png (15KB, 120x120px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 120x120px

Pic related

>>58774298
Whew lad, this is /g/. You're supposed to like <<meme program>> and shout down anyone who doesn't conform to your standards

>>58771384

pics or it didn't happen anon, there's no way that WINE has UWA API.

>>58771376
>Ctrl+F Seamonkey
>0 results
good thing

>>58771734
Google/Microsoft shills

Mozilla has been stumbling in a couple of places, but Firefox has never been better actually

>>58771552
I've tried this before and I find it too slow. It just seems unresponsive for some reason.

>>58774494
>Secondly, isn't there a good chunk of performance loss by running programs in wine?

Wine isn't an emulator or a virtual machine. It's just a windows compatibility API-layer. So as long as the proper API's work/are there, there is obviously not any loss of performance.

The key words here being whether the API is there. Wine is the furthest thing from perfect in this universe.

i use only supreme browser which is google chrome. also have waterfox installed just in case

>>58775622
Why? It's the best browser that still receives updates.

You could just call these "Daily Firefox is Shit Thread" by this point

>>58771376
ungoogled-chromium

but the installation of extensions is a meme, and I can't fucking use Google as my search engine. I can't believe that all browser I try must be shit. I'm going back to Chrome if I can't find anything better.

>>58771376
Opera

>>58776485
>the installation of extensions is a meme
It's just different, and easy as shit. Plus it's not like you install extensions every day, once you have the ones you use, you're set
>I can't fucking use Google as my search engine.
Yes, you can

>>58776856
>It's just different, and easy as shit. Plus it's not like you install extensions every day, once you have the ones you use, you're set
I would like to update my extensions, but that's asking too much.
>Yes, you can
No. I can't. I also tried encrypted.google, but it won't let me use it.

>>58771376
Why is gone ?

File: yes it is ungoogled chromium.jpg (24KB, 573x225px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 573x225px

>>58777050
>No, I can't.
Well, I can.

>never have problems with firefox memory leaking
>during last week ff uses 2/3 of my ram
only me or its global issue?

>>58771376
Firefox.

>>58771376
>too

>>58771376
Now that Firefox has gone to shit I use the only available sensible choice. I use Firefox.


Yes it has gone to shit, yet there is nothing better.

>>58771734
They don't respect the gays

>>58780209
Isn't that a good thing?

File: Untitled.png (5KB, 234x27px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 234x27px

>>58771447
>current state of Edge font rendering

>>58779144
I think the same.
No better alternative

>>58771376
firefox has gone to shit?
haven't all "full-featured" browsers been shit for years?
isn't the real problem behind that is standard web design practices have gone to shit?

i still find firefox the most aesthetically pleasing and capable "full-featured" browser, providing it has classic theme, ad blockers, script blockers, and I restart it every day or two to clear out the ram.

Firefox because /g/ is always wrong.

Ever since upgrading to Firefox 51 my http requests have been failing and/or stalling.
Downgraded to 50, no issues.
Upgraded to 51, issues again.
Thank you Mozilla for spending your money on diversitry instead of testers.

>>58771376
Waterfox

>>58780799
have you tried firefox nightly? it's currently the best one

FF Deweloper Edition. It's one version past Beta.

>>58780811
Have done before, from around version 4 to 30.
I have an actual job now.

Cyberfox is cool for me.

>>58777885
wat

Pale moon.

>>58771376
I really like Firefox/Nightly but some of the tools I use for work don't support it. It's a bummer

File: image.jpg (5KB, 300x57px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 300x57px

LEAVE FIREFLACS ALONE!!!

safari

Chrome.
Chromium is some other cases.

>>58782260
I got that captcha earlier too.

>>58771376
>Now that Firefox has gone too shit, what do you use?
Firefox because there is no better alternative

>>58782525

ree-tard