opinions on readyboost
>>58749313
Yes
>>58749313
Yes
>>58749313
Maybe
>>58749313
Definitely
install gentoooooo
>>58749342
>>58749356
>>58749371
>>58749394
/g/ in 4 posts
>>58749342
>>58749356
>>58749359
>>58749371
>>58749384
>>58749394
trannies arent gay
>>58749313
>be me, poorfag
>have 2gb of ram
>windows uses at least 85% of it at any point
>if i'm not careful and launch many applications the ram will leak into a pagefile
>slow as shit hdd makes helicopter noises when that happens
>mouse starts moving at 5 fps
>"alright let's fix this shit"
>whip out shitty 8gb flash drive
>set it for readyboost
>
>just werks
I don't use it often, but it works if you don't have more than 2gb of ram
>>58749414
readyboost isn't a swap/page file though, it's used as a disk cache.
>>58749313
nesmysl
It's pretty good.
>>58749576
Flash drives, as any solid state storage, are generally faster than hard drives. While using readyboost windows first writes onto the connected flash drive before eventually writing to the hard drive. Because pagefile gets overwritten rapidly, it skips writing it to the hard drive most of the time and that's what causes increased performance when there's little ram installed
>>58749638
>22277000
damn
>>58749638
>22277000
It's been a while...
>I miss moot ;_;
A good idea for vista computers with 1gb ram. totally irreverent today with 4gb+.
>>58749313
Piece of crap and waste of time
>/v/ toddler snake oil
>>58749313
I use it on a laptop with 4GB RAM and a HDD. It works fine, opening a folder with 10000+ files without readyboost is a pita. Using a 16GB SanDisk
>>58751741
ReadyBoost is not to make your gayms go any faster, retard.
>>58749638
who is this tripfag