Is JetBrains good IDEs or is there better free IDEs on the market?

Android Studio is better.

vim

I tried using their early access ide for Go. Not impressed, gonna stick with neovim.

>>58747083
They're laggy as fuck and use like 2 fucking gigs of RAM.

File: 1484997376839.jpg (38KB, 599x449px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 599x449px

>>58747089

>>58747151
Well vim is a text editor not a IDE so your reply is kinda redundant

>>58747151
>faking a GUI with text and ANSI escape codes

>>58747083
webstorm is the only one that is reasonable
resharper is fine too but only because vs is already a perfect ide

>>58747191
vim is an IDE.

>>58747151
Look at him and laugh

>>58747083
I still like eclipse for my Java, Javascript needs.
>inb4 pajeet

>>58747220
Shart in mart

>>58747220
eclipse if fucking horrible, no idea how an oss project got so bloated and slow

>>58747083
>jetbrains
>free
if by free you mean 'activated using a chink license server' then ok.

>>58747281
>atom

>>58747387
well.. c'mon now, it's a web browser, of course it's shit
but 4real tho, atom with java syntax highlight plugin and command line compiling would be more appealing than eclipse

>>58747416
lol, no way
when atom boots up i can go and make me a coffee

>>58747458
What kind of fucking toaster pc do you have?

>>58747083
It's good but it's a matter of opinion.
Just try it out and find out for yourself.

> But I don't want to deal with choice in a free market

Go write C# then you proto-commie.

>>58747508
Just wanted some opinions before trying it, currently using NetBeans and I'm getting tired of it

Visual Studio 2015 for C and C++, Visual Studio Code for LaTeX, Netbeans for everything else.

>>58747083
The professional versions are too bloated with default installed shit you will never need.

>>58747083
>Shitbrains IDE
lol no

File: 1485848824388.png (191KB, 367x321px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 367x321px

I can literally start up the ue4 editor and play an example game faster and with better performance than starting up Intellij.

Embarcadero C++ Builder, kid.

I have used their Java IDE for years and it's been great, I really recommend it over every other Java IDE (real world Java in Vim is just insane).

I tried their C++ IDE though and Vim with a clang-based completion plugin is still superior despite the lack of refactoring tools.

I have heard people say good things about PyCharm, but I haven't used myself

>>58747212
Resharper runs at the speed of smell, and VS 2015 stole most of resharpers useful features and baked them into the IDE

>>58747083
Emacs or Spacemacs, if you need vim keybindings

File: editor-latency-linux-xml.png (9KB, 580x430px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 580x430px

>>58747179
>They're laggy as fuck
Stop lying on the Internet.

>>58747083
Intellij is better the ecliose, netbeans, and android studio. If you are writing java you should be using intellij

vim + tmux

>free
yes
>better than JetBrains
yes

Eclipse seems to work for me. I don't really understand what more I need. Plus there are things like eclim for eclipse

>>58749378
whats the difference between idea and idea zero latency?

>>58750471
Zero Latency is a recently added option
It draws the character immediately and only then does background processing (auto-completion et cetera) in a parallel thread

>>58747083
I use it everyday because I work in Scala. It's nice. Also since java 8 it doesn't lag

>>58747083
Shitty overrated IDE, stay away from it.

>>58747083
I like PyCharm a lot. But I also develop on Mac, so take that for what you will.

For me it's the best IDE's out there.

ni/g//g/a intellij is the bomb. if you're just going to develop web apps, i think atom is the best FOSS

Interned in front-end development for a large software company. Everyone there used WebStorm and vscode.

>>58750671
Nice try, jetbrains.

Meme

>>58749378
Nice, a useful thread in /g/ for once, gonna try this out later. Last time I tried idea was years ago and it was shit.