HDMI cable

File: fgz.jpg (56KB, 498x500px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 498x500px

planning to buy this one:
https://www.amazon.com/Fusion4K-High-Speed-HDMI-cable/dp/B00OC1KD9G/ref=sr_1_11?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1485916320&sr=1-11&keywords=HDMI%2B2.0a%2Bcable&th=1


am I doing it right?

up

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NQ9OQU2/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1485922364&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=4k+hdmi+cable


they cost at max 10 dollars

you shouls only pay that much if your buying it from fucking kmart l

>>58743503
It's trash. Optical will always be faster

HDMI is digital signal

therefore it doesn't matter what cable you use, there is no noise or insulation

dont listen to the fags trying to tell you that $10 cables are just as good
if you really care about video quality youll buy this one OP
https://www.amazon.com/AudioQuest-Diamond-feet-Braided-Cable/dp/B003CT08E4

also, if u truley appreciate the intricacies of hdmi cables, i think u are also going to be interested in this:
http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina31.htm
magic rocks that magically make your audophile setup magically better just by putting them in the room
only $40

Amazon basics like $6.99 for a 6' one. It either works or it doesn't, if it's not working perfectly it will be obvious.

>>58743715
Kill
Your
Self

>>58744659
Well there is definitely noise and insulation. Look at the thickness of a 3' hdmi cable compared to 25'. The point is the the signal is an error corrected digital signal. If the signal isn't perfect the tv won't display anything, or there will be very obvious artifacts. Since a cheap cable will give you the same perfect signal as an expensive one, there's no reason to pay extra.

The manufactures can't sell a cable that won't meet the spec, because they'd all be returned for not working.