Are you exposed ?

>>58727672
>port 7457
panic

File: 1484583645238.jpg (27KB, 463x265px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 463x265px

>>58727749

>>58727780
>it's a router update port that you can't disable
Fuck you ATT

File: chrome_2017-01-30_22-20-18.png (63KB, 1216x692px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1216x692px

TP-Link WR2543ND with OpenWRT 15.05.1 and botnet 2016 standard

>>58727880
welcome to the botnet i guess

>port 5060 is exposed
oh shit

>>58727672
Shows Port 80 and 5001 opened, but I opened them intentionally, so it's fine.

>>58727672
>We found no vulnerabilities
>
>We scanned your public IP address and it looks like your network is not reachable from the internet. This is good news. You should perform this scan again when you add new devices to your network.

>scanning your ports by yourself and then submitting then to botnet
That's a great social engineering idea.

>>58728466
Shodan would have found them anyway so it's atleast better that you're aware of them so you can fix them

Did I just join botnet

>>58727672
Has anyone tried this on a large network like a school?

>>58727672
>No vulnerabilities.

How? I don't know shit about computers.

The only open ports are 22 and 80, which I set up for ssh access to my server, and serving my webpage. I'd be fucked from a ddos, but I don't know why anyone would target me.

>>58728568
Most routers don't have open ports by default.

>>58728570
Just get fail2ban and you'll be fine

>>58728423
>We scanned your public IP address and it looks like your network is not reachable from the internet. This is good news. You should perform this scan again when you add new devices to your network.
>We scanned your network and it looks like your home network is not reachable from the internet.
>We scanned your network
>We found no vulnerabilities

What did they mean by this?

>>58728587
>We found no vulnerabilities
that we would like to share with you. :)

>>58728587
it means they're actively trying to "penetrate" your network by scanning for vulnerabilities. using this website isn't very smart.

File: Shodan.png (50KB, 940x637px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 940x637px

What the fuck?

>>58727672
Fucking kek, "ports 80 and 22 are open"
>marker is less than 8 miles from my house tho
FUCK I'M ON CABLE THIS SHOULDN'T HAPPEN

Why is it warning about 80 and 443? I run a reverse proxy. Just because I'm on a 'home network' I shouldn't host a few sites?

>>58728632
It's targeted at normies

Like, if you KNOW the ports are supposed to be open, it's all well and good

But if it's *information* to you, then it's probably an actual fucking problem that you need to be informed of

Plus, they actually TELL you:
>If you deliberately opened this port to enable specific device functionality, then you’re probably OK.

>>58727672
Oh no guys port 25565 is open!
>This means your network and devices are vulnerable, and can potentially be accessed and controlled by hackers.
>kek

It says port 2222 is open, I have it open inside my LAN but it shouldn't be reacheable outside it. What the fuck?

I tested it on canyouseeme.org and it says it's closed, what sorcery is this?

File: tmp_9013-14845072632561461619413.jpg (74KB, 468x321px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 468x321px

A public Shoah you say?

NoScript blocked it (even after allowing it to execute JavaScript)

Malicious websites will never recover.

I have port 8080 open for qBittorrent. Is that bad?

File: tmp_9013-Screenshot_2017-01-30-22-17-09194183675.png (166KB, 1200x1920px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1200x1920px

>they scanned my network this month
>I have never visited this site before
>port 10001opened

How fucked am I /g/?

>>58728784
that's your torrent client

>>58728798
So they know about my Alexis Texas fetish?

>>58727880
>>58727780
yeah this
that's not "my network" anyway, i guess
that's just a hop with a public ip that lives in my house

File: Screenshot_20170130-183457.png (522KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 1440x2560px

o-oh

>>58728904
Ports aren't your problem
Your browsing habits are

>>58728834
>Alexis Texas
disdain for plebs.jpg

anyway there's a nice way to secure things: disable upnp. Otherwise known as the protocol that allows software on your local network to tell the router to open ports. There's no way to do this securely. Your IoT garbage should still work within your local network.

>tfw home CCTV camera is accessable

A-at least it's password protected

>>58728904
What you get for not browsing with SSL(HTTPS)

>7777
wat do now

>>58728939
>not glorifying the perfect Aryan body of Alexis Texas

Can I do this with the provided modem from my ISP? I guess not :(

File: 1485740408121.jpg (144KB, 700x875px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 700x875px

I don't get it. I use ssh and have several ports open to host videogames and yet it says my network is safe.

What's the catch

>>58730275
Well, are the servers running? Maybe it checks if a port is open and something is listening on it.

>>58731102
Maybe it only checks well known ports?

>>58727999
That really sounds like some online game server port...

Or maybe just the first thing a lazy malware writer thought of. Hard to tell, really.

File: sip.jpg (92KB, 858x893px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 858x893px

>>58727672
eew, sip

> ports 34202 and 34203

the fuck am I supposed to do?

File: Untitled.jpg (91KB, 890x697px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 890x697px

ez

>Your network is reachable through port 6881

I got qbittorrent open

File: 1361279053612.png (93KB, 193x247px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 193x247px

>>58732572

>>58731306
>That really sounds like some online game server port...

Most of these are and are nothing to worry about.

File: ss (2017-01-31 at 05.13.14).png (30KB, 915x419px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 915x419px

B)

File: Screen Shot 2017-01-31 at 11.15.15.png (122KB, 956x1643px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 956x1643px

:O

>>58727672
Passed
>>58733021
Either you've been rekt. Or as stated.

>>58727672
Nice try fbi.

>>58727672
Oh no, it found my webserver.

>>58727880
>>58727780
Just set up a forwarded port on that port to an empty IP address.

>>58728570
Why would you set up ssh on the default port?

>>58728658
you should read their fucking PDF. It's like 20 pages of "the internet of things is new and wonderful and has no downsides and you should embrace it totally" propaganda, followed by a few pages of "lock your phone and don't use default router passwords" as their "solutions" to using inherently insecure devices

Apparently I have port 500 open SOMEWHERE.

There's no forward in either router (two) and my devices are a laptop with linux, an s7 and a raspberry pi

what the fuck

File: Untitled.png (64KB, 1715x489px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1715x489px

>tfw I have a proper firewall.

>>58728550

No vulnerabilities found on the connection here at my state college. They don't block shit here either; you can torrent and do whatever you want (within reason). 75MB/s down and 25MB/s up. Feels good man.

File: vlc.jpg (91KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1024x576px

>>58727672
>Port 7547 is open
This what i get for still using my isp router.
What is even the "better" router brands out there nowadays?

>>58733521
see >>58733106

>tfw in a bus with free wifi
>it's secure

>>58728784
They didn't scan it. Shodan runs zmap on the entire ipv4 address space several times a day. This site just uses Shodan's API.

>>58733780
Not surprising. It probably has no devices that listen on ports, only a router that provides firewalled wifi.

>>58733521
Go to your router's firewall and port forward that bitch to an unused local IP.

>>58733837
0.0.0.0 would be the "correct" IP to forward it to.

>>58733851
It might not accept 0.0.0.0 as it isn't a valid IP address and isn't on the network.

File: noidea.jpg (149KB, 1492x1305px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1492x1305px

>>58727672
doesn't look like it

I guess I shouldnt do a deep scan?

Your network is reachable through ports 25,80,53,443,465 and 993.
Oh no, they missed 587...

Shiet, 11878 and 4585.
What the fuck.

>>58728550
i have, no vulnerabilties

how the fuck do i block the port on my router.
i'm using dd-wrt and i'm using this in my firewall

iptables -I FORWARD -p tcp --dport 4473 -j DROP

>>58727672
UPnP was a mistake.

>>58736363
needs to be input or output, not forward.

>>58736363
Correct rule would be

iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 4473 -j DROP

or

iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 4473 -j DROP

Of course you and substiture the -A with -I and then the rule number so you can put it at the top of the firewall rules.

Remember, firewalls work top down and execute on first matching rule, then terminate.

>>58728570
check out your logs, must be fun to read through when you have 22 open.

File: GOODNEWS.png (47KB, 873x478px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 873x478px

ASUS RT-AC68U Asuswrt-Merlin 380.64_2

Two of my ports are open (one of them 7547, one is one I forwarded for torrent clients)

I literally know nothing about networking, my PC is just hooked into the modem. How do I learn about this shit from zero?

Port 8217 on my provider.

Any tips?

>>58737418
Pluralsight or CBT Nuggets.

$29/Month vs $84/Month

Quantity vs Quality.

Both have great courses, working for the government we have a team contract with CBT nuggets so I get it for free, but prior to this job I used pluralsight.

Pluralsight has something for networking, not just technology.

CBT Nuggets offers high quality courses ranging from Cisco/Juniper networking to VMWare and MCSA courses.

File: 1418161997128.jpg (203KB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 2560x1600px

>tfw cone NAT and dyn IP
Im safe right?

Should I be worried if I use a VPN?

Port 5060 is open, apparently required for VoIP

>>58728550
Tried this on our Trusted network, and surprisingly no vulnerabilities found. All we have on the edge is Checkpoint Firewalls with latest version of Gaia. Amazed . . .

>Your network is reachable through port 443.
>Your network is reachable through port 5269.
Big surprise, I run both a web and an xmpp server.

>>58738457
I seriously hope you have a strong secret or are limiting your SIP somehow.

>>58727672
>your network is reachable through port 443
>your network is reachable through port 9443
This site didn't even find my port 80 and a couple others, what the fug?

>>58727672
DRAGON DILDO