> the current state of Enterprise level software on the Linux

>>58718558
What happens if you want to save another image that is also named "file.png"?

>>58718570

That's a new feature that you can directly copy paste an image into 4chan before posting. I think it might require 4chan X but not sure.

File: 1458790163544.jpg (1MB, 3072x1728px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3072x1728px

Windows is absolutely trash for Enterprise Environments. We made the switch to Oracle Linux this month.

t. Someone who actually has a job.

>>58718604

so you really mean:

>t. pajeet

>>58718604

> t. someone that only runs servers

Let's talk about real software.

>>58718619
Yes real software, not your liberal arts movie maker software.

>>58718633

> He unironically believes most people give a shit about running servers

Nigga, like 99% of the forum here is only about the Desktop anyway.

>>58718619
Do you actually know what an enterprise environment mean? Or are you just spewing shit you don't actually know about.

Judging by your OP, I'm guessing you aren't old enough to know.

>>58718698
I am NOT talking about servers, kid.

>>58718699
I see.

/g/-Technology should really be renamed. It's overrun by millennials today.

>>58718711

shut up pajeet

File: this_triggers_the_freetard.png (11KB, 750x530px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 750x530px

>>58718604
Nice meme.

File: 1482929804163.jpg (2MB, 4201x3001px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4201x3001px

>>58718711
You're right. No one here wants to discuss anything "complex" because they can't understand.

>>58718912
source on pic?

>>58718948

Pirate copy of Photoshop most likely

>>58718912

im curious what is the "other"?

>>58718948
https://community.spiceworks.com/networking/articles/2462-server-virtualization-and-os-trends

>>58718977
osx server most likely

>>58718979

> Fake and gay

File: lalala-cant-hear-you.jpg (14KB, 318x239px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 318x239px

>>58719037
You right now.

>>58718977
Other Linux is almost certainly UBANTO

File: maxresdefault.jpg (59KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1280x720px

>>58718977
Novell Netware

>>58718979
>Fully 87.7% of the physical servers and VMs in the Spiceworks network (which are mostly on-premises) run Microsoft Windows Server
They're just talking about their own servers you moron.

File: 1468455323371.jpg (435KB, 1177x2676px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 1177x2676px

>>58718912
Oh look the shill is back

>>58719161
>>58719177
No, they are talking about their clients' servers, you fucking morons.

>>58719177

You're the only one shilling here, freecuck.

>>58719190
>The company's free proprietary software is written in Ruby on Rails, and runs exclusively on Microsoft Windows.
Hmm, I wonder who those clients might be.

>>58719177

that's some grade "A" damage control there f a m

>>58719202
>I wonder who those clients might be.
They're businesses, corporations, enterprises.

>>58719224
Of course the vast majority of their clients will use fucking Windows on the server when the software they make only works on Windows. Jesus Christ you're retarded.

>>58719244
Or maybe they only make the software for Windows because so few businesses run Linux that it would be a waste of manhours to port it. Not to mention Windows has better APIs for management and monitoring, so it's easier to code for it.

>>58719264
>one third of servers use Linux, slightly more than Windows
>this somehow isn't enough

>>58719300

Source for that claim? It doesn't sound right.

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2467824/windows-pcs/idc--windows-dominates-linux-in-servers--not-just-the-desktop.html

>>58719055
>>58719161
>>58719190

Posting fake and gay stats.

Ms server is used in some places exclusively but in total Linux just dominates enterprise (whatever that means let's say businesses with over 100 employees who use a server for core infrastructure)

No one uses Ms server seriously because it's a huge pain in the ass to manage and very costly.

And cost isn't even the issue, all of the stock market runs on Linux (and in some cases a bsd ) all core internet routers run some form of Linux or bsd.

Ms server is okay if you only have one of them at a small company (doing only Ms dev), it is a total disaster when you have 10 or more.

Even Ms heavy shops I know deploy to Linux.

>>58719318
>in total Linux just dominates enterprise
Care to explain why I have only seen a couple Linux enterprise servers in my entire 20 plus years IT career then?

>>58719177
Winshill BTFO

>>58719318

You're getting it reversed, it's small businesses who use Linux because they can't afford Windows.

Big businesses can't afford the downtime and steep learning curve. Linux's TCO grows exponentially faster than Windows'.

Every big business out there uses Exchange, AD, Sharepoint, etc.

>>58719317
>try to click the source
>page doesn't exist

>>58719327
Possibly because you learned to maintain Windows servers so that's what you workj with.

>>58719338

Nice damage control, but it does. Stay rectally shattered.

>>58719381
Sure does.
Anyway, that article also links to this article, which proves it wrong.
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2467842/weird/linux-is-doing-just-fine-on-servers.html
Next time try reading more than the headline.

>>58719352
It's true that I learned to maintain Windows servers, but I've also worked extensively with Unix and Netware. That doesn't explain it.

>>58719397
That nigga is literally grasping at straws, nobody buys a server bundled with a different operating system than they ultimately wanna use. Reason? Because otherwise they don't get manufacturer support. Stay mad.

Also, you providing that link proves that you were able to open the first article and the link was working. Why did you lie?

>>58719327

You got a ms cert deploma so only daft companies hire you?

>>58719336

They use that for one single deployment all their core business - their bread and butter, what makes the money roll in - relies on Linux.

The joke is even their exchange server is a VM running on Linux.

Majority of VoIP deployments are on Linux platforms (bastardized versions of Linux but Linux none the less)

Hell your desk phone boots Linux.

Just looking at web server stats shows the majority are Linux .

Most windows file sharing I have seen is samba (though that's my experience and probably not the norm)

Government is all Linux for the back end.

>>58719402

I bet you have your ms certs proudly hanging on your wall.

>>58719414
I was talking about the link to the source, which is this
http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?sessionId=&containerId=prUS22224510&sessionId=IL5URBYDC2OK4CQJAFDCFFAKBEAVAIWD
The article is not the source.

>>58719417

>VoIP

wow its fucking nothing kill yourself freetard.

>>58719439
>damage control

>>58719470
Nice buzzwords.

>>58719417
>Majority of VoIP deployments are on Linux platforms
Wew, that explains why it's so easy to hack VoIP systems to spoof caller IDs to do robocalls and shit.

File: DC.jpg (45KB, 200x202px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 200x202px

>>58719499

>buzzwords
>literally have schools for it

these are mutually exclusive

wtf are you talking about op blender runs fine on gnu/linux

>>58719700
But my blender runs NetBSD, anon.

>>58719177

At least check your spelling and grammar before you immortalize your idiocy in a picture.

>>58718558
there is a decent amount of stuff but it's admittedly pretty bleak. we still lack a production-quality video editing suite, for example. you might be surprised if you do a bit of research though.

>>58719327
Working in geek squad isn't a career.

>>58719336
Google mail, 389, Google docs (all which run on Linux)

>>58719760
He's a freetard and GIMP doesn't have a spellchecking feature.

>>58719848
Correction: they run on Google's customized, heavily-modified version of Linux which is not available to the general public.

>>58719865
And that's not Linux? wow

>>58719327
because you exclusively network with MS professionals

competent, ambivalent staff will use whatever is best given the situation and most have little regard for FSF ethics

>>58719910
stop replying to yourself, idiot

>>58719891
That's not the Linux you or anybody else use.

>>58719910
>FSF ethics
>communists talking about ethics
You can't make this shit up!

>>58719928
That's the same kernel and it's linux.

You can stop trying

>>58719928
>Editing the kernel and having custom packages makes it completely different than the distro it is based off of.

>>58719957
It's only based on Linux.

>>58719977
A distro based on linux is not linux

0/10

>>58719926
>>58719946
please do not reply to my posts with dumb shitposts thank you

>>58719988

Yeah and Schindler's List was """"based"""" on true events as well.

>>58719988
>>58719970
It's not just a distro. They heavily modify the kernel itself, you dumbasses.

>>58720013
>>58720006
Every distro modifies kernel you dumb faggot

>>58720027
It's not just a small patch, you fucktard. They implement their own fucking filesystem, for starters. Damn, you're dumb.

>>58719327
because you've only seen a very small percentage of servers in your career

>>58720038
>New file system turns linux into NT
Like your level of damage control is truly amazing

>>58720013
inb4 Amazon Linux is also not Linux.

>>58720038
>they changed 0.5% of thing! it's not thing!
you're a dumb piece of subhuman trash

>>58720050
>strawman
I am the one damage controling?

You're deep in mental gymnastics to rationalize the fact that vanilla open source software does not fulfill the needs of the corporations you pointed out use it in servers (>>58720055 including Amazon).

>>58720069
>0.5%
You have no idea.

>>58720079
Last (you)

>Hurr durr they modified the kernel for a file system it's not Linux anymore :D
Pathetic

File: 1465445417394.jpg (28KB, 380x250px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 380x250px

>tfw aspiring linux admin reading this thread

>>58720090

Please stop, you are just demonstrating how ignorant you are. They didn't make small punctual changes, they performed majour surgery on the fucking kernel.

Stay in denial.

>>58720050

you are one dumb motherfucker. it would be pants-on-head retarded to build google on a heavily-modified custom version of windows. no fucking shit the base is going to be linux.

does that have anything to do with the actual market share argument you freetards have been trying sell this whole thread?

It's a very different beast.

>>58720090
>>58720069
>>58720055
>>58720050
>>58720027
>>58719988
>>58719970
>>58719957
>>58719891
ITT: desperate shills who have no fucking clue about Google or any other fortune 500 tech company's software stack.

Freetards r e k t

>>58720129
only the corporate shills are trying to make an indefensible illogical point

>>58718595
just paste the link on the name box of the image

>>58718604
is it good for desktop

>>58718595
>new feature
>requires 4chan X
How NEW are you?

File: IMG_1484228282335.jpg (43KB, 1276x767px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1276x767px

>>58718912
Wrong

>>58721035

> he takes pride in being on 4chan

>>58718558
need photoshop/any given professional tool? worry not you can use just some bugged piece of shit software instead! LITERALLY no reason to not use linux.

>>58719865
>heavily-modified version

google have been designing their own server hardware for over a decade, you bet your ass they can manage a few low level niceties in linux

>>58719928
>That's not the Linux you or anybody else use.

and windows CE isn't windows you or anybody else use, doesn't mean it's not fucking windows now does it

I'm not seeing the argument here, "google do things on linux not possible on windows! ergo not linux anymore!"

>>58720013
>They heavily modify the kernel itself, you dumbasses.

as do intel, nvidia, amd, cisco, samsung, ibm, oracle, amazon, and they all contribute massively to the kernel, in fact they're some of the biggest non-linux foundation contributors

but waah, not linux anymore guys! damage control!!

>>58720038
>They implement their own fucking filesystem, for starters.

as have every fucking enterprise and their dog, even facebook and intel contribute to the likes of btrfs never mind who contributes and uses ext4, zfs, xfs or the half dozen extremely specialised enterprise filesystems out there

hell, at the same time google were announcing the successor to googlefs (colossus) they also announced the upgrade from ext2 to ext4, maybe they're just a huge fucking enterprise and are using the best technology for the task, whether they have to make it for their mammoth needs or use off the shelf technology like ext4

>>58720079
>vanilla open source

who the fuck do you think develops and contributes to all these open source projects? google is occasionally in the top 10% of company contributions to the linux kernel never mind all the side projects they contribute to, intel is consistently near the top

>[...] does not fulfill the needs of the corporations you pointed out use it in servers

google made go because they were having trouble with c++, guess every other programming language and compiler better pack up their bags because if go is good enough for google we all should be using it goys!

>>58720079
>You have no idea.

what, and you do? hi larry

>>58720107
>Please stop, you are just demonstrating how ignorant you are. They didn't make small punctual changes, they performed majour surgery on the fucking kernel.

and they contribute some what they deem non-proprietary back into the kernel

>majour surgery
what was it one of you shills said earlier? oh yes, I remember
>>58719760
>At least check your spelling and grammar before you immortalize your idiocy in a picture.

>>58720112
>you are one dumb motherfucker. it would be pants-on-head retarded to build google on a heavily-modified custom version of windows. no fucking shit the base is going to be linux.

so, again, what's your fucking argument? they use linux because they have to but it's also not linux because of unspecified (apart from their file system) proprietary changes they make (despite the huge contributions they give back to the kernel) it shouldn't count as linux

the non-sequiturs with you people is unreal

>>58720129
>ITT: desperate shills who have no fucking clue about Google or any other fortune 500 tech company's software stack.

the only arguments anyone is making about google's software stack is you cucks

>b-but they have industry secret proprietary codons! not linux! btfo! damage control!!

>>58721968
Who gives a fuck about Google, nobody uses Gmail or Hangouts to run their business, companies use Exchange and Lync in the real world.