Doesn't get much better than this

>>58708376
>4:3

Anon, you seem to have posted the wrong photo.

> Falling for the "get good hardware for 2X the price" meme

Enjoy your good $400 phone, for the $800 you gave faggot

File: top this shitters.jpg (374KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1500x1000px

>>58708386
After 1:1, 3:2 objectively a very good aspect ratio.

A 1:1/3:2/4:3 display has more screen surface than a 16:9/16:10 display of the same diagonal size.

>>58708439
>$400 phone, for the $800T
The buttblasted faggot from yesterday "apple sux lmao" thread
Lel.

I admire your dedication though. It's like someone actually pays you to do this

>>58708489
>It's like someone actually pays you to do this
LOL THAT WOULD BE HILARIOUS!!! XD

>>58708489

Yes, you would know a lot about paying, wouldn't you?

>>58708469
I wish that flexscan wasn't 1,000 +.

Gaming KEKS will never know understand the power of square monitors.

>>58708489
You don’t see long lines for the latest Lenovo PC or LG Android phone. But take a quick peek on the internet and you’ll find plenty of people lining up to say how much they hate Apple.

>>58708469
how? where?
I want

File: 1482512816440.jpg (191KB, 900x644px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 900x644px

>>58708567
>But take a quick peek on the internet and you’ll find plenty of people lining up to say how much they hate Apple.
Same old story for the last 3 millenias.

File: img_02.jpg (275KB, 700x467px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 700x467px

>>58708589
>I want
Prepare to shell out a metric shitton of cash then.

>>58708648
Always loved the diversity in this pic.

Enjoy sucking off Tim Cook, goy.

>>58708376
>cuck ass shit
also >lacie

>>58708648
Yeah, medical bullshit.

too bad no one else makes consumer 1:1 monitors.

File: 1652-00.jpg (107KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1200x900px

I wouldn't mind one of these as a small auxiliary display. Basically just a iPad retina display in a plastic frame with a display port interface.

>>58708386
it has a 16:10 screen

>>58709221
it's not medical grade?

>>58711297
http://www.ebay.com/itm/181909486149
Already halfway done anon.

>>58709221
Those aren't medical grade. Medical grade are like 7000.

>>58708376
Maybe in 2006

>>58711865
and this is why we cant have cheap healthcare

>>58708376
I really wish someone like BenQ or some other manufacturer would just make a flat-screen, 144hz/1ms response time, 4:3 monitor.

That's all I want. I just want a 4:3 monitor that matches my XL2411Z in performance, that isn't as heavy as shit.

RIP 4:3

RIP 16:10

>>58711982
just get a flat CRT. Mine can do 1080p at 96hz and its an old one from 2000. I just run it at 1600x1200 at 120hz since I can't hit 144hz unless I bring the resolution down bellow 720p. I'm sure some of the mid 2000 CRTs have no problem with that

>>58708469
... and a 21:9 will have exactly as much screen surface as two 5:4 displays. Been there, done that.

>>58708648
that bitch

>>58712914
Close, but no.

>>58713343
>I disagree with your personal experience
mmkay

>>58713352
I'm not disagreeing that it's quite similar to having dual 5:4 monitors, in fact I plan on getting a 21:9 monitor for the same purpose. But to say it's exactly the same is blatantly false. If that were the case the aspect ratio would be 5:2.

>>58708567
This is blatantly false, Lenovo threads are filled with contempt since they ruined the Thinkpad brand and had UEFI-level intrusions, and LG got tons of bad rep on /g/ after the G4 boot loop. You can keep living in this fantasy world where everyone is mean to Apple only, but it's just not true.

>>58708376
>t. mactoddler

>>58712359
I had a nice 19" CRT that could do 1280x1024 but only at 75Hz. And it was like $450 back in 2002

>>58715227
I think the high end trinitrons were like $300 back in 1999 and those were 1440p 75hz. Looks like you got ripped off.

File: 07.jpg (213KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 720x480px

>>58715274
But that's what I had....

File: specc.png (136KB, 1044x663px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1044x663px

>>58715283
I just googled the product code and sure enough they were $275 back then in 1999. I was able to overclock mine to 80hz, but its not really worth it so I stick with 75

>>58714338
Everyone's mean to Apple because they have no reason to be mean to Apple.

See: "Mactoddler"

>>58715305
I honestly dont remember what I paid. Maybe it was only $200.

It was nice, but started to flicker after a few years, and it had issues where it would slowly loose its boarders, or whatever its called, and have the image move slightly.

>>58708469

Remember Chromebook Pixel? Had a nice 3:2 screen. Sounds like the closest 1:1 you can buy these days.
Going pretty cheap. $350 new

File: cbpixel-head-72-960.jpg (90KB, 960x589px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 960x589px

>>58715503

>>58715505
>chromeos
>16gb storage
into the trash

>>58715503
Surfaces also have 3:2 screens

>>58715521
>replace SSD (which is also 64GB iirc)
>install a real OS
Wow, that sure was difficult.

>>58708376
so hyped for upcoming mac mini refresh

>>58715559
maybe it will get compact enough so you can shove it in your anus

>>58715559
>t. mactoddler

File: DSC_0452.jpg (1MB, 4496x3000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4496x3000px

>>58715529
Its soldiered on. :P

>>58715724
So pop in an SD card.

>>58708376
>Mirror display
>Facing window

>>58715559
They'll find a way to ruin it even more than the 2014 model.

File: IMG_20161110_114056724.jpg (131KB, 1090x613px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1090x613px

I'm very sad because mine diead a few weeks ago and im not willing to spend 300 eurinos for a shitty radeon HD6000 Apple Edition™, that was the comfiest pc ever, even more than my x230 with 20 series keyboard. :c

>>58708376
I sure hope you disabled Spotlight and deleted iTunes.

>>58708469
That display made me cream my pants. I'm going on ebay to check prices now.

>>58717774
>disabled Spotlight
But that's the best part about OS X.

Average price for an older iMac?

asking for reasons unknown

>>58717377
>I'm not willing to spend a small amount of money to fix an otherwise functional PC
What the fuck?

>>58717804
It's the worst part. It sends your searches back to daddy Applel. I've enabled root and deleted the entire Spotlight directory. Macs are shitty. I should've bought a Thinkpad.

>>58717923
>It's the worst part
Maybe privacy-wise. I'm talking functionality. If I disabled Spotlight OS X would simply become unusable.

>>58717939
How? You can still search your Mac for files in Finder and you can still search for Applications in Launchpad. I don't see what the big inconvenience is, other an extra click or two.

File: 1485443477404.jpg (38KB, 456x600px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 456x600px

>>58708376
MOL isn't that great of a freight company, anon. More like LOL.

>>58717981
Because I use spotlight for a dictionary, calculator, application launcher, web searches, finding files, etc.

>>58717923

Man is a 2008 version, at this point I save a little and buy a newer one.

>>58718313
A 2600 Pro would only be ~$75, 8800GS (best GPU you can get) would be around $150.

>>58708489
Gtfo shills

that is a pretty nice keyboard, i'll admit.

>>58708376
spends all money on apple products, too poor to buy decent speakers

>>58719850
>speaks in the third person, doesn't greentext
neo/g/

>>58719850
iMacs have quite the system given they're only rocking ~1" speakers. At least speaking from experience with my 2008 iMac. Sure the Apple Pro Speakers I've got lying around would do a better job but I'd need a special adapter, and honestly just don't care enough as the iMac is surprisingly more than sufficient.