10.0.0.1 or 192.168.0.1 ?

>>58706238
>You fags will argue about anything

>>58706238
172.168.1.1

>>58706238
1.3.3.7

10.0.0.0/19
>Use static IPs
>Embed knowledge

>inb4 this isn't hard. It isn't suppose to be

172.16.0.0

or die

>>58706251
No we won't.

10.*.*.* on big networks
192.168.*.* on small (home) networks

>>58706238
this is actually a good question, and it can matter if you're trying to VPN from one network into another.

Personally I like 192.168.1.1/24 for home, as 10.0.0.0/8 is commonly used in big orgs, campuses, etc.

File: superman.jpg (10KB, 261x208px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 261x208px

>>58706238
>using a /8 when a /24 is sufficient
hmmmmmm

>>58706238

who is this semon demon

>>58706277
WILLFAGS BTFO

>>58706238
localhost

>>58706251
10.0.0.*

File: legacy-caution.png (130KB, 498x600px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 498x600px

>2017
>configuring (local) IPs manually

>>58706238
>using IPv4
fe80::/10

>>58706238
10.0.0.1

>>58706238
192.168.1.1 because i know little to nothing about networking. actually i think that's my default gateway.

>>58706238
192.168.178.1

>>58706263
hnnnggg

>>58706238
169.254.*.*

Fuck ipv6. Now I have to get a dedicated firewall for my home network.

File: 1459358889248.jpg (22KB, 317x267px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 317x267px

>192.168.x.x

>>58706587
No you don't. Not anymore than you did IPv4.

Adresses are no longer generated from MAC adresses if that's what you are scared of.

And if you're just running broadband without a NAT anyways, you're a fool.

10.0.0.x/255.255.255.0

>>58706238
192.168.254.254

>>58706238
>not 14.8.8.1

>>58706238
localhost

>>58706623
>ipv6
>NAT

what

>>58706299
bella thorne

1.2.3.4

>>58706623
everyone understands inbound redtrictions. however "open" outbound nat is really bad.
iptables -P OUTPUT DROP is the only sane setting.

>inb4 I like every program on my computer to have unrestricted outbound access.

>>58706640
>fug CIDR

>>58706732
Yes anon, that's a thing.

>>58706238
I'm on 10.69.69.0/24

>>58706263
Not RFC1918 compliant? Kill yourself.

>>58706238
169.254.0.0/16

>>58706840
kys

>>58706471
>192.168.1.1
>192.168.0.1
>10.0.0.1

These are all pretty common default gateways. Most people also use a /24 subnet mask (255.255.255.0). /24 is easier to relay than typing out/saying 255.255.255.0.

Your average person has very little reason to use anything other than the aforementioned.

Where I work we use 10.10.0.0/21, 10.20.0.0/21, 10.30.0.0/21 and 10.40.0.0/21 (we have 4 different subnets that all tunnel into the same fiber network) but it's an enterprise environment so that makes it a little different.

>>58706238
10.10.0.1

>>58706238
::1

>>58706238
She got all ports open this bitch

172.16.32.1

I recommend an oddball assignment from either 192.168.0.0/16 or 172.16.0.0/12, such as 192.168.39.0/24.

This minimizes the chance of a collision should you need to create a tunnel/VPN/etc. to another network.

File: ipclass.png (38KB, 614x780px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 614x780px

>>58707455
Continuing what this guy said because it may not be obvious why it is such

there are 5 ip classes A-E I will only be discussing A-C because thats what we deal with on a regular basis. These are known as private ip addresses and the first octet has a decimal range of 1-254 (Exclude "127", reserved for loopback interface yaddy ya).

>Class A [XL]
RANGE: 1-126
SUBNET: 255.0.0.0
NETWORKS ALLOWED: 126
HOSTS ALLOWED: 16,777,214

>Class B [M-L]
RANGE: 128-191
SUBNET: 255.255.0.0
NETWORKS ALLOWED: 16,382
HOSTS ALLOWED: 65,534

>Class C [S]
RANGE: 192-223
SUBNET: 255.255.255.0
NETWORKS ALLOWED: 2,097,150
HOSTS ALLOWED: 254

How did he get /24 out of 255.255.255.0?
EASY!

192.168.1.0/24 = 192.168.1.0 + 255.255.255.0
255.255.255.0 in binary is
11111111.11111111.11111111.00000000

count the ones.

It is not a "this or that" question OP. We do not live in a world of black and white. You select IP class based on need.

/thread

>>58706277
Yes we will you fucking retard, jump off a cliff.

>>58708028
that shit's been superseded decades ago

>Not using 127.0.0.1

Networking 101.

>>58706238

Never use the first subnet of the private ranges.

>>58707455
>we have 4 different subnets that all tunnel into the same fiber network

Wow, what are you 12?

I use 10.1.1.1

>>58708586
Same here.

File: arpanet.png (17KB, 832x1093px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 832x1093px

>>58708452
>>58708452
Yes i admit i got a little caught up on classes, but it is still knowledge you need in order to understand classfull addressing v classless addressing

term A B C really corresponds with /8 /16 /24. the most popular subnet masks. its clear by your snarky comment you did not grasp my point. this is simply a more technical explanation of

>>58707455

and if you understood IP Classes and subnetting you would know /21 would not be possible without CIDR (Classless Inter-Domain Routing)

>>58707455
>4 subnets
ah how cute, you think you are enterprise

>>58706826
found the specs fag

File: 1427309347176.jpg (32KB, 153x343px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 153x343px

Anyone save OP's pic before some faggot virgin mod removed it?

>>58708900
It was probably OP himself that removed it.
>File: 1.38 MB, 3213x3600, 1484280163151.jpg

>>58708028
It's like I'm in networks class all over again.

>>58708824
That's the one RFC number I have memorized haha.

File: 1485708566122.jpg (1MB, 3213x3600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3213x3600px

>>58706299
>>58706566
>>58707686
>>58708725
>>58708900
>>58708960
I got you. It was in the archive.

Please, don't ban me.

>>58709137
I feel you, I got triggered reading that post.