Waterfox

File: 1477705938057.png (1013KB, 800x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1013KB, 800x1280px

>>58683258
>its great
>opinion piece
Shill

Useless.
Firefox nightly is 64 bit and much faster than waterfox will ever be.
It also has a cooler icon.

>>58683284
[citation needed]

>>58683319
[cure for your down syndrome needed]

Retard.

>>58683339
nice argument, faggot

>>58683258
Why must you fall for this shitty meme?

>>58683258
>Just started using it and it's great.

Every browser is fast and great... until you start to use the serious with addons, history, sync, cache, userscripts etc.

>>58683319
What part of my post needs a citation?
You can obviously see that it is available in 64 bit, and if you don't believe my claims about speed then download both and test them.

>>58683752
>Firefox nightly is 64 bit and much faster than waterfox will ever be.
-you didn't tried waterfox
-i'm too lazy to bechmark both browsers

>security patches way later than firefox

no thanks

File: 1.jpg (28KB, 416x417px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 416x417px

>>58683339
I couldn't think of a worse reply

>>58683871
>I'm too lazy to benchmark both browsers
I have actually benchmarked Firefox developer and waterfox, and found dev to be faster.
Nightly is even faster than dev.

I use lynx. Fuck you cia niggers.

>he's still trying to shill this placebo meme browser

you've been trying this for weeks and it's not going to suddenly start working today. pls stop.

>>58683258
>not using airfox or earthfox

>>58685084
only the cool kids use windfox

>>58683379
lol

>>58685120
When are we getting etherfox or plasmafox?

>>58685393
right before we get Starfox

Why would you use Waterfox now that Firefox have had a stable 64bit build for years?

I've never heard of it, what does it do?

>>58686618
it was originally created to be a 64 bit firefox.
Firefox has been 64 bit for quite some time now though, which makes waterfox irrelevant.
There's literally no reason to use this. It isn't bad, it's just redundant.

>>58686629
No, you moron. Starfox was 64-bit long before that too.

>>58686629


It removes all of the junk that comes pre-packaged with firefox and its written in c++ if that helps anything

>>58686400
Unsigned extensions

>>58687793
Frankly, it doesn't, since its still slower than nightly

>>58683280

God damn, man.... That bosom...

>not using cyberfox

>>58688101
negro of mine

Then how about Cyberfox

Quick, make 200 Waterfox threads over the next week so people think it is popular, then hate it and move on to something more obscure.

>>58685084
2017, year of the Trump
Not using masterful netbending Aviatorfox
Dafuq ?

>>58683871

What is the best way to benchmark browsers?

Asking for a friend

>>58689448
i don't know, i recommend searching browser benchmark until you find a good website
few days ago one of these shill threads had a benchmark image where waterfox was almost two times better on some features, but i don't remember name

t. waterfox user before these shill threads begin

File: 1360503805200.jpg (117KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 300x400px

>>58688220

Source please and thank you

I use it until rikaisama supports e10s.

Hi Alex! Do you still seriously still need to shill your placebo-tier firefork? Just give it up already....

>>58683915
This.
The amount of placebo and disinformation floating around /g/ is astounding. I can't help but feel that tons of people here are better off not listening to any advice from /g/ due to the low average competence here.