Apple: 1 Samsung: 0 Checkmate fandroids.

Not again ffs.

they didn't fly so good

To be fair this is the first iv heard of an iphone exploding but the note 7 was exploding left and right

>>58681083
>the first iv heard of an iphone exploding
https://www.google.com/#q=exploding+iphone&tbm=nws

its because these batteries haven't been pressure tested.

Thats why they always blow up when they are in high altitudes.

>>58681136
>t. AIDF

File: 1482901340178.png (58KB, 630x801px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 630x801px

LMAO
M
A
O

>>58681136
>its because these batteries haven't been pressure tested.
And you know this... how?

>>58681136
>phone literally offers something called "Airplane Mode"
>batteries haven't been tested for airplanes
genuinely electrifies one's pre-frontal cortex

>>58681246
doesnt "Airplane mode" just disable network and such, i mean phones from the early 2000s had it and Apple just doesnt want to remove it from their phones, it doesnt mean that they test every single phone at high altitudes

>>58681291
m8, you're legit brain-dead. In-flight usage is a very common scenario for business travellers, who comprise a very profitable chunk of Apple's customer base.

>>58681039
you mean Apple: 66 Sansung: 0

>>58681310
and still i doubt they test test every single phone at high altitudes

>>58681039
SAMSUNG BTFO

>>58681136
>Thats why they always blow up when they are in high altitudes.

Airplane cabins are pressurized to 8,000 feet. That's not a high altitude. My phone has been to 16000 ft without issue

>>58681136

the pressure change in an airplane is nothing

also phones have barometers in them

>>58681174
>except for the iPhone 7
Literally gimping older phones, lmao.
Enjoy your """hardware support""", iCucks.

File: stock-photo-boy-looking-through-a-magnifying-glass-on-apple-in-his-hand-isolated-on-white-82868902.jpg (32KB, 450x351px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 450x351px

Samsung had the decency to recall the Note 7.
>>58682128
Cabin pressure BTFO!

>>58681136
Because it's air pressure keeping batteries from exploding, right? You are one dumb motherfucker.

There's no way an iPhone, or any phone for that matter, could puncture a hole in a FUCKING AIRPLANE because of the battery exploding.

>>58682407
Maybe ISIS should start buying all those returned Note 7s then.

>>58681174

>Except the iPhone 7

Wow what a coincidence!

File: 1430294842362.jpg (10KB, 413x395px)

10KB, 413x395px

>>58681067

>>58681039
How will samsung top this one?

>>58681039
iTODDLERS BTFO

How will iToddlers ever recover?

File: 1471626080211.jpg (121KB, 462x482px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 462x482px

That's actually really impressive when you think about it. Apple was able to bring down AN ENTIRE FUCKING PLANE with shitty QC on their batteries.

I mean alkaiduh or eye sis have to plan shit out like this for months and work very hard to smuggle bombs they shove up their asses through airport security.

How can samshit even compete lmao

>>58681325
> they test test every single phone at high altitudes

Who would've guessed.

File: Bane_TDKR3.jpg (49KB, 470x706px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 470x706px

Has Loonix or Wangblows ever crashed a plane with no survivors? I doubt it, hotheads.

>>58681083
Apple was gonna sue Samsung because they hold the patent to exploding phones.

>>58687643
>>>/reddit/

File: chartoftheday_2514_iphone_releases_n.jpg (171KB, 960x684px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 960x684px

>>58682276
>>58681174
Been going on since steve blowjobs has been in power.

>>58687158
fucking kek

File: 1475403880789.png (217KB, 798x275px)

217KB, 798x275px

>>58687643
But Applel invented exploding phones.

is this fake news day? an iphone is not powerful enough to blow up an airplane.

this is all fake news. You people are so gullible

>>58688723
>>58688670
>t. iToddler

>>58681039
More like Apple: 66, Samsung: 0