Thread replies: 20
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
OpenBSD 6.0 HTTPD server 2017-01-26 06:07:58 Post No. 58664777
[Report] Image search: [Google]
OpenBSD 6.0 HTTPD server 2017-01-26 06:07:58 Post No. 58664777
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: puffy60.gif (82KB, 599x199px) Image search:
[Google]
82KB, 599x199px
No One can beat the httpd daemon server
Can you do better
http://www.php-benchmark-script.com/--------------------------------------
| PHP BENCHMARK SCRIPT |
--------------------------------------
Start : 2017-01-26 19:03:10
Server : [email protected]
PHP version : 7.0.8
Platform : OpenBSD
--------------------------------------
test_ifelse : 0.145 sec.
test_loops : 0.204 sec.
test_stringmanipulation : 0.269 sec.
test_math : 0.216 sec.
--------------------------------------
Total time: : 0.834 sec.
>>
nice virus
>>
>Click here to run the php-benchmark script.
>doesn't run
>>
>>58664788
of course no
>>58664794
you need to run it on a web server like Apache2 or Nginx or httpd
>>
>>58664794
Welcome to the botnet
>>
File: patchouli_gununu.jpg (123KB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
123KB, 640x480px
>>58664777
>I will never run httpd on my centos server
>>
>>58664842
but it run very on my openBSD server ;)
>>
>talks about web server speed
>posts PHP benchmark
wew
You're literally just comparing PHP execution time, compared to the miniscule time required by either httpd or nginx to pass data from or to php-fpm.
>>
>>58665843
yes sure
But with Apache on Debian , it take more time
>>
Why would I want to have PHP on my web server?
Static site generator mustard race.
>>
>>58666026
TUX is best for static!
>>
>>58666026
yes it's good too !
what are you using for this?
>>
>>58666057
It depends on what kind of website you want to make.
So far I have mostly used Jekyll, Middleman and Hugo.
1/2
>>
>>58666170
Thanks you for this tips, i will try them
Do you think write my own web site is a good idea?
it need many time..
>>
>>58666057
2/2
Short comparison of my personal experience:
Hugo > Jekyll > Middleman
Jekyll
+ Easy to get started on
+ Big community, so many manuals
+ Supports plugins
- Multi language support didn't meet my requirements
Middleman
+ Even more customizable than Jekyll
+ Supports advanced work flows well
- Hard to get started on, not much configured out of the box
- Multi language support didn't meet my requirements
- Outdated manuals
Hugo
+ Easy to get started on
+ Works best out of these three on Windows (I don't use WIndows, but some of my colleagues still do)
+ Great defaults, not much configuration necessary.
- Not as customizable as the others. Might be because I don't know Go, but do know Ruby.
>>58666236
With Jekyll and Hugo you could just get a template and customize it (the way most users use CMSes like WordPress/Joomla).
It doesn't require much knowledge at all.
The reason I like static site generators is because CMSes like WordPress require a lot of maintenance. Since WordPress is widely used lots of security vulnerabilities are found every week.
>>
>>58666285
Wo =)
Thanks you very much for this comparaison
do you think i can install Hugo on my openBSD?
>>
>>58666389
Doesn't look like it's in the ports. Correct me if I'm wrong. You could get Git and Go from the ports and install it from source.
https://gohugo.io/overview/installing/#installing-from-source
Jekyll or Middleman would be easy to install if you already have Ruby.
>gem install jekyll
>>
>>58666466
okey
i will try with the git wiki
Thank you =)
>>
>>58666389
I'm pretty sure you can, because I installed gogs from source, which is in go too
>>
>>58664777
>No one can beat the hyper text transport protocol daemon daemon server
What did he mean by this?
Thread posts: 20
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2