t-this is the version they start debloating, r-right?

>>58636895
>firefox
>2017

lol

>10% market share

LMFAO

>>58636895
Nah. If you're gonna use it use ESR so you only have to fix Mozilla's shit once a year.

>>58636895
Firefox drops ALSA in 52 and hard depends on pulseaudio, it's dead to me now.

>>58636895

It's work just fine you dipshit.

No, the version you're looking for is Waterfox

>But it's just a meme recompile!
No, they actually remove shit like Pocket and the built in DRM

>>58637299
Meme fork

>>58637299

Everyone is shilling Waterfox is it really that good ? or is it shit like ungoogle chromium ?

>>58636895
>black icons in menu & awesome bar
>gray url on hover

Why the fuck are the keep fucking with the UI?

>>58637313
>ungoogled-chromium is shit

Explain this.

>>58637345
Chromium is impossible to ungoogle and it combines patches from multiple sources.

>>58637342
Devs in general do that. They can't comprehend that anyone would want to set things up the way they like it and then leave it that way. Devs love change for change's sake, because new features are fun and maintenance is boring.

FF is far from the only project with this problem.

File: 1441166578005.jpg (96KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 300x400px

>>58637345
anything based on chromium is shit because its always based on some insecure outdated version

>>58637313
some anon few days ago made some benchmarks and waterfox was almost two times better than firefox, it's definitely faster than firefox imo, but some say meme, you decide.
you can try it easily, it uses the same profile with firefox, so all your history, extensions etc. will be there.

File: icecat.png (177KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 650x650px

>>58636895
what do you mean OP
Its already here

Does waterfox support extensions?

Microsoft Edge is fast and lightweight

>>58637271
source?

>>58637718
it supports firefox extensions and when you start it, all extensions installed on your firefox will be on waterfox too
well, i'm not sure about windows but in linux that's how it works
>>58637811
>downloading a media center extension just to open pdf on Windows N
>no webm
>closed source
no thank you

>>58637313
it's firefox, recompiled minus a few things you can disable through about:config, plus a snazzy new logo.

if you want a better placebo, try pcxFirefox instead:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcxfirefox/

>>58637865
>minus a few things you can disable through about:config
Like what?

>>58637811
+10 rupees pajeet

>>58637899
>64bit version (which Firefox is also available as)
>Adobe DRM (just disable the plugin)
>Pocket (Which Mozilla themselves removed)
waterfox is an placebo and offers practically no reason for using it over Firefox, except for: it works on my machine™
>try out the portable and see for yourself

>>58637575
>definitely faster
>imo

>>58638037
how can you add Intel's Math Kernel Library, Streaming SIMD Extensions 3 and Advanced Vector Extension to firefox? :^)

>>58638266
putting stripes on a car won't make it faster :^)

File: 1478815919073.jpg (8KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 236x236px

>>58636895
>another firefox thread
REEEEEEEEEEE

File: 1481793841715.jpg (7KB, 250x228px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x228px

>firefox is up to date

>>58637571
Does the same not go for waterfox?

>>58637650
This

>>58637220
>>58637229
>he doesn't support open source software

C U C K
U
C
K

>>58638266
compile it yourself aka install gentoo

>>58636895

they've been removing bloat for the last two years faggot. pull your head out.