nvidia shills ON SUICIDE WATCH >that 980ti performance WEW E W

>>58634636
Bumping for interest

File: nvm.jpg (23KB, 910x66px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 910x66px

aaaaaaand novideo ruined the party.

>>58634693
>>58634636
Why do nvidiots keep denying planned gimping?

When do we get 1100s?

>>58634636
This is so stupid. So AMD gets better with time or what?

>>58634693
Guru3d are such Nvidia shills. Even when it showed Nvidia losing to AMD they *HAVE* to add an update saying how Nvidia made a better driver and how *HARD* it is to benchmark this game objectively.

>>58634636
My fucking card gets 6 fps.

File: untitled-1(3).png (37KB, 682x909px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 682x909px

GTX 1060 #rekt

File: untitled-2(2).png (37KB, 682x934px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 682x934px

GTX 1060 even more #rekt

>>58635330
>>58634636
Is RX 480 actually better to buy than a 1060 ?

>>58634636
This makes no sense, RE7 demo didn't show this bizzare performance on nvidia GPUs, what the fuck happened?

>>58635360
GTX 1060 ages like milk
RX 480 ages like fine wine

btw btw Halo 2 #rekt the RX 480 but that uses the shitty UE4 engine which a developer admiitted gimps AMD.

>>58634636
So this is a game that scales well with more VRAM? Shit, maybe AMD's Vega with their HBCC might make sense even for consumers.

File: i721ky[1].png (20KB, 639x626px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 639x626px

>>58635379

This game used almost 6gigs of vram.

Its 3.5gate all over again.

>>58635400
>btw btw Halo 2 #rekt the RX 480 but that uses the shitty UE4 engine which a developer admiitted gimps AMD.


I wanted to try and devlop a game on UE4, will I be fucked if I use 480? I don't plan on making a TRIPLE AAA mltimillion dollar production though.

>>58635409
I wouldn't say so by the results, Fury X is above GTX1080 and Fury only has 4gigs.

>>58635098
AMD FineWine

>>58635423

AMD hand tune memory management in their driver for fiji.

>>58635415
The dev said you have to choose your poison. Either optimize UE4 for Nvidia or AMD. It seems it is hard to balance between the two. He also said the UE4 engine is due an update but that is just a rumor.

>>58635414
RX470, 460, Fury all have 4 GB. Can't see why that would be a problem for the 1070.

>>58635415
Use Lumberyard you fuck.

>>58635447

1080p only use 4.2.

File: witcher3j9odb[1].png (37KB, 610x360px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 610x360px

Remember when The Witcher 3 ran better on Nvidia?

>>58634902
This.

>>58635466
There's no 1080 in that list

>>58635330
>>58635355
DELET THIS

>>58634636
>I recently bought 1060 6gb
The buyer's remorse is sinking deep in me.

>>58635491
It's comparing two comparable GPUs doofus. Of course the 1080 will destroy BOTH those GPUs.

>>58635518
ALWAYS BET ON PAJEET BABY

>>58635491

Its there right at the top you idiot.

>>58635519
The guy said remember when amd ran batter, not when 2 comparable gpus ran head to head

If you take it at have value, it'd be false to say amd ran better

bumping for interest

I was actually planning to buy Nitro RX480 8G due to recent discount on newegg, it's literally $200 now. Fucking wew, NVIDIA gimps their cards with drivers again.

>>58635544
Is this bait?

>>58635330
>running the game at 85fps maxed out
>rekt

okay.

>>58635600

No, this is Patrick.

>>58635606

>1060 6GB Nvidia beaten by low end 470 4GB AMD by 30fps.

Sorry It wasn't rekt, it was rape.

File: 1484144519285.png (1MB, 2559x1439px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2559x1439px

>>58635466
it's common knowledge the 480 is on par and sometimes even better than the 1060. the only people still denying it to this day are people who are diehard nvidia fanboys , which is the majority of people who go with nvidia.

File: 1481793865792.jpg (58KB, 570x487px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 570x487px

>>58634636
>390x still more powerful than nvidias current gen

>>58634636
Talk about a shitter optimized gamr

This doesn't make any sense at all, the 980ti and the 1070 are very similar there shouldn't be much difference between them

>>58634636
Not using direct x 12

File: xBgSksM.jpg (18KB, 340x260px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 340x260px

>>58635698

Hawaii is fucking indestructible.

>>58635736

You can't use that as an argument for Nvidia.

>>58635718
That's Nvidia™ game ready™ optimization for you

>>58635518
Nigga we told you.

File: lucky-star-konata-thumbs-up-gif-943346867[1].jpg (158KB, 1108x1154px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1108x1154px

Exactly this same month last year I was asking /g/ about which GPU should I choose between a 8gb 390 or a 4gb 970.
I'm glad you guys give me a nice advice like "you will never go wrong with more Vram"

Best GPU you guys ever recommended to me, just like when you guys told me to get HD4850 years ago.

I love you /g/.

>>58635750
I thought Tahiti was goat, but Hawaii has been amazing for so many years now, still sitting on the midrange and sometimes even on the low high end.

>>58635330

>390 beating/same performance as 980TI


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THIS SHIT IS GOLD.

>>58635355
>>58635330
>>58634636
So this is what a game optimized for amd looks like

very interesting desu

>>58634636
>DX11
What the fuck man, no Vulkan or DX12?

>>58635879

It Vram hungry, the same thing happen with Mirror edge.
AMD Fury got rekt


I hope you are not one of those autistic delusional Nvidiot fanboy.

>>58635447
1070 only has 6GB of usable RAM
I've been saying this since August last year when I bought one but nobody listens

>FineWine™

http://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1653694&page=5&p=19704959#post19704959

>4k
>gimping

This thread, this board and all AMD fans are absolutely tech illiterate.

>>58636234

>470 beat 1060 in 1080p

>All those subhuman Pajeets laughing at weird ass Nvidia performance in those charts
>Obviously remaining silent when a fucking Fury X is behind 470 RX.

Either it's worst optimized game in existence or chart benchmarks are bullshit as always

File: 1480394760605.jpg (51KB, 320x483px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 320x483px

>>58636175
>butthurt european having to resort to years old cards as a defense for getting raped in todays benchmarks
>>58636234
OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN WE NEED TO RETAIN THE STATUS QUO THAT NVIDIA IS DE BEST

>>58636234
>it's amd's fault that nvidia gimps it's own parts

>itt AMD shills post nigger tier charts instead of actually showing gameplay with a framerate in a corner

Really makes me wonder why charts always favor AMD while actual gameplay footage shows drops, terrible min-max differences and overall inferior frame when compared to Nvidia. Fires my neurons senpai

>>58634693
>surprized

>>58636316
>hy charts always favor AMD while actual gameplay footage shows drops, terrible min-max differences and overall inferior frame when compared to Nvidia. Fires my neurons senpai
excuse me?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byldLhkRZ3M

>>58636282

/g/ does genuinely believe this.

File: 1482984588268.jpg (21KB, 458x319px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 458x319px

>ftw own a 390

Nvidia is still better so suck it

>>58636956
yeah man 6 fps is way better than 100 ;^) LE SUCK IT

File: re7_1920.png (121KB, 548x629px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 548x629px

>>58634636
Y'all niggaz postin in a troll thread

Obviously the game is fucked up or the reviewer is.. face it, games require performance and bugfix patches these days.. guru3d already updated their results with new drivers. Nvidia performance still a shit though.

Here's the demo benchmark at gamegpu

>>58635330
>>58635355
>390X absolutely destroys Fury X
What did he mean by this?

Guru3d can't benchmark for shit unsurpisingly

>>58634636
>>58635330
>>58635355
Because the Fury X is better...

>>58634636
Ok, what the fuck is going on? How is Hawaii so up there? Why is a 1070 getting absolutely wrecked? How is the 980Ti getting annihilated?
It's nice and all, but we should wait for drivers.

>>58637198
t.retard

>>58637525

Drivers won't magically increased Fury X VRAM.

>>58635330
RX480 above the 1070.

>???

>>58637639
he's talking abut nvidia, you know i don't really defend the fury because it's a shame it only came with 4gb of vram, but this wont be a problem once vega is out.
the RX Fury will probably have 16gb of HBM2 memory and performance wise sit between the 1080 and titan xp. i don't even care that we had to wait a year for AMDs high end cards
an RX Fury + freesync monitor > 1080 with no gsync monitor.

>>58637198
who's shilling what?
your graph shows the RX480 with less than 50% performance compared to guru3d.

>>58637812
gamegpu are unreliable ruskies and that was a benchmark for the demo, which is still incredibly inaccurate. the fact they use useless CF/SLI profiles when they never work shows how incompetent they are.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Vq6G1e-tZw

a completely new engine runs way better on AMD than on Nvidia.

really makes you think.

>>58637768
>RX Fury will probably have 16gb of HBM2 memory
See, this little bit right here completely invalidated your entire post. I wasn't even including your toddler grammar and the use of whatever the fuck is a Titan XP

File: amdapprovedreviewer.png (783KB, 1083x712px) Image search: [Google]

783KB, 1083x712px

AMD shills are truly desperate if they have to gasp at some bullshit bugged benchmark where 980 Ti drops performance in 4K but runs perfectly fine in 1440/1080p and Fury X is worse than 470 RX. This whole thread is literally one autistic AMD Poojet that is doing damage control shitposting.

>>58637937
Is shitposting genuinely fun for you guys? I tried and it just feels terrible, I don't want to kill this website. Subtle trolling was the best.

>>58637937
How much does nvidia pay you?

>>58637937
AMD fanboy here, i'm shitposting ITT because I know that there's something wrong with the benchmarks or most likely nvidia drivers incompatibility with this new engine.

and, by the way
>implying you nvidiots wouldn't be spamming at least 5 threads/minute if the situation was reversed.

>>58637936
most rumors have it sitting at 16gb of hbm2 memory. i know you're nvidia dick rider but don't kill yourself when it gets announced.
>titan x(p)ascal is too complicated for my drone brain waa

>>58637987
>subtle trolling

i've been here since 1916 and I can guarantee that there wasn't a single subtle post here, ever.

I've no idea from where you came from, but you should rush back there before you're new shows.

>>58637937
>literally DELET IT, the post

>>58638045
>i know you're nvidia dick rider
Nah, I hate nvidia and their retarded sheep.

We already saw the die with only two stacks of HBM2 meaning it will probably have 8GB since single 8GB stacks are not ready.

>>58637937
Is this Aussie also a Pajeet?

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiYQqNiqQKU&t=945s

Well they both play cricket I guess.

>>58638071
Thanks, anon. I at least got a chuckle from that.

No youtubers picked up on this yet.

reaaaaaally makes you think.

For context they all had powergate RX480 ready to publish at the exact minute from the NDA lift.

JayZ is probably in a fetal position crying under the shower right now.

>tfw i have Hawaii going on 3 years

>>58636370
Nvidiot BTFO

>>58634902
Because i have never seen any significant evidence nvidia intentionally degraded the performance of their older products.

>>58635360
yes

I have a 980Ti

someone explain the pic in OP. wtf is shit?

>>58638535
Nah they just didn't update fix their drivers for older GPUs to work with newer games so it looks like they gimped them. Lazy devs.

>>58634693
>nvidia shits up
>bash AMD just in case
kek the damage control is hilarious

>>58638252
Maybe because only a retard would fall for this?
at 1440p the 470 is faster than the 1070 IN this game.

>Radeon ReLive
they gunna make nvidiots relive 3.5gb all over again.

lol you Nvidiots thought you were so smart.

470 4Gb BTFO 1060 3GB

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ay_NWfaRiPc

>>58638644
>implying youtube shills are anything else than retards for hire.

>>58638666
Satans trips confirm. Nvidiots on high damage control.

this game looks bad, uncanny valley maxed out on captured videos.

File: 1482350692105.jpg (98KB, 750x1015px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 750x1015px

>>58638666
>>58638699

>tfw Vega will run this game at 144fps+ at hdr 4k maxed out.
>tfw it still wonn't 60+ on Metro Last Light.

Ya'll niggers were going on about how Halo 2 with it's old and busted UE4 engine was better on Nvidia. Payback's a bitch.

Even on high end cards the minimum frame rates are fucking awful and seemingly random. The game is just broken, wait for updates.

hardOCP didn't even have the face to post a comprehensise IQ/gpu perf review like they do with every single AAA game.

Kyle is probably holding JayZ under the same shower crying themselves to sleep. >>58638252

>buying a 3gb card in 2017
My friends who bought the 1060 are pissed

>>58634693
>surprized

>>58636381
And /g/ is completely correct too

>>58635518
Fine Wine baby

>>58635664
>there are people who pay $500 for 10fps

>>58634636
>390x above fury x
>both above 1080
>rx 480 above fury non-x
>rx 470 above 1070

This doesn't make any fucking sense. Especially the 28% difference between the fury x and fury. You can't explain that away with vram, especially when they are rarely more than 10% away from eachother.

Is this game in alpha or something?

>>58639070
>. You can't explain that away with vram

People said the same thing about 970 but Nvidiot refused to believed it.

>>58639070
game developed first and foremost with console in mind.
This is sweet revenge against GimpWorks.

AdoredTV was right, even for dx11.

>fury x beating the 1070 and 1080

In what universe?

>>58639190
the one run by Umbrella Corp?

>>58639249

Made me chuckle anon.

But it's pretty clear drivers are not ready or the game is just broken. Just look what this anon >>58639070 pointed out.

>>58639131
The fury and fury x have the same ram. The only difference is 1050mhz vs 1000mhz core clock and sharder count. And generally sqeezing 1100mhz out of a fury will put it within 1-2% of a fury x.

Im not saying vram capacity is not holding them back at all, but it doesn't account for the massive difference.

I own a 1060 and it's pretty disappointing because I didn't buy the absolute cheapest model. Pascal doesn't actually OC, they're just clocked 10% lower than their voltage can handle, and you are not allowed to change the voltage at all. It's stuck at 1.093. The only way to is through hard modding, which will ruin my resale value. It's so decieving that they advertise all these extra power phases and shit and it doesn't matter if you buy a $900 hybrid super duper 1080 or a $560 blower.

>>58639308

390 and 390x got higher Vram
4xx series got newer architecture that proved run better on DirectX11 tittles.
Fury series got limited Vram and old architecture.

Worse could happen is they forced capcom to reduce the Vram usage so it won't embarrassed nvidia like what they did to Assassins Creed 1.

Just look what happen to MadMax And mirror Edge when Nvidiafan complain if Hyper Mode is enabled and used more than 4Gb of Vram.

File: 762628-jean_cries.png (1MB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x900px

>be AMD fanboy.
>this is the best day since the Atlhon64 launch.

The smart buyer buys AMD. The impulse nigga buys Novidya.

>>58639397
The 400 series cards are hardly different from their predecessors from an architecture standpoint, especially the fiji and tonga chips which both use GCN 1.2 vs the rx 400 card's GCN 1.3.

The rx 480 is practically a die shrink.

>>58639572
>The 400 series cards are hardly different from their predecessors from an architecture standpoint
Except that's wrong given how Polaris does have an IPC increase compared to Tahiti and Hawaii whereas Pascal has practically none.

>Nvidia improves ‘Resident Evil 7,’ more with latest GeForce drivers
>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/nvidia-releases-geforce-graphics-drivers-37849-whql/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Vq6G1e-tZw

Wait for driver they said
It will be fixed they said.


Meanwhile AMD owner still playing this game using driver from 8 days ago.

File: tmp_7350-1484795425093-385099477.jpg (140KB, 521x480px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 521x480px

>>58636638
390 shitting on kids

File: 728e6165bb3f8d004b0d3196a603c897.jpg (124KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 600x600px

I listened to Jayz back on his 390 vs 970 video, no regrets at all despite being a filthy ignorant consumer. I'm probably upgrading to Vega if they can somehow price it well despite it being a huge die with expensive HBM2. Nvidia are pricing the 1070 and 1080 however the fuck they want, but I doubt Vega will be that much cheaper.

File: amdpolaris-540x334.png (104KB, 540x334px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 540x334px

>>58639572
Wow, all those old parts, sure looks like just a die shrink!

>>58639730
Polaris has something like a 10% IPC bump and slightly better bandwidth utilization thanks to DCC. Even if Pascal was a virtual non-change, Polaris's improvements weren't enough to catching up, and AMD needed a 15% bigger chip with 33% more bandwidth and 25% more power draw to go against the GTX 1060.

FineWine(tm) driver support from long-lived architectures is great and all, but Vega should've come a year or two earlier, even if it was stuck on GDDR5(X).

>>58640105
All of these fancy words, and the 480 is still on par with the 1060

>>58640116
I actually upgraded from a 670 to a 480 out of spite from what happened to me after Maxwell's launch, but I can't pretend that Polaris is a better architecture than Pascal.

I'd say the 480 is still a marginally better card than the 1060 since I'm not an overclocker, but it should have been solidly ahead rather than just trading blows given the raw specs.

>>58640210
Again, all these fancy words, and its still a preddy gud card.

>>58635098
Kind of. AMD's release drivers are always awful. Their 480 now tops the 1060 in almost everything, but at release the 1060 averaged around 20% lead in fps.

>>58635360
Definitely worth it

>>58640116
>>58640266
The problem is that prices are limited by what the least competitive party is able to sell parts for.

If Polaris were able to perform as well as it does currently with a 192b/6GB/200mm^2 setup like the GP106, both it and the 1060 would be selling for $30-$50 cheaper than they are currently.

It's nice that AMD is selling some parts to the mainstream segment, but it would be better if they weren't just giving Nvidia breathing room to gouge customers.

What engine is RE7 based on?

Will it be used even more in future games?

File: lURh254.jpg (90KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 633x758px

>>58636638
>tfw own a 980ti

Vegaaaaaaa wheennnnnnnnnnn

>>58639017
Only people with too much money for their own good. 1080 should be hobbyist's limit, as only companies like pixar will make use of that extra $500.

File: undyne smug.png (215KB, 500x466px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 500x466px

>>58634636
so this is the thread where jewvidiots engange into damage control?

how cute

>>58639730
I'm not even talking about nvidia's cards right now. I could give a fuck less about them. Polaris is largely the same architecture as tonga and fiji, and the changes made between the two are mostly made in the name of efficiency.

Ignoring the shrink to a smaller node, it's probably a less dramatic change in architecture than GCN 1.1 (hawaii) -> GCN 1.2 (tonga and fiji), which itself really wasn't that big a change.

GCN has kept much the same inderlying CU design and overall principles since its introduction. The first time we'll actually see it reworked in a big way will be with GCN 2.0 aka vega.

I'm about to buy a 1060
Should I go for the 480?

>>58640395
It's always these ancillary details that drive me crazy. I really don't care so much that the perf:watt is not as good as the competition, or the die size doesn't maximize profits as much.
People always mention these details as if they take away or negate the whole design somehow.

Its on par with a 1060
>But muh perf:watt
>But muh die size
>But muh asynchronous compute
Give it a rest

It's simply impossible for some people to pay a complement without some type of disclaimer.
I do however, like the technical side of things that explain the memes.

>>58635330
>>58635355

OY VEY YOU STUPID GOY DELET THIS

DELET THIS!

>>58640518
Really ironic seeing as Nvidia's offerings were closer to a die shrink than their competitors

>>58640536
jus go with the 480 8g

File: images.png (12KB, 245x205px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 245x205px

>>58635518
>>58635537
>>58635810
>>58639010
>>58636638
>>58640435
>>58638957
>>58639511
>>58640569
>tfw copped 480 8gb when everyone was shilling 1060

>>58640438
>Vegaaaaaaa wheenn

not fucking soon enough.
GCN is creaking with old age, and Pascal is 200% hebrew priced thanks to weak competition.

>>58640536
Are you retarded? The obvious choice is the 480

>>58640622
But what about other games?
I couldn't give 2 shits about RE.

File: 1465730801681.gif (868KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

868KB, 500x500px

>>58636638

>>58640621
I want to upgrade my 290x NOWWWWW

REEEEEEEEEEE

HURRY UP AMD

>>58640659
480 is still the better buy

>>58640693
Is the overheating memes true tho?

File: GTX-1060-UPDATE-100.jpg (66KB, 649x221px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 649x221px

>>58640659
They retested the cards with updated drivers from release and team red comes out ahead.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/73945-gtx-1060-vs-rx-480-updated-review-23.html

>>58640733
Fuck no. Haven't gone over 75 with like 50% fan with my xfx

>>58640733
I have a red devil and I can keep it under 70C with 20% fan.

File: 1234123.jpg (105KB, 796x805px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 796x805px

>>58636370

DELET

File: Capture34.png (268KB, 1383x643px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1383x643px

>>58640795
Running some trips

>>58638573
guru3d is real, but nvidia released a patch that improved performance, but 980ti and 1060 gets still btfo

>>58638573
>>58640906
but it's a nice look into the future when nvidia shit's on the 10XX's support and tha r9 390 will deliver a better performance than the 1070

>>58637029
>Why would you need more than 6 fps goyim, 3 fps is surely enough, 100 fps is just a amd meme

>>58638104
>8gb isn't ready
Nor is Vega, it might be possible if it's still quite a way off

>>58638369
>Tfw Hawaii is almost 4 years old

>>58640963
>MrHands.mp4

>>58638573
Its you getting cucked

>>58639070
Its a VRAM problem

File: 1483559326551.png (66KB, 947x839px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 947x839px

>>58640869
I loaded it up for my GTX680 for giggles to see how it held up
Averaged about 75M/s but only used between 25-60% of my GPU
Fucking CUDA

>>58640536
Based on everything in this thread, go for the 480

File: gasai_yuno__gintama_s_troll_face__by_lordkiko-d6d9dux.png (66KB, 540x320px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 540x320px

>>58634636
lmfao, what in ever living fuck is going on here?

Is novidya gimping all their shit again?

>>58641071
Yeah, you actually have to set up the CUDA part manually somehow for it to do much. Didn't pay attention, don't know how. I don't think the program was designed to use CUDA first and foremost tho.

>>58634636
Is anybody surprised about this? really?

Nvidia had done this shit for years, the butcher their own cards with newer drivers.

Nvidia never ever EVER fucking again..FUCKK

>>58641119
yeah have to specify blocks.
Get about 100M/s setting it below 64/cell though
Supposedly found one real fast though

>>58641275
I knew that card could do 100+
480 has settled down to 318-320m/s

>>58636316
RED ALERT RED ALERT

FUCKING YOUTUBE BENCHMARK FPS COUNTER POSTER TO JEN HSUN HUANG'S RESCUE

EVERY. GOD. DAMN. TIME.

>>58641275
What is the purpose of doing that? What is it doing? I'm talking about the entire program.

File: 1451719593836.png (217KB, 447x547px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 447x547px

>MFW bought 390x
I'm ready for more suprises

File: 1484158721192.png (265KB, 501x382px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 501x382px

>>58634636
>tfw r9 290

>>58634636
>rx480 faster than a fury
THE GIMPING IS REAL!
AYYMD FAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>58641512
Calculating hashes. Just a benchmark of sorts.

>>58634693
>aaaaaaand novideo ruined the party.
Not really because they updated it and Nvidia is still losing you retarded fuck

>>58637268
>>58637427
no drivers yet
>>58635879
It has nvidia gimpworks though

>>58637268
Well that's obviously to do with a VRAM limitation. The real question is what in the fuck is happening with the 470 outpacing the Fury line.

I literally would never expect AMD could win the driver game. Kek, they fucked nvidia's shit up with a single driver release. Mean while nvidia toddlers are still dealing with their goyworks, goyim experience updates.

Anyone know exactly what AMD cards got drivers? The change log just says "support for resident evil 7."

>>58637886
>the fact they use useless CF/SLI profiles when they never work shows how incompetent they are
Not at all, moron. It shows that they go through the effort to prove that most of the time mGPU profiles are not implemented and record the scaling when they are.

>>58635698
Fucking This so hard my nigga salmon

I'm not a gamer babby.

Which GPUs have the best proprietary drivers?

>>58639017

It's a pretty big jump at 4K over the 1080, especially if you want 60 FPS.

>>58635920
>4gb 470 beating 6gb 1060

>>58644341

>6gb
>it actually 3.5gb+(1/2)2.5gb

>>58635360
yes I Own the 480 and tested a friends 1060. The 480 is significantly stronger Especially if you got locky with silicon and have a 1400-10450 mhz OC capable one.

The 480 is so strong that it can get 55-60fps on witcher3 at 1080p with hairworks on. You have to tweak the quality and AA a bit and limit tesselation to x16 or x32 but you can get it running smooth.

1060 only does 60fps lock on ultra settings with Hairworks completely off even hairworks on low settings causes it to shit the bed and overclock doesnt help much.

There are few games where the 1060 does better like ARK: Survival evolved but thats do to shitty developers and the performance is not significantly better unless you are pushing a hard 2000mhz overclock constantly.

Pascal only wins because AMD didnt put out anything stronger than a 480 to compete with the 1070/1080. If your looking for a high end GPU in Mark/April then buy vega because if polaris is this good against the 1060 then Vega is going to fucking stomp the 1080/1080ti

>>58635859
AMD had massive limitations in software and drivers because their architecture is Professional side optimized and re-purposed for variable workloads in gaming. So in order to compete they had to over engineer their cards often making them 50% more powerful that the nvidia counterpart only to have them run 90% as fast.

Now with API's and better drivers for DX11 you are seeing that extra power latent in the cards being tapped.

AMd cards have always been compute heavy monsters and now that modern games need more computing to handle all their graphics and effects AMD is curb stomping the Nvidia cards with weaker compute throughput

>>58634636
>390x beating furyx
amd fags on suicide watch
seriously tho obviously somting is fucked in that game
>>58634902
>muh gimping
it's called having good drivers right away, vs amd who has to rely on much bigger chips to get good performance right away.

File: 1479430772794.jpg (77KB, 959x721px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 959x721px

>>58646615
>a better chip to achieve good performance
>means you get prolonged performance
How is that a bad thing?

>>58646677
power consumption (for you)
harder to bin (for amd)

>>58645168
>Vega is going to fucking stomp the 1080/1080ti
It already can't beat the 1080 in Doom on Vulkan, which is like designed for and by amd or something lol

File: 1483501499784.jpg (89KB, 1127x685px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1127x685px

>>58635355

>>58635698
Im so happy I got a 390x. Its the king of medium budget cards and constantly embarassing cards way more expensive than it.

>>58646732

Hawaii exists solely to fuck up Nvidia fanboys.

>"there is no way the original gangster titan can be matched by AMD, its simply impossible!"
>290x beats it for half the cost

>>58646732
Nothing is more embarrassing than a 390x in real world applications though.

>more heat than my nans oven
>more noise than a Boeing 747
>more cost than a gtx 980
>less performance than the 980

File: 1446667091224.png (8KB, 196x171px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 196x171px

>>58646757

>>58646757
bought one for $165 last month. no ragrets

>>58634636
Stop cherry picking your retarded benchmarks and get some REAL benchmark, not sponsored games.

http://blenchmark.com/gpu-benchmarks

Link related, almost no AMD cards, none of them are relevant.

File: 1474088525338.gif (953KB, 310x233px) Image search: [Google]

953KB, 310x233px

>>58646683
What third-world shithole do you live in where the difference in electricity consumption actually makes a large difference?

File: 1477504636442.jpg (149KB, 1014x676px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1014x676px

>>58646782
>sponsored game
>Nvidia gimpworks
What did he mean by this?

>>58635330
>>58634636
>>58635355
Fuck You fuck you fuck you all.

Remember /g/'s eternal motto "If Nvidia doesn't win it doesn't count!".

>>58634636
>No R9 290X
Does it have comparable performance to the 390X or 390?

>>58634636
>nvidia on top
>suicide watch

ok

>>58647046

Outside of vram differences the 290x usually sits where the 390 does.

>>58647136
What about my old and cheap 290 <-unauspicious lack of X?

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/resident_evil_7_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,6.html

>** Update #2: after lots of weird results with graphics card that have less then 4 GB of VRAM we found out that the problematic settings is Shadow cache. If you have an up-to 4 GB graphics card, please turn it off and you'll be playing properly. The charts are now updated to reflect that.

NVIDIA WON

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH

POO(R) VOLTA

kek

Nvidia fastest in RE7

AYYMD POO IN THE LOO

>>58647190
You can overclock it or just use it.

>>58647206
> RX 480 is faster than GTX 980
> NVIDIA WON
OK.

File: 1483075438251.gif (443KB, 400x296px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 400x296px

>>58647206
>fixed the apparent "issue"
>Nvidia cards still getting royally buttfucked by AMD anyways

File: 290x stress test.png (481KB, 1811x965px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1811x965px

>>58647190

Below the 390 as the 290 is the same chip as the 390 running 50mhz slower and with 4gb less vram (there were 8gb 290x models, not sure about 290).

As long as you can cool it, clock it is the motto for hawaii based cards.

>>58646838
This. At the absolute worst. You're talking 15/year

>>58647190
390 and 390x are 290 and 290x cards with higher stock clocks and 2x ram that is a little faster. Clocking a 290x to the same speed as a 390x delivers the same performance assuming the 4gb is not a limitation.

So if you're able to get a little overclock out of your 290 it will perform the same as a 390 more or less. Since GCN first appeared the cut versions of cards have generally been able to match the performance of their fully enabled brothers provided they can maintain a decent, stable overclock.

So far, anyway. Theoretically the reduction in compute performance from lacking raw hardware could play a bigger role in low-level api games but we've yet to see many examples.

>>58646838
What igloo do you live in where adding a 300w space heater to your room sounds appealing?

>>58647360

As baby hawaii is only lacking in shader units the difference is tiny as it keeps all the ROPS, cache etc etc.

File: 1484025893602.jpg (16KB, 305x374px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 305x374px

>mfw gtx 1080
oh no now i see where i fucked up
no regrets tho
n-not yet

>>58647390

I don't think you understand how little 300w is. Space heaters, kettles and other such devices are rated into the kilowatt range.

>>58647274
> 480: 91fps
> 980: 91fps
wew lad

>>58647206
The fact that the 1060 lost to the 470 means AMD won.
$250 card < $180 card

>>58647455
But friendo, the 980 is priced between £400 and £700

File: 1484341269182.png (21KB, 194x245px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 194x245px

>he paid the gimp vidia tax
>he paid the gimp sync tax
>he had to login to facebook to update his drivers
>he had to login to facebook to record gameplay

WEW
E
W

Nvidiots are being memed by "social media" alphabet agencies real hard.

>>58647396
The reduction in stream processors stems from 4 disabled compute units. It's essentially a 10% reduction in hardware and a 5% reduction in core clockspeed.

So far getting a 290 to 1100mhz is usually enough to match a stock 1000mhz 290x, but the reduction in compute potential could play a bigger role where it becomes better utilized.

>Let's turn off a feature that speeds up GPUs just so Nvidia can look better.
>AMD still beats Novidya by a large percentage in the midrange

>>58648303

>>Let's turn off a feature that speeds up GPUs just so Nvidia can look better.

I see Guru3d subscribes to the Futuremark philosophy of benchmarking.

>>58634636
The gimp is real

>4k
>not 1080p
WEW
E
W

>>58647390
The type of igloo that has central air. What kind of 3rd world shithole do you live in that doesn't have central air?

>>58648448

Some people are sensible enough to not live in places where it gets so hot you can fry an egg on your car.

>>58648482
>He lets mother nature cuck him instead of using technology to determine for himself where he lives
Wew lad.

>>58648303
Not even just in the midrange. There's a Fury beating a 980Ti and the Fury X beating the 1070.

>>58648443
Why would 1080p be relevant for a high-end graphics card comparison?

>>58648532

Its the only way Nvidia has an advantage and thus is suddenly the most important thing ever.

>>58648532
The average consumer still games at 1080p

File: Clipboard-1.jpg (168KB, 1081x1391px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1081x1391px

I'm throwing a bone for the Novidya crowd

>one game
I really don't understand any of the posts in this thread
it's one buggy game

one

>>58648628

>that 780 performance

Slower than a goddamn 7970 these days.

>>58647206
>Games that have less than 4GB of VRAM have a problem with Shadow Cache
>470 (4GB) has no problem with it
>1060 (6GB) has a problem with it

Topkek, these fucking shills.

File: vulkan 960 vs 780ti.jpg (120KB, 548x629px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 548x629px

>>58634636
>kepler gets gimped
>nvidiots still buying nvidia
>now maxwell gets gimped

FUCKEN LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE THIS COMING? TRUE NVIDIOTS

File: Doom_01.png (71KB, 1304x1616px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1304x1616px

>>58649161

Fun fact: async compute isn't enabled in gamegpu's benching because they didn't use TSSAA (or no AA) - the only two settings that enable async compute in doom.

When you do enable it pic related happens (is using TSSAA).

>>58647206

>Turn off some feature to favor Nvidia
>1050ti still beaten by 460
>1060 still beaten by 470

And this is fair, how?

>>58649161
Does nvidia gimp or does amd just work on improving old card performance more?

>>58649161

I loved how GTX Titan doesnt exist in most benchmarks just to help their owner from possibility of buyers remorse.

>>58649380
a bit of both i'd say

>>58649380
just the latter, the gimping hing is a meme

>>58649489
No it isn't.
http://techreport.com/review/21404/crysis-2-tessellation-too-much-of-a-good-thing

File: 1485190475313-pol.gif (33KB, 340x300px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 340x300px

>>58635360
No, but it ages better. The 1060 can easily oc past 2ghz and memory can go much further. I use my 1060 on older dx11 games.

I can't wait till vega launch.

>>58649551
this is a completely different thing and I agree that it is real

fucking over amd cards is NOT the same as gimping their own older cards, which is the thing >>58649380 was asking about and there is zero evidence for

>>58649380
amds raw compute power is often higher than the rival nvidia card. but nvdia engineers for the now and optimizes their computing power and are actively pushing the software they needto make their hardware shine, while amd has unused features/computing power that might be relevant in years.
and giving a shit on their old cards makes the rest

>>58649380
Both

>>58649651
The tessellation is a perfect example, actually. Nvidia's previous gen cards couldn't do it as well as their next gen cards. AMD also couldn't do it as efficiently either. So the tessellation gimped both the older nvidia hardware AND the AMD hardware. If Nvidia can fuck over their own customers to fuck over AMD customers, they can, will, and already have.

Let's not forget 3.5GB either.

>>58634636
Good thing I have the New Titan X

>>58648628
What's the source of this benchmark?

>>58649797
yes I know about that and it's a shitty thing to do

but this is not the same as gimping their older cards

we're talking about a driver issue here, not specific games
>3.5gb
hardware problem
does not get worse with time
etc

>>58649829
>having developers use too much tessellation in their games because it gimps your old hardware and your competitors hardware
>isn't the same thing as gimping your older cards

you're on a whole nother level of delusion there buddy

>>58640518
>The first time we'll actually see it reworked in a big way will be with GCN 2.0 aka vega.

That's what they said about Polaris too.

>it takes a titan x to barely get past 60fps

well maybe i wont bother with this game afterall. Typical slants cant port anything to pc to save their life

>>58649309
What the fuck? Whenever i try running doom via vulcan the shit just crashes and gives me a bunch of graphics errors.

File: LELLLLLLLLLLLL.gif (3MB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x320px

>>58635330
ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY FIVE more frames per second than anyone actually needs

hahaha you bunch of tech faggots crack me up

>>58647206
You are not even reading the graph.

>>58649818
Found it, gameshardware.de

File: smugsoma.png (1MB, 783x719px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 783x719px

>>58649812
good goy. Don't forget to buy the next titan x™ a few months from now because we will gimp your hardware as hard as possible.

>>58647206
>NVIDIA WON
>can't even read the chart
top kek, this is amazing.

>>58647496
WAS priced. It's a previous generation card released in September of 2014. The RX480 was released in June of 2016.
If AMD could sell the 480 at 700 quid, they would.

>>58650335
I mean, you could just get the comparable Radeon card - the literally never happened
or you know, one that can match the 1070/1080
the Radeon - plz wait for next arch
or the one where drivers don't explode
the radeon from 1999

>>58650335
Yea that's not going to happen. Went from 390X to TitanX so no need to do some bullshit like that. GoodLuck with Vagina or Vega whatever you want to call it.

>>58650647
>unironically buying Titan*
I don't know how Nvidia did it, but they have somehow brainwashed meatbags just as well if not better than Applel.

>>58634636
"As you can see the 1060 offers performance comparable to our last gen flagship the 980ti with a fraction of the power consumption, what great value!"

>>58634636
there is so much concentrated cancer in this post that I can't even come up with a responce

>>58636270
this

>>58649872
the older cards themselves don't actually perform worse than they did at launch, they just have to deal with an inappropriate and unnecessary load from SOME games

how is this so hard for you to understand

File: unknown.png (94KB, 452x602px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 452x602px

Delet me

>>58650740
Can the brand loyalty wars stop for a second?

Which one is the real benchmark? I genuinely want to know. Because the card I want isn't based on brand, it's based on performance.

>>58650777
The fake benchmark is the one where the 470 performs better than the 1070.

>>58650777
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/resident_evil_7_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,6.html

>>58650777
most of the benchmarks shown have been real at one small stretch of time or another.

Nvidia's driver at launch was complete shit.
Their new one is drastically better, but the RX 470 still beats the 6GB GTX 1060.
AMD may or may not have performance improvements as well in their next driver release, we'll see.

I'm not sure why RE7 would be an important benchmark to deciding your purchase, but it looks like your reasonable range of choices are: RX 470, RX 480, GTX 1070, GTX 1080.

>>58650740
>now 470 4GB faster than Fury X
What in the actual fuck. Fuck this generation of game devs and consumers, the industry should just die and be rebuilt.

File: furyx.png (515KB, 1228x1268px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 1228x1268px

>>58651085
Fiji has real bottlenecks that might legitimately be hit besides the 4GB memory pool.

While it's stronger in nearly every other measure, Polaris 10 has at least 25% better geometry throughput thanks to same number of units plus the clock boost.

>>58650777

The newest one was not using new driver beside that came at launch the same time when RE7

This one >>58650740 if I'm not wrong still using current newest Nvidia driver but some setting turn down so it favor more to Nvidia.(it literally said that in the website)

But hey, retards in /g/ will called me a fanboy just for saying the truth.

>>58650777
Unless RE7 is the only game you're playing, you shouldn't base your decision off one benchmark.

470 is best price/perf
6GB 1060 / RX 480 8GB - whichever is cheaper

>>58635908
>DX12 is literally crap

File: eric-cartman-bravo.jpg (20KB, 350x318px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 350x318px

>>58650647
>she said vagina
zomfg anon, you so funny when you say fagina.

>>58635400
>halo 2

What? That game's nearly 13 years old.