I just noticed this change on Google images Thoughts?

>>58622205
Shit, as much as material design is shit.

>>58622246
Material design isnt shit

>>58622285
It is.

>>58622285
Most people are right handed, and increasingly large phones are common.

Knowing both of these things, why would you put the primary button for a large portion of the app's functionality in the upper left corner where they're forced to alter their grip or move their hand to reach it?

I'm left-handed, and as nice as it is for me, it's retarded for the vast majority of people.

>>58622326
not to mention in chrome, they made everything worse then it was before due to material

Looks like shit, not because of the material design but because the colors don't fit in with the the color scheme.

>>58622205
What's different?

>>58622205
Those buttons have been there for at least a year.

>>58622852
That's another problem, everybody's obsession with creating unified interfaces, when ultimately any phone friendly interface wastes space like a motherfucker on a desktop.

>>58623134
>when ultimately any phone friendly interface wastes space like a motherfucker on a desktop.
This isn't true whatsoever. Bad design wastes space. Good design can ultimately grow (or shrink) with screen size and still function phenomenally.

The real problem is with mobile devices. They're designing base interfaces so as not to step over their competitors patents or piss off loyalists. Apple got it right the first time, keep majority of app navigation at the bottom. Google got it right by keeping the back button at the bottom of the phone (either with hard/soft keys). However, they both get shit wrong by putting the back button at the top left, and a bunch of other silly design choices.

Desktop design has fucking stagnated and it's depressing. People have just given up trying. Opera Neon is so fascinating to me because at least it's trying some new fresh ideas.