Arch just werks

>god
That's what you get for your blasphemy.

My sentiments exactly.

File: aws.jpg (398KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1024x768px

>>58620949

DELET THIS

>screenshot
>paste into gimp
>new layer
>draw lines
>save
>upload to 4chan
>"lol arch sucks xDDD"
btw you forgot to draw lines at the bottom

File: 1476139086439.jpg (29KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1280x720px

>>58620949
>Archcucks say arch linux is minimalist yet uses far more packages than had you installed ubuntu net install

>>58621037
No this is a glitch when using gyazo I love arch im just not a shill who pretends its perfect

>>58620949
Arch works just fine. The mistake you made was assuming that the purpose of Arch was to have a functional Linux system. It isn't, you use Debian or Ubuntu or CentOS or Fedora or etc for that. The purpose of Arch is to give you something to fuck around with.

>>58621084
Im not an autist like you who would only install an OS based on it having nothing I like the package manager and AUR.

>>58621084
>more packages than had you installed ubuntu net install
lol how's that even fucking possible considering Ubuntu splits their packages (libx and libx-dev)?

>>58621037
whew lad

Moooom free up my schedule for the next week