>his headphone jack/charter is on the top of his phone
>>58616737
this is a good thing since you dont have to put your phone upside down in your pocket, you mong.
>>58616737
>his
did you just assume my gender?
>>58616752
This
>>58616769
>>58616752
But then if you grab it in your pocket it comes upside down in your hand.
>>58616752
who doesn't put their phone upside down in their pocket?
weirdos and morons, that's who
>>58616769
>>58616752
>defending ancient practices
And you can rest your phone on your stomach while using it without damaging the headphone wire
>>58616795
Not having a Nexus 6p and trying to assert knowledge over smart phones
>not using bluetooth headsets
They're literally $10 by the Wal-Mart registers now.
>pay $500 for a phone
>don't spend $10 on wireless headphones
>>58616752
>I like having to do a weird tango-ish dance with my phone for literally no other reason than the fact that the designers are retards!
>>58616822
>$35 wireless headphones that sound like $5 aux headphones
KEK, have fun listening to audio so compressed it sounds like you're listening to it via Dixie cups attached to strings. you paid for it.
>>58616803
>And you can rest your phone on your stomach while using it without damaging the headphone wire
We're not all fat.
>>58616737
Really, nigger? It makes you laugh this hard to see where someone else's phone has headphone ports?
>>58616737
I literally couldn't give less of a shit where the headphone jack is, as long as there is one.
>>58616909
well fuck me then
>>58616959
>headphone
>ports
>>58616822
>pay $500 for a phone
>pay $100 for quality in ears
That's how you do it, idiot. Wireless can not be quality btw. Bluetooth is barely sufficient to transmit voice chat.
Serious question: In a hypothetical situation where Apple finally did away with Lightning and moved iPhones to USB-C, and good USB-C headphones/earbuds were cheap, would you still care about the phone having a 3.5mm aux headphone jack?
fuck off apple cucks
>>58617034
>Wireless can not be quality btw.
Objectively untrue, but CHEAP Bluetooth audio probably won't be very high-quality. If you're willing to spend a bit more on a good headset, like the Jaybuds X2, for example, the difference in sound is completely minimal.
>>58617036
Not as long as it has at least two USB jacks.
>>58617036
No.
>>58617061
Two USB ports would be unnecessary since wireless charging and data transfer would, I assume, be more efficient by the time that hypothetical scenario played out, anyway.
I use a SanDisk Clip for music so i don't give a shit.
Why aren't there any phones with the headphone jack on the side?
>>58616737
>mfw he doesn't have a headphone jack
>>58617121
This. I bought one of those Riuzu X2s when my Sansaclip died and its just as good. For £8. £8!
>>58617085
>wireless charging
Only if the phone is placed on the charger
>>58617205
I don't get that meme. It's even less functional than with a wire. Is it faster or something?
>>58617279
You don't wear out the port, and you don't have to plug it in. You just set it down and it's charging. Literally most people get a new phone only when their ports stop working or the phone breaks.
>>58617310
But you can't use it
>>58617310
The problem is that you might want to charge while holding it in your hand and doing stuff with it.
>>58617378
>>58617364
Most people aren't autistic kids that use their phone as their primary computing device. Shitposting ain't normal.
>>58617533
Are you kidding me? Have you ever gone outside within the past five years?
>>58617533
Are you really that retarded? What about browsing in bed?
>>58616822
>Not using a bluetooth hat
Scrubs.
>>58616752
Uh why not? Otherwise you have to swivel it when putting it in and taking it out.
t. Someone with a headphone jack on the top of their phone
>>58617533
Oh the stupidity... How is something like you even allowed to exist?
>>58617533
dafuq man, y u so retarded?
>>58616752
Mine has the jack on top, but I carry it top-down in me pocket.
>>58617187
What's that thing you put where the dollar sign is supposed to be?