For what purpose?
>not even an octacore
ayyy
>>58610789
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/484/Intel_Celeron_Dual-Core_G3920_vs_Intel_Core_2_Quad_Q9550.html
>>58610789
they're still good for browsing and sub 4k multimedia
you can even do some light PS
>>58611446
are they good at browsing dlb?
>>58610831
ahmed, pls
are the phenom ii x4 better?
>>58613158
A Phenom II x4 965 BE is about on par with an i5 750, so yes.
>>58613158
the phenoms are still listed as usable for minimum requirements on game debate's future proof
>>58613296
Nah. Nehalem is faster than Deneb clock for clock.
I still have X5460 quad in my computer. My compute is almost 10 years old ...I upgraded to the xeon about 3 years ago for $18
works alright
>>58614377
Those old x58 xeons are impeccable value.
>>58610789
For processing? Hell I'm using a Core 2 Duo right now.
>>58615005
I have two xeon 5140. Are those somehow valuable or total crap?
Pic related.
>>58610831
>4 cores unused despite lots of RAM usage
>i totally didnt fall for a meme!