Is Antergos a distro or an installer?

>>58604285
A distro and an installer.
A distro installer if you will

Does it use the Arch repos? If it does I consider it an installer.

Same with all the different *buntus.

>>58604285
It's an installer and an **additional** repo (priority repo, although you can change it)

>>58604285
It blurs the line between the two. It's like 99% Arch though.

>>58604939
this
It's easy as fuck to install and it doesn't introduce stupid problems like failjaro

Does Antergos have a netinstall? I hate some of their customizations,especially the login screen.

>>58605079
Manjaro has less steps to go from radeon to catalyst though, because they designed it with that in mind.

>>58605099

Well, it does have a minimal ISO:

https://antergos.com/try-it/#

and I think you should be able to better customize your system.

>>58605194
Hey, thanks! Just what I wanted!

>>58604285
It's not l33t enough for the right-proper Arch user.

>>58605286
whats the point of using antergos in that case though, instead of just installing arch?

File: Screenshot from 2017-01-22 20-23-09.png (182KB, 1282x578px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1282x578px

>>58605339
Where is your RMS now?

>>58605369
It would give me more options.These Arch installers don't give the freedom of choice I would like and I'm sick of installing Arch the Arch Way.

>>58604285
it's distro/installer, or as i like to call it distro+installer

>>58605528
Then Antergos is the way to go. Enjoy a distro with the ease of more popular choices but the power and cutting edge of arch.

>>58604939
Yes