>2017 >not using waterfox plebs

>>58604187

t. Alex Kontos

>>58604187
The gay sex tab haha
I use firefox-esr

>>58604187
>not ungoogled-chromium
DROPPED
R
O
P
P
E
D

>>58604323
Ungoogled botnet

File: t3_5lvpm7.jpg (223KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 750x1334px

>>58604323
>trusting anything related to the botnet
pleb

>>58604314
>>58604187
I think the extended support Release (ESR) is better
And all other nightly are less stable

File: 899a1524ea493c0abbfd3aaa1c67f9947fd851367fab85c1371248df7c4690c6.jpg (41KB, 525x551px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 525x551px

>>58604187
>700M/ 32G
Get that RAM to work!

>>58604187
Somebody care to explain why htop displays so many processes for firefox?

>>58604187
I'm still on vanilla Firefox. What are the benefits of Waterfox or any of the other forks?
Is it less bloated? Is it still compatible with most addons? Does it use less memory? Etc.

>>58604645
Logo changed bruh
Everything change bruh

>>58604187
What desktop theme are you using, senpai?

>>58604645
>Built with Clang-cl (even linux builds)
>No Adobe DRM
>No Pocket
>No data collection
>Run every Add-On (even unsigned ones)
>More under the hood changes...

>>58604738
>Disabled Encrypted Media Extensions (EME)
>Disabled the 64-Bit NPAPI white-list so that the user can decide what plugins they can run
>Removal of Sponsored Tiles on New Tab Page

>>58604738
I think i have the same on ESR but not shure about the adobe DRM

>tfw using Edge on Windows 10 without most of the telemetry disabled

this is like your 5th waterfox shill post in as many days, it's time to stop.

placebos are supposed to be for controlled trials, not shilling on /g/

>>58604711
gtk-theme-name="Arc-Grey-Dark"
gtk-icon-theme-name="Numix-Square"
gtk-font-name="xos4 Terminus 10"
tint2 with custom theme and numix openbox theme

kinda shitty tbqh but eh to lazy.

.Xresources:

#define base00 #151718
#define base01 #8ec43d
#define base02 #3B758C
#define base03 #41535B
#define base04 #43a5d5
#define base05 #d6d6d6
#define base06 #eeeeee
#define base07 #ffffff
#define base08 #Cd3f45
#define base09 #db7b55
#define base0A #e6cd69
#define base0B #9fca56
#define base0C #55dbbe
#define base0D #55b5db
#define base0E #a074c4
#define base0F #8a553f

*.foreground:   base05
*.background:   base00
*.cursorColor:  base05
*.geometry: 137x44

*.color0:       base00
*.color1:       base08
*.color2:       base0B
*.color3:       base0A
*.color4:       base0D
*.color5:       base0E
*.color6:       base0C
*.color7:       base05

*.color8:       base03
*.color9:       base09
*.color10:      base01
*.color11:      base02
*.color12:      base04
*.color13:      base06
*.color14:      base0F
*.color15: base07

>>58604812
i'm not the originally waterfox shill but another shill who's been using waterfox.

File: THanks_fb_28684.jpg (20KB, 300x290px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 300x290px

>>58604846

I just tried it and it does seem to handle html5 better, at least it doesn't have an aneurysm when I try to open a few youtube videos at once.

I'll keep using it for now. Will report my findings in the next waterfox shill thread.

>>58604187
>2017-01-22T20:10:10.533+0100
>not using Airfox or Earthfox

File: 1484990146712.png (106KB, 190x247px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 190x247px

>>58604187
>Nostalrius Begins

>>58605144
yeah i've noticed that too. i can easily handle 10+ youtube videos at once.

>>58604514
> Somebody care to explain why htop displays so many processes for firefox?
If there was such a thing as multi-threading in Shitfox that would mean its processes (one process per tab + plugins + tools). If one crashes you won't feel it.

>>58604187
>gay sex
explain op

File: file.png (152KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1366x768px

>implying i'm not using the best browser, waterfox

>>58604187
firefox dev is faster

>>58607874
It is what it is.

File: 1484887236197.jpg (179KB, 780x1102px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 780x1102px

>>58604388
>mfw
and wwe're the freaks?

File: xH8deaP.jpg (66KB, 460x548px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 460x548px

>>58610290
yes.

>>58604323
When shills collide

>>58607892
I like your rice set up, could you give me the details?

>>58607892
How'd you make it integrate with gtk3 like that?

File: tegaki.png (7KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 400x400px

>>58611543
XFCE4 with Mire v2 GTK3, paper gtk icon set, and for firefox, tree style tabs, htitle, hide caption titlebar plus

>>58604187
They should have named it Waterwolf

>>58611558
read >>58611579
firefox addons
it's not actually integrated like nautilus/etc

>>58611579
was mire v2 gtk3 updated recently cause last i saw its been a few years.

>>58611676
no

File: 1484665854428.jpg (103KB, 964x964px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 964x964px

>>58604187
This is one dedicated shill. So many threads since yesterday about Waterfox.

>>58607892
How do you remove the title bar from firefox in Linux?

>>58604187
>not naming it waterwolf so it fits the alliteration, like firefox does
You had one fucking job

>>58604709
/thread

Is there a version like Waterfox for Mac? I know Camino used to be a thing but no any more...