Isn't saying "C/C++" wrong?

No worse than "Java/JavaScript"

>>58601603
Technically yes, but hairsplitting about such unimportant stuff that actually says nothing is far beyond functional autism.

>>58601603
Yes, but Windows code monkeys don't know the difference because most Windows APIs are available through either of those, many "programmers" don't really even know what the VS build button does (to be fair, the application's design doesn't really help) and much of C-style Windows code used to be full of MSVC C++-isms anyway.

>>58601603
If your software works with either of those it's not wrong at all. Which is achievable with a few ifdefs, though I don't know why someone would want to use C++ for microcontrolers.

>>58601615
Java/JavaScript is A LOT worse.

>>58601695
Y'know, it's like

>Car/Carpet
>Car/Carnival

completely reasonable grouping

>>58601603
C and C++ are distinct languages, but C++ is more of a superset of C than a unique language. So, most C programs will correctly compile through a C++ compiler, but not the other way around.

But there are lots of little inconsistencies between the two which keep them distinct.

>>58601615 -> >>58601695
Java and JavaScript, on the other hand, are completely unique languages and are used totally differently. The only similarity is the word "java" in their names.

>>58601615
>>58601649
>>58601652
>>58601683
>>58601695
>>58601741
>>58601747

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as C++, is in fact, C/C++, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, C+C++.

>>58601747
>The only similarity is the word "java" in their names.
And for a completely retarded reason too, fuck Netscape or whoever was responsible for that shitty decision.

>>58601779
do the whole thing.

>>58601779
C+C++

This is terrible

I've been looking for resources for C+ for days now and I'm beginning to think you've memed me

File: 1484592030-55286-587cea30c36188dd558b45e6-450x250.jpg (22KB, 450x250px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 450x250px

>>58601779

> C+C++.

>>58601779
>C+C++

C+C+++C#