boot time thread

>over 10 seconds
You must be using an ayymd cpoo

>>58592580
Startup finished in 2.066s (kernel) + 1.322s (initrd) + 3.381s (userspace) = 6.770s

>>58592580
>systemd

am i being trolled or are you seriously this dumb OP?

File: boot.png (81KB, 738x440px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 738x440px

you won.

>>58592622
systemd boots faster then other init systems due to the fact that it's a huge back door so it can use the cloud to serialize personal information leaks.

File: 2016-04-05-143201_1920x1080_scrot.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

what do I win

File: smug.png (26KB, 884x599px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 884x599px

>>58592580

>Startup finished in 4.839s (kernel) + 38.770s (userspace) = 43.610s
shit

Startup finished in 2.499s (kernel) + 1.700s (userspace) = 4.200s

>>58592674

Also known as "parallelization".

Startup finished in 1.828s (kernel) + 790ms (userspace) = 2.619s

What are you niggers doing?

>>58592687
>>58592693
>>58592709
>>58592697
reminder that if you aren't using EFI it doesn't take your post time into account

>>58592686
A free suicide

>>58592693
DUDE

File: 1470732434293.png (46KB, 619x453px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 619x453px

>>58592622
what's wrong with systemd?

>>58592772
autism

>>58592686
>man
>85% of the boot time
da shit?
Also, how?

>>58592780
very carefully haha

>>58592700
no other init system can parallelilize boot processes. you need a multi-megabyte binary compiled from a million lines of code to do it.

File: ub.png (74KB, 818x485px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 818x485px

i tried

>>58592806
Nevermind, I don't care.

>>58592674
you trippin dog

Startup finished in 3.927s (firmware) + 4.969s (loader) + 8.634s (kernel) + 16.641s (userspace) = 34.172s

At least it doesn't take actual minutes to boot lmao. I'm guessing booting from an SSD would make the biggest difference?

I suck

>Startup finished in 5.874s (kernel) + 17.053s (userspace) = 22.927s

Startup finished in 1.991s (kernel) + 1.111s (userspace) = 3.103s

>all these ubuntufags with sub-3rd world boot times

Startup finished in 5.801s (kernel) + 12.221s (userspace) = 18.023s

>>58592780
https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/36fqzh/updatedbservice_and_mandbservice_increases_boot/ :^)

>>58592973
Yes. People using a HDD will have noticeably slower boot times than people using an SSD.

Startup finished in 2.601s (kernel) + 898ms (userspace) = 3.500s

>>58592580

Startup finished in 13.298s (firmware) + 1.966s (loader) + 2.141s (kernel) + 1.859s (userspace) = 19.266s

601ms dev-sda3.device
           378ms systemd-journal-flush.service
           239ms systemd-journald.service
           223ms NetworkManager.service

What am I doing wrong? This is with a SSD already.

Startup finished in 1.937s (kernel) + 12.338s (userspace) = 14.276s

how can i run this program on windows?

>>58593119
you need to rename system32 as systemd and delete the contents of the folder so that systemd can initialize on reboot

>>58593119
delete system32 xdddddddddd

>>58593160
>>58593172
ok thanks guys, gonna reboot and report back with startup time

Any way to measure boot time with OpenRC?

File: boot.png (19KB, 962x578px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 962x578px

tfw fell for the SSD meme

>all these non-UEFI fags

It doesn't take into account the firmware part.

>>58593333
i'm not replacing my mobo just so i can see how many microseconds it takes to get through it

Startup finished in 3.076s (firmware) + 39ms (loader) + 1.692s (kernel) + 770ms (userspace) = 5.578s

I could shave off 2 seconds if I instructed the BIOS not to wait, but then if I needed to get into BIOS I would have to mash the key like a retard, so meh.

>>58592772
Don't ask that to people who hate systemd, not even they know why they hate it.

>>58593096
If you'd look at the fucking output you'd see it's all spent in your MOBO's firmware. Go into the settings and make sure that fastboot is enabled.

systemd-analyze: command not found

I don't know, OP.

>>58592580
Startup finished in 11.262s (firmware) + 179ms (loader) + 2.660s (kernel) + 2.141s (userspace) = 16.244s

>>58592580

~> systemd-analyze
fish: Unknown command 'systemd-analyze'

Oh well.

>>58592580
Server: Startup finished in 2.072s (kernel) + 11.132s (userspace) = 13.204s

Main PC: Startup finished in 2.297s (kernel) + 1.318s (userspace) = 3.615s

>>58592580
Startup finished in 2.749s (kernel) + 687ms (userspace) = 3.436s

>>58592622
Spotted the old sysadmin neckbeard wizard

>>58593938
>fish
wew lad

>>58592580
Of course, creates boot time thread and uses debian system for first post. /s

>>58592693
>>58592726
Startup finished in 3.701s (kernel) + 47.943s (userspace) = 51.645s

Do I kill myself now or later

File: explorer_2017-01-21_20-57-03.png (60KB, 1107x639px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1107x639px

>>58592580

Startup finished in 1.805s (firmware) + 18ms (loader) + 6.813s (kernel) + 713ms (userspace) = 9.350s

I just placed a 500gb ssd in my laptop today.
It's blazing fast but for some reason the kernel takes ages to load for me.
Does anyone know how to trim it down? I already checked dmesg to see if I could find an issue.

>>58594633
debian based?

>>58594642
No. Running a fresh Arch install.
This is my only machine that takes this long to load the kernel.

>>58594660
that's weird
probably some specific kernel module that it's loading

>>58592808
openrc can just dosent by default

>>58594674
I already guessed so. That would leave me the choice of recompiling the kernel every time just for a couple of seconds faster boot times or live with it I'm afraid.

>>58594394
How do I get this program?

>>58594737

Here: http://www.thewindowsclub.com/windows-boot-timer

Startup finished in 1.811s (firmware) + 2.668s (loader) + 1.220s (kernel) + 3.706s (initrd) + 25.892s (userspace) = 35.299s.

9.344s systemd-udev-settle.service
8.686s dev-mapper-fedora\x2droot.device
4.739s firewalld.service
4.380s udisks2.service
4.104s lvm2-monitor.service
3.445s systemd-journal-flush.service
3.018s lvm2-pvscan@8:10.service
3.017s chronyd.service
2.761s rsyslog.service
2.685s multipathd.service
2.511s systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service

What do I win? It used to be double that.

about 30 seconds, 22 of which is thanks to >x58

File: boots.png (105KB, 960x531px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 960x531px

5.5 seconds.

Do I win?

>>58596410
>>58592686

>>58596427
Shit has me beat by like half a second.

Fucking ThinkPad firmware is too slow.

File: 1481931604043.png (238KB, 520x700px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 520x700px

>>58592686
wut distro u runnin gurl

Startup finished in 53.149s (kernel) + 1min 28.780s (userspace) = 2min 21.929s

Got an external EMC array with 20 disks hooked to this.
Any way to speed it up?

File: disgust_nitori.jpg (584KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1024x768px

>systemd

>>58596468
Switch to Linux I guess.

>>58594660
Systemd-analyze blame

>>58596451
arch but it's lame
install macOS

>>58592686
de/wm??

>>58598516
openbox + tint2

File: __matsuno_choromatsu_matsuno_ichimatsu_matsuno_juushimatsu_matsuno_karamatsu_matsuno_osomatsu_and_others_osomatsu_kun_osomatsu_san_and_the_creation_of_adam_drawn_by_mery_apfl0515__80832637cbb92f95ccaa1f129a3f9e14.png (599KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 1200x800px

>>58596451
that artist... i can't even.

he/she draws girls as cute as buttons, but there's a lot of what in between

File: 1469758534469.jpg (30KB, 600x518px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 600x518px

>9.485s NetworkManager-wait-online.service

File: Screenshot from 2017-01-22 08-20-14.png (78KB, 762x495px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 762x495px

>>58592580
How'd I do?

>>58592687
oh fuck mate post PS1?

>>58596983
any ideas on how to install OSX on a precision 3510 with switchable AMD graphics ? it's stumped me for the last few weeks. Cant even get to the first apple logo on screen

>>58599981
you might just be out of luck, sorry
google your exact model + hackintosh and you might find a guide

>>58599998
i did, and everyone laughed at the idea of OSX on swicthable graphics :( annoyingly it works fine when i pull out this firepro MXM card, but the firepro is the only reason i would want to hackintosh it anyway, dead end

>>58599981
>running OS X on AMD
Kek

>>58600019
you realise you can run OSX on AMD hardware right ? just not on switchable accelerator style GPU's

>>58600037
no bullying

>>58592580
My system takes 25 seconds between the POST and the desktop fully loaded. I'm using an HDD btw

>>58600028
anon is right, hackintosh is no probs on AMD hardware as long as its a discrete GPU and the integrated GPU has nothing to do with it. currently running a hackintosh at work with an i7 4790s and an R9 270, using AMD/ATI injection in clover, works fine, native 1280x1024 at 75hz

>>58600060
>R9 270
>1280x1024
lol

>>58600067
i knew you would like that :) it's at work, where im a computer systems engineer, where combinations like 4:3 monitors and old gaming cards and hackintoshes are a normal thing. please dont go thinking this monster hackintosh is my personal rig

File: 1484276094333.png (109KB, 1154x774px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1154x774px

>>58592686
You're fucking slow.

get on my level, kohai.

>>58600090
based on those numbers hers is faster
post the full output

File: 2017-01-22-114821_631x282_scrot.png (45KB, 631x282px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 631x282px

>over 20 seconds

>>58593172
fuck off, jack

>>58600097
that's it. I run LUKS so the time when I have to type in my password is also counted.

I also mount a bunch of external volumes as well.

this is an i7 Skylake with an SSD. it's fast as hell.

>>58600118
yeah well based on those numbers it's still slower, and you aren't even showing kernel, firmware, etc times
sorry kid
>[email protected]
>715ms vs 40ms
lol

>>58600086
loool, that moment when an actual professional walks into /g/ and starts fucking neckbeards in the ass :D

>>58599137
It looks like gnzh theme from zsh.

>>58600126
Do you even know what that does, you stupid cunt?

>>58600172
it goes slow in ur case xD

>>58600175
shrekt

>>58600134
hahaaaaaaaaaaa

>>58600175
you're retarded. if you don't do anything with your computer, of course it's fast. I'm not going to explain it to you what it does since you're dumber that shit. go look it up on your own and learn a thing or two.

>>58600194
slow

File: 1467106678557.jpg (48KB, 517x610px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 517x610px

>Startup finished in 2.268s (kernel) + 28.814s (initrd) + 3min 11.672s (userspace) = 3min 42.754s
>LUKS 30 sec

>3min 388ms abrtd.service

>>58596954
systemd-analyze blame only lists the time of processes in userspace, not the kernel.

If you want to look into what the kernel is doing you need to look at dmesg.

File: screenFetch-2017-01-22_13-21-42.png (246KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1600x900px

> memepad t430

>>58592580
>he reboots his OS
>ever

File: Screenshot from 2017-01-22 22-26-19.png (96KB, 1040x525px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1040x525px

>not falling for 16gb ram meme
>not falling for ssd meme
>not falling for antergos meme
>not falling for 4k meme
>not falling for amd meme
>not falling for i3wm meme

>>58596410
Fuck off, useless tripfag

File: laughing steveo.jpg (32KB, 453x500px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 453x500px

>>58600097
>based on those numbers hers is faster
>hers

>>58592580
Startup finished in 4.104s (kernel) + 20.927s (userspace) = 25.032s

>tfw hdd

>>58600496
yes, she's a girl
do you have a problem with that for some reason?

>>58592580
>ITT: systemd users brag about their backdoor

>Startup finished in 8.799s (kernel) + 13.343s (userspace) = 22.143s

it takes 11seconds doing hardrive things do

File: 2017-01-22-134626_802x342_scrot.png (16KB, 802x342px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 802x342px

>>58592580

>>58592686
thats sexy
i want to put that image in a pendrive and stick it in my cunt