1440p IPS Gsync Monitors Wait to see what 2017 has to offer

>>58572236
This year is when the better 4k monitors are set to be launched.
Ive had my PG278q for a while and not had an issue with it. I got it mainly as a stop gap until they give us some half decent 4k screens

File: 1484590781818.jpg (37KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 633x758px

>>58572290

>>58572290
jhulia_pimentel on ig

>>58572317
>3d
ew

>>58572272
rollan

>>58572329
>9
tumblerina hipster with rough anal being the only redeeming factor.
>no influence points
topbeta
>23
I become an sjw and stop sodomizing her.
>>58572314
joining

How about you go to /v/ you fucking manchild

>>58572236
Wait for the Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ

>>58572372
/g/ - Technology. I believe he is in the correct place to be asking.
How bout you go outside you autistic spazz

>>58572427
>referring to yourself in the third person

>>58572236
>1440p IPS Gsync Monitors
IMO wait for HDR10

>>58572236
> Gsync
No. Do not support proprietary standards.
> 1440p
I've already got 2560x1600. And I want to stick with 16:10.

>>58572434
>>58572427
>>58572236

Im not OP.

>>58572468
Then why are you such a faggot?

>>58572500
I wasnt the one being a knob. That was you.
Also well done on being so wrong on me being Op mr fuckwit.

>>58572511
Actually, I just jumped in to the conversation to call you a faggot, because you denied being OP.

>>58572439
true hdr10 capable monitor will cost like 1800$

the new Asus hdr capable monitor still isn't fully HDR capable.

the standards transceds over 10000 nits which is only available on few tv's.

to get the best quality out of an HDR (stream) capable device you need more years to come

i'd just get whatever quantum dot comes first with desired specs. a native hardware color enhancement is better than any HDR content

>I had to send it back three times
How about you kill yourself? Backlight bleed is hardly noticeable unless you're in complete darkness AND viewing a very dark image.

>>58572566
+ inducing eye cancer with 100% backlight brightness which is unecessary on almost all kind of monitors

>>58572555
>1000 nits
completely unneccessary though

I mean I have my displays at 50 nits currently. The important part is the low black point, and then if you can go up to maybe 300 nits or so on top of that it would be more than fine for a computer monitor

>true hdr10 capable monitor will cost like 1800$
PG27UQ will cost $2000, yeah

>>58572555
>the standards transceds over 10000 nits which is only available on few tv's.
Standard only goes up to 10k nits actually, and afaik no device can do that at all currently

Even the pro devices are only sitting at like 2000 nits. This brightness war is stupid though

>>58572544
Fuck, reroll.

>>58572434
>no u!!!
fucking kill yourself

GSync = HDDVD

>>58573365
Reroll

>>58573368
Class rep. Perfect. I'm happy

File: 1483758225123.jpg (2MB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2000px

>Goy-Sync

>>58572236
SAAAAUCE

>>58572236
Last time I checked, all 27 inch 1440p 144Hz IPS monitors use the same panel. And they're all plagued by QC issues.

The safe choice would be to get a Dell S2716DG, which is unfortunately TN, but you'll get Dell quality and customer service. That's what I did.

>>58573545
I love you poor people who pull the jew card out as you cant afford the good stuff and thus have to buy the inferior instead

>>58572236
>(nothing a t CES was that impressive though
>4K 144Hz IPS, GSync, HDR, 384 backlight dimming regions, quantum dot backlight
If you're waiting for OLED or actual quantum dot screens to be impressed, you're going to be waiting for a long time.

Waiting on an ultrawide OLED panel.

File: 1465117201854.png (66KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 400x400px

>>58572236
Wait for 2017... Some will come with better standards such as quantum dot or maybe... Just maybe oled