Is it ok to use Debian as a desktop OS?

>>58558841
Not really, just use Arch.

>>58558841
If it does not limit you in using it in a desktop OS, why not?

>>58558841
Are you comfortable with 5 year old packages?

She looks like a mongrel.

yes. it just works... KDE master race here.

>>58558841
she actually looks like the beast on her sweater.

spooky

Is that the exhibitionist who wore the really short light up shorts to a few events?

>>58558962
yes, and see through LCD shutter tops

>>58558962
Yeah, that's the dude who likes to show off his big ol fake titties

>>58558841
Yes.
Stable as fuck.
I used it for a bit before I switched to sabayon.

>>58558962
You mean sexycyborg?

>>58558903

Probably is

Yeah, it's good. It took me a bit of work to configure stuff (sound and touchpad mostly) but that could have been because it was early in the cycle for testing or because I did a minimal install and I was missing some important packages. If you do a default install of your favourite desktop environment it's probably fine. Stretch has gotten a lot more stable and polished and it'll be released in a couple months, so it's a good time to get pretty new software that won't change for a long time.

>>58559069
Yes this is exactly her.

>>58558852
what actual improvements does Arch have? I can customize just as much of debian and I don't have to worry about it breaking

>>58559269
Arch is blue though.

>>58558962
yeah that footslut

>>58558962
pics
i
c
s

>>58559316
google
o
o
g
l
e

>>58559316
you don't want any, them fake tits are nasty