> Perfect programming languages don't ex...

I'd love to see elixir solve a problem that can't be solvable reasonably in every other modern language.

>>58519802
Does it have a code of conduct or any sjw in the dev team?
If yes then it's garbage

>>58519838
scalable web apps with excellent performance
>>58519857
no

>>58519878
>scalable web apps with excellent performance
Nice. I'm convinced.

>>58519802
I support this thread.

Elixir is very comfy.

Elixir + Phoenix is the future of web

Disclaimer I have never used Elixir whatsoever

>>58519802
>functionnal language
retard proof
>webdev
retard magnet

hoepfully the repulsive effect will be stronger than the magnet effect and we will see well-designed webapps for once

>>58519802
>>58519958
>>58519999


Elixir+Rust+ES6/ES7 can solve 99% of all non-embedded needs.

The golden age of software development is near.

>>58520556
+Go

>>58520089
(Un)fortunately elixir is retard friendly even though it is functional

File: laughingInPain.jpg (56KB, 800x804px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 800x804px

>>58519802
>calling a dynamically typed language perfect

>>58519878
>scalable web apps with excellent performance
Go?

>>58520556
nice "stack" (cringes), bro.

File: 1475807663868.jpg (8KB, 284x339px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 284x339px

Languages are all good, it's crappy programming logic that kills.

>>58520616
>Go
Literally a step back in terms of language design. The only thing it has going for it is ease of learning, ease of creating zero-dependency binaries on multiple platforms (this is the big reason I use go), and a great standard library.
None of these have anything to do with language design.

In terms of performance: It hardly beats out nodejs, which is really fucking sad.

>>58521936
>In terms of performance: It hardly beats out nodejs, which is really fucking sad.
You have a source for that? Everything I've read says otherwise

File: 1388535441261.jpg (217KB, 717x960px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 717x960px

>>58520556
Wow you are a snowflake aren't u? . I went in the useful direction... gnu, Linux cli, vb, c, perl, php, pdo, python, net, *sql's, java, js, jquery, html5, css3, angular js, specializing in hippa compliance, securities and crm development.

>>58520043
I've never even heard of but I agree.
There's nothing like it

>>58522783
Kek. I was a compliance auditor once. It's nothing to brag about mate.

Looks half decent, I love multi paradigm languages but it doesn't really bring anything new to the table. F#, scala and ocaml are my main languages until something truly ground breaking comes along.

>>58519802
I really like Elixir and Phoenix but both Erlang and Elixir are ridiculously slow for anything CPU bound. Even slower than Ruby. If you're just building a dumb web service it's great though.

>>58521936
>In terms of performance: It hardly beats out nodejs, which is really fucking sad.

are you actually retarded

>>58520671
>doesn't know how computers actually work: the post

>>58521913
>implying VB.net is good

>>58523860
>doesn't know how computers actually work: the post

>>58521847
butthurt node.js dev alert

>>58523754
>>58522282
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/

The reason you *think* nodejs is slow is because you read CPU benchmarks, not IO benchmarks. Guess what's more important for a webserver?
Also almost all the benchmarks I've read comparing cpu are somewhat unfair: nodejs is single threaded by design, preferring multi-process over multi-threaded.
I haven't noticed a massive difference between the two performance wise if you have a nodejs cluster.

>>58519802
But is it
W E B S C A L E
?

> Erlang

Nope.

>>58521936

> IT'S NOT PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY. HELLO... IT'S 2016 YOUR FUCKING BIGOT

End yourself.

File: 1483814776306-g.jpg (8KB, 250x230px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x230px

>>58521936
>mfw nobody attacked you on the design part because it's true that go is a purposefully nerfed language to reign in Google employees

>>58519802
>le flavor of the month language with garbage web framework for autismo numale coders offering no benefits over existing languages framework pairs

>>58528148
>using that many buzzwords to convey that simple an idea
End yourself.

File: fuck_your_shit.jpg (13KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 400x225px

>>58519802
>no OOP
Why did I even bother looking it up?

lambda calculus is the closest to a 'perfect' programming language we have

Is that the new C logo?

>>58519802
Yeah they do.
>implying assembly isn't a programming language

>>58530037
It's not a high level programming language, but it still qualifies since it does some facilities over the instruction set.

>>58522822
I just now heard about it and i can confirm it's the future of not only just programming languages but holds the key to unlocking all the secrets of the universe as well.

>>58519878
Literally EVERYTHING scales these days. You can even make Ruby scale if you throw enough resources at it.

Modern web is micro services and single page apps anyway.