Let's settle this once and for all, /g/: Manjaro or Antergos?
>>58514518
that's arch
>>58514518
just use arch/parabola
arch
Antergos
I like Antergos, others like Manjaro.
It scarcely matters.
arch
>>58514518
>>58514533
>>58514546
>Arch
Nod an argumend :DDD
Arch
>no 32bit image for antergos
into the trash it goes, I need muh 32 bit support for old shitboxes
>>58514518
Between those 2, antergos. It still uses arch repos, and it's fairly easy to undo all the "antergos mods"
>>58514586
Agreed.
Having a motto like "for everyone" without 32 bit support is extremely ironic.
gentoo
>>58514555
>>58514669
>which is better, shit version of arch or shit version of arch
>get mad when told to just use fucking arch
>>58514518
I've never used Antergos but I assume Manjaro will have the same printer problems because of the stupid fucking package manager.
>not using Arch anywhere or reading the wiki
>>58514727
>doesn't answer the threads question properly
>doesn't understand that Arch is not an option
>still says "Arch"
>thins I'm mad
Wew, lad.
WINDOWS 10
>>58514789
EBIN XDDD
>>58514518
Antergos.
>>58514518
>install Manjaro
Everythin just werks.
>>58514518
Arch
>>58514518
Arch anywhere
>>58515062
Kawaii
>>58514518
>>58514586
I use the last i686 install disc (minimal)
It still works, but you have to refresh the repos before starting the install.
When it stops working I'll join the Manjaro side of Arch.
>>58514518
what the fuck is the point of using either of them? why do they even exist? for what purpose?
There's also the Architect installter, which IMO is still the best option and works without any problem even though it's quite outdated
https://sourceforge.net/projects/architect-linux/
>>58515326
The answer is simple, Anon: MALGA - Make Arch Linux Great Again.
>womanjaro
>can'tergos
>>58515355
>womanjaro
What does that even mean?
>>58514586
i686 support is in the process of being dropped. The only hope is that you get a team put together that will support it as a secondary architecture.
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2017-January/028629.html
Gentoo
>>58515387
Fuck.
I hate being poor.
>>58515338
>works without any problem
sadly, that isn't true.
i couldn't do a LUKS encrypted install on t420. when booting, it didnt find the root partition.
>>58515387
what about 32bit wine? will it work?
Get real Arch, niggers.
>>58515650
I'd assume it will continue to be built for x86-64 using the multilib repository as it is now.