what mouse does /g/ prefer ?

File: steelseries_rival700_img6.jpg (51KB, 1250x700px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1250x700px

Gimmick as fuck, but damn is it awesome to use.

>>58483316
the mouse /g/ loves to hate, a rat. Godawful palm mouse but pretty comfy for fingertip

File: 1457792183356.jpg (42KB, 500x299px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x299px

kensington mouse-in-a-box. doesn't chafe the surface of whatever you put it on like crap heavy burdensome feeling microsoft mouse. no stupit light from inside of mouse
"oh thanks for a peek at that atrocious red light thru the back of the mouse m-soft really needed that, important for me to know."
lmoa grow up wat is this two thousand & two? kensington mouse in the box SEXEY profile fits ALL needs feels GREAT my fav used to be logitech m100 it had a thinner cord but crapped out on me with the infamouse logitech double click issue, the piece of shit.

File: 81KEmSVAhQL._SL1500_.jpg (140KB, 814x1500px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 814x1500px

Still rocking my /g/400. The current G series of mice are basically the same shit, except with a gaymen aesthetic. I'd still buy a G402 because the leds can be turned off. I don't game as much as I used to, and don't really like the "precision button" on the new Logitech G series.

>>58484031
The LED in the G402 cannot be turned off, only lowered. It might be a bug, but if you put it at the lowest setting, it's not actually turned off. It still emits a very low amount of light that can be seen in darkness.

Overall, it's also a worse mouse than the G400.

>>58483316
Zowie FK1. If your mouse isn't plug and play then YGSIU.

File: roccastSavu.jpg (105KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1920x1080px

cheapest mouse with perfect sensor I could find
It's not great but gets the job done.

Is there a good mouse with a pinky rest out there?

>>58483316
G602

Can feel a bit heavy at time but is good

There are a variety of technical and non-technical terms used in describing mice and mouse sensors. This post aims to help people dive in without having to lurk forever, and also a place to point when people misuse words.

"Perfect sensor" is a phrase used to describe sensors that are Good Enough that you can ignore any problems they have. It's impossible to have a 100% completely perfect sensor. Perfect sensors are assumed to have only low amounts of acceleration, jitter, and smoothing, and a reasonably high tracking speed.

"Perfect tracking speed" is the point below which a given mouse (on specific settings) appears to behave correctly, with changes in speed being reflected faithfully in the cursor "immediately".

"Jitter" is, generally, randomness in exactly how much the mouse responds to your movements. Jitter is usually "noise".

"Acceleration" is a general change in the sensitivity of a mouse between two broad, different ranges of motion. "Positive acceleration" means the mouse's sensitivity is higher with fast motions, and "negative acceleration" means the mouse's sensitivity is lower with fast motions.

"Smoothing" is a mathematical and deterministic "blurring" of the sensor's motion or position data to remove high-frequency information like jitter or noise. All smoothing present in commercial mice takes the form of literal "blur" (TL note: "convolution"). Because you can't see the "future" of motion data without adding extra latency, this blur is biased towards past motion values, which means that it adds at least a small amount of latency.

File: FunC-MS-3-R2-Top.jpg (984KB, 4128x3096px) Image search: [Google]

984KB, 4128x3096px

func ms-3 dead company but no mouse has fit me so well

>>58484871
"Malfunction speed" is defined differently for different mice. Many modern gaming mice, when they malfunction, get locked into a state where they won't track until they stop moving entirely. Others, when they malfunction, just shoot off into a corner. Some sensors don't malfunction at all, or at least not that we know of, in which case you might as well use "malfunction speed" for any speed at which the sensor stops giving any sort of change in response for faster motion (as if a hard speed limit).

"Native DPI" is usually used to refer to a DPI setting that a mouse runs best at. While some sensors like the 3310 and 336X have no native DPI in this sense of the term, older mice could have lower tracking speeds or weird prediction when set to non-"native" DPI settings. The 3310 and 336X still have a kind of "native" DPI, where one pixel of cursor motion corresponds to one raster (or possibly half a raster, depending on how they work internally) of optical sensor image motion. The second definition is still useful because any subpixel resolution data (or possibly sub-half-pixel resolution, again) has to use non-trivial properties of the surface image. Such subpixel resolution data is always mandatory in a mouse sensor to reduce SRAV to reasonable levels, but at higher-than-"native"-dpi, the native deadzone of the sensor is shrunk below the "native" resolution of the mouse, so extremely slow movements are now subject to non-trivial surface properties.

"CPI", or more normally, "DPI", is the base sensitivity of a mouse, the number of pixels the cursor will move if you slowly move it an inch. Acceleration corresponds to a dynamic DPI. CPI is an alternative name for DPI used by people who think DPI is an inaccurate name, because mosue tracking doesn't have "dots" per se.

>>58484881
"Speed-Related Accuracy Variance", or SRAV, is an acceleration-like flaw where the sensitivity response of a mouse "ripples" up and down across a wide range of physical speeds. SRAV means that marginal changes in physical speed can cause noticable changes in. In fact, most "acceleration" that's part of a mouse is actually SRAV, under the surface. SRAV is one of the results of being unable to acquire perfect subpixel resolution data in the correlation process, as noted under the definition of "Native DPI". If perfect image resampling were possible (which it's not, for the sharpness of image that mouse sensors read off their surface), SRAV could be mostly eliminated by using overpowered DSPs inside sensors and supersampling the sensor images to an obscene resolution before doing correlation.

"Physical DPI", or some variation of the term, is used to describe either the physical scale of an optical sensor's rasters, or the optical field on the mousepad corresponding to said rasters. Both of them are meaningful and important in their own ways.

"Illustration snagging" is a behavior where some optical sensors don't track reliably when placed on top of certain graphical features of mousepads. This can happen for a large variety of reasons, including miscalibration or mis-aligned LEDs. Illustration snagging can manifest as literal snagging, as increased jitter on these areas, as a loss of tracking entirely, or as any other number of sensor flaws, including malfunction in the worst cases.

"Swamp cursor" is a subjective feeling that your movements under-respond, and when you compensate for the under-response, they over-respond. Swamp-cursor can be because of illustration snagging, smoothing, bad SRAV, etc. Because it's a subjective feeling, all bets are off when you talk about it.

I bought a MX master for my laptop but it's too big imho

For my desktop I still have a g9x, best mouse ever

>>58484885
SRAV means that marginal changes in physical speed, for the same physical distance, can cause noticable changes in cursor distance traveled*

>>58484885

"Framerate" is how often the mouse sensor polls the surface. Most gaming mice have a sensor framerate between 2k and 12k hz. Ideally, framerate would be in sync with polling rate, to eliminate tiny amounts of temporal jitter, but almost no mice do this. Mouse framerates add a small amount of latency to the tracking, but as long as they're reasonably high, this will be completely negligible.

>>58485012
"Polling rate" is how often the computer asks the mouse for updates. The faster this is, the less latency polling adds. 1000hz is considered transparent.

File: 1469403711887.jpg (124KB, 992x454px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 992x454px

>>58483316
I've been eyeing the MX Master for my MacBook since it looks pretty comfortable and supports Bluetooth, thus eliminating the need for those stupid fucking dongles.

Currently I have a Microsoft SideWinder X5 for my desktop and a classic Microsoft Wheel Mouse Optical for my MacBook.

File: 20170105_191041.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

>>58483316
Trackball of course
What are you? A gaymer?

File: logitech g600.jpg (145KB, 1500x1169px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1500x1169px

logitech g600
can't go back to having less buttons after using one

>>58486437
what do you use them for?

thoughts on the nixeus revel?

Currently using a Naga Hex V2

File: m60_viewb_lit_1_1.png (154KB, 800x719px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 800x719px

The heaviest mouse I can get my hands on. Currently using the Corsair M65 non RGB. Has little weights in it. One of the best mice I've used. I only use it for gaming and studio work though. Use a Logitech M570 wireless ball mouse for browsing.

What's a good, nice and decent ~$10 wired mouse?

>>58483316
Why use anything other than an expensive performance mx and a cheap outemu blue magic force keyboard?

SteelSeries Kana v2 it does the work and have had zero problems with it.

>>58483316
I really like mine as well, got it paired with my desktop and laptop.
For gaming I still have a G400s.

>>58484900
I was between the MX Anywhere 2 and the MX Master for my laptop and ended up going for the Master. No regrets, I got used to the size and it's more comfy.

>>58485261
It's quite good, I really like mine.

>>58483316
im shilling for free for the mx master. It's seriously the best lmao

>>58484873
func has known sensor problems. Mionix make a similar mouse with a 3310 (and it has adjustable lift off distance)

>>58486963
I liked the shape but the edges were too rough for me to use and it got too slippery. Its a perfect mouse for high sensitivity users.

I use a g600.

Just bought the Logitech G900. Enjoying it quite a bit.

File: C3Tech Themis.jpg (182KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 700x700px

>>58483316
I'm the only one using this one.
c3 tech/hades precision

File: x7.jpg (21KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x500px

A4tech X7. The nicest, the cheapest mouse.
It gets dirty easily, but it's also easy to clean it, so it's ok.

File: 1457445484253.jpg (20KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 640x480px

since this thread has a lot of mice/fps experts, which of the two is better: Zowie ZA12 OR Zowie EC1-A?

File: Elecom M-DT2DRBK.jpg (79KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 800x800px

trackball master race

>>58489297
depends on what you prefer. both are great and have good sensors. you should check out rocketjumpninja.com he has alot of good mouse reviews

File: grip.jpg (71KB, 689x626px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 689x626px

reminder

Been using this for about 5 years now. Performance Mouse MX. Has a button to toggle between free-rolling scrollwheel and clicky. Just spilled a shit ton of coffee on it by accident and it's still working after shaking out as much as I could.

File: performance-mouse-mx.png (58KB, 393x393px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 393x393px

>>58490149
Forgot pic.

>>58484031
G403 looks like the successor to the G400/s in my opinion

Recommend me a wired mouse that is ergonomic and cheap.

>>58483316
Is that you, other guy with an MX master? :D

>>58486983
games like league of legends and general shortcuts.

>>58486455

MOBA, MMO, tons of macros for programming.

>>58490426
meant to reply to
>>58486455

File: ea2b83f7ecf3c07b9570cb72.webm (366KB, 800x418px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 800x418px

Microsoft® Wireless Mobile Mouse 3500

File: IMG_20161225_155731.jpg (1MB, 2392x2256px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2392x2256px

>>58483316
This guy.
No lag.

>>58490608
>>>58483316 (OP)
>This guy.
>No lag.
Same and same. Very happy with it.

>>58483316
I've got a G502 at home and use my old G400 at work after I replaced its cable.

Use a deathadder for my desktop (its old as fuck now) and just got a MX Anywhere 2 for my new laptop.

>>58490381
Not op, but me too! It's the best mouse I've ever had. Love poppin that clutch.

File: secret_photo_08.png (136KB, 600x397px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 600x397px

this just came in the mail and I'm satisfied with it so far

>>58483995
I saw nothing wrong with the red light on the microsoft mouse. I'm sorry if you have literal autism.

>>58483316
i have the same mouse
its god tier and have a professional look
also im not a gayman

>>58490119
What is the mouse at the bottom? I want to fuck up my hand tendons.

>>58489893
What's the point of a wireless trackball mouse? It doesn't need to move.

File: 31X4aPcHwOL.jpg (10KB, 500x177px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 500x177px

Could someone please recommend me a mouse with similar shape?

File: 20160324185340_687_.jpg (37KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 800x800px

>>58483316
By far and wide, the g900 is the best mouse I've ever used.

For the record, I had this new "gamer" aeshtetic.

I've tried just about every mouse to date (entire logitech catalog, including the golden days with the g9 and g5), steelseries, corsair (m65 is honestly overrated), mionix, razer, and the dreaded rat mice.


By far and wide, the g900 has unbelievably smooth and accurate tracking. In lab tests, it beats out all the other contenders.


That being said, the damn thing is $150, so my personal recommendation is a g303, since the sensor in the thing is awesome and you can pick them up on sale for $30.

Desktop uses a g700 because it fits my hand nicely. Laptop has an m325, can't do better for 15 bucks.

>>58491984
I don't have a trackball, but the reason I use a wireless mouse is not because a cable gets in the way of normal usage, but because I sometimes move the mouse to a different position on the desk, or from the tray to my 'upper' desk.

>>58491984
Couch use? Don't need a flat surface, so it would make the perfect media PC input.

>>58494675
>In lab tests
what lab tests?

>>58483316
MX is nice but those wings are a fucking dealbreaker.

I want a mouse that:

1) Has an optical sensor
2) Wireless
3) 2 side buttons, 2 top buttons
4) Scroll wheel that's metal and spins freely
5) NO WINGS ON THE SIDE
6) NO FUCKING RUBBER ANYWHERE! Rubber degrades after a year or two and becomes sticky.
7) BONUS: Uses standard batteries.

Can /g/ recommend me a mouse that fits the above criteria?

>>58484031
I should have stockpiled these when I could have. Best mouse ever made, only flaw was the wire could have been a little sturdier.

>>58494912
G900 is the closest to that.
The DPI buttons are programmable, as well as the side scrolling clicks.

>>58494912
g403 prodigy but i dont know if it uses standard batteries

>>58494912
>>58494939
To add, the rear plastic cover feels like rubber on the sides, but is actually a hard, matte plastic.

>>58494675
>>58494951
>>58494939
fuck off samefag

>>58494959
>Only one person likes the G900
Ok poorfag.

>>58494939
>G900
If it weren't for the price, I'd pick it up. I just can't pay that much for a mouse. but yeah, it's the perfect mouse!

>>58494945
>g403 prodigy
no wireless tho.

File: g602-gaming-mouse.png (77KB, 521x342px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 521x342px

g602 reporting in
Have had it for a little over a year, really enjoying it but my finger can feel cramped from time to time. also a little on the heavy side but I love the button placement.
However the leftclick keeps "sticking" I believe they call it? So almost everytime I leftclick it double-clicks. Super annoying.

>>58494988
>no wireless tho.
there is wireless version you tard

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogzOpkM_ouo&feature=youtu.be

>>58494967
>wasting money
ok tardfag

>>58494988
>>g403 prodigy
>no wireless tho.
yes there is tho.

>>58494991
The G500 had the same double-clock problem.
I fixed mine by taking apart the switches, and bending the springs to make them more "clicky", sanding the switch contacts, and cleaning with Isopropyl on a Q-tip.

>>58494997
I liked the G900 so much that I didn't care that it cost as much as it did. There is no competitor that even comes close to it, and I don't regret it.
This is coming from a guy with an FX-8320, NZXT 210, and hadn't bought a new mouse in 4 years. I know how to buy on a budget.

>>58495025
still waiting for those "lab tests" that shows it blowing away all the competition

why does every mouse these days have to shove shitty gaymen aesthetic down my throat?

>>58495042
Yeah, that was internal Lab tests at logitech, but they showed some interesting data.
Luke (LTT) made a two videos, one where he went to the Logitech development offices, and one at an expo where they were demoing it.
Based on the setups that they had, I would believe the data that they showed though. It was the engineers talking, and not the PR guys, which is usually a sign that the info is valid.

>>58494997
>there is wireless version you tard
nice vid. but it has rubber sides :(

why, oh why, can't there be a good mouse without rubber?

none of the mice I've had could last past 2/3 years without rubber degrading or just ending up looking like it has leprosy.

>>58495083
Cheap mouses use cheap rubber.
Good quality rubber will last you for decades.
Similar to the difference between ABS and PBT keycaps. Both are plastic, but PBT doesn't wear down nearly as quickly as ABD and stays matte for years, whereas ABS can wear to a shine within months.

>>58495088
>Good quality rubber will last you for decades.
I have hard time believing that but OK.. I'd still prefer plastic over rubber.

This Logitech Pro looks perfect:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y52gOAzNSAU

Wish they had a wireless version of it. It has simple shape, not too large, no rubber, nice scroll wheel, just the right amount of buttons.

>>58495007
>I fixed mine by taking apart the switches, and bending the springs to make them more "clicky", sanding the switch contacts, and cleaning with Isopropyl on a Q-tip.
Anon I am not a skilled engineer such as yourself...

I use the MX Master for everything, but I sometimes I get jitter while playing vidya. Probably because everyone else in this apartment building has 2.4Ghz mice, keyboards, and wifis.

>>58495088
>Cheap mouses use cheap rubber.
>Good quality rubber will last you for decades.
Fuck off
Rubber is a shut material and shouldn't be used in mouses
Never buy a mouse with anything rubber

>>58483316
Love that mouse

File: Logitech-G100s-Optical-Gaming-Mouse-Review_1.jpg (82KB, 2048x1356px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 2048x1356px

G100S

Simple and classic. I don't play games with it, so its perfect. Only wish it didn't have all those dumb stripes all over it.

>>58483316

its a great mouse if the scroll wheel doesnt stop working as intended.

im on my fourth MX master and it broke just a week ago, i cba to go back and get a new one this time around...

File: 21wB+m5SVHL.jpg (7KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 300x300px

unironically.

been using the same for years, my hand is already used to it.

>>58486437
Just bought one myself, looking forward to my multi-button comfy

>>58488904
this and the natec genesis G55/V55 are truly the pinnacle of cheap shitty gaming mouse. Last forever and are better than any oem while being cheap.
I enjoy my sharkoon drakonia though, i know the sensor is smoothed but its a really good mouse compared to some recent shit they put out.

File: implying.jpg (28KB, 280x400px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 280x400px

>>58495066
>internal Lab tests at logitech
>engineers talking ... usually a sign that the info is valid

File: IMG_20170115_140742524.jpg (3MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3120x4160px

>>58483316
Love my MX Master!

The fucking mouse buttons on Logitech mice lose their spring because they use shitty thin plastic.

That crap never happens with an Intellimouse.

CM Storm Spawn/Xornet

>>58497443
only the original intellimouse. the reproductions are utter shit.

at least logitech arent built like a thai slut like the deathadders that start doubleclicking within a couple months and the scroll wears out and even the fucking paint falls off.

I'm using one of those cheap chink gaymer mouses with two lateral buttons and a DPI button and I have nothing bad to say about it. And it still works flawlessly after almost two years of heavy use.
I don't understand why people make such a fuss about brand mouses.

>>58498812
its not the brand, its about the sensor inside.

>>58498037
T.T I just want an Anywhere Mouse MX with robust buttons.

>>58499149
I go through 1 a year easy btw.

>>58499164
stop buying shit mice

>>58499179
Its the only small mouse with good tracking, there literally aren't any alternatives.

I'm probably going to go to staples and buy the new 2nd gen one today because the left click on my current one is worn out.

>>58499210
stop using a small mouse, babyhands

>>58499226
Double jointed thumb claw grip only works on small mice.

>>58499253
https://youtu.be/ogzOpkM_ouo?t=2m52s

>>58499286
Those mice are all too big for my grip style. I like to be able to move the mouse back without lifting my palm from the mousepad. You can kind of do it with a full sized mouse but with the Anywhere MX its way easier.

>>58499332
>those mice
its about the g403.
and you must have babyhands because the guy says i should work for claw

watch his other video where he compares a fuckton of mice

>>58483316

>try Logishit MX Master in store
>back and forward button are tiny and stacked atop of eachother

this shitty mouse can't be used for productivity

>>58499367
Dude full size mice are a non-starter, my palm shouldn't rest on the mouse while its touching the mousepad, I like the extra mobility. It isn't about having small hands, the full sized mice are too big his graph is retarded.

If I'd ever go wireless I'd get the MX Master, I really like how it looks and I had the MX1000 before.

I've also looked at the Logitech G Pro as a spiritual successor to Microsoft Intellimice, since the Microsoft WMO is the perfect mouse for me and I've used it for 10+ years.

Pic related, my two WMO's and IME3.0.

>>58499407
WATCH
THE
FUCKING
COMPARISON
VIDEO

>>58499433
Anywhere MX (The size I prefer) is literally like 30% smaller than the mice he is comparing.

I literally can not play RTS games with a full sized mouse after getting used to darkfield on a small mouse. It feels like trying to dribble a basketball with a bat.

File: performance-mouse-mx.png (90KB, 652x560px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 652x560px

MX performance because big mic are comfy and the MX master was too expensive

>>58499465
Also thinking some dipshit youtube reviewer can tell you which mouse fits your grip is fucking stupid, you have to go try the mice yourself.

File: collegedropout.jpg (52KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1280x720px

>>58499483
>There will never be an Anywhere Master MX

bought a rival 300 the other day
I've climbed 2000 mmr in dota 2
2.5k now
feelsgoodman

poo here

pls go to amazon.in and find me a good mouse under 1000 rupees

fucking sucks ;_____;

File: triggeredd.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

>>58499496
>dipshit youtube reviewer
leave this thread right now

>>58499541
I'm serious, it would be the same as watching a video of a guy trying on clothes to decide which style of Levi's you want.

There is no point, its for idiots.

zowie ec2a

>>58499601
that guy actually knows what he's talking about you fucking tard

>>58494880
See some of the testing done here:
http://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/2418-logitech-g900-chaos-spectrum-review-and-in-depth-analysis

This video is not specifically about the g900, but it comes out the king of all the mice tested, although, to be fair, the tests were run by logitec, but I can't imagine how they could botch the competition:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQxw-pX4dak

>>58499671
He's a namefag with tiny hands, why are you expecting rational behaviour from him?

>>58499523
>>58499523
>>58499523
>>58499523
>>58499523
>>58499523
>>58499523

>>58494924
They were great, especially considering the price. I heard some people had issues with their cord, but I liked how lightweight the cord was. The G400 got everything right and didn't include a bunch of extra gimmicks.

>>58499671
You act like talking about which size of mouse to use is a topic where any expertise could be gleaned from a godamn youtube video. I'm calling you the moron for watching it not him one for making the video, you were obviously the target audience.

>>58484031

I really hate the direction that logitech has taken with their peripheral, also I find it weird that the lower end mice don't even have back/forward buttons... why?

>>58499827
not only a namefag, but one with asian moonrunes

File: lvl1okhand.jpg (16KB, 209x230px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 209x230px

>>58499928
>too stupid to realize you can see the size differences in his video with the 40 difference fucking mice he tests

kys tripcunt

>>58500029
The fact that you believe watching 40 different youtube reviews of mice to see the sizes is in any way relevant to the situation just furthers my belief that you are a grade A moron.

File: stopposting.png (159KB, 519x480px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 519x480px

>>58500249
>watching 40 different youtube reviews
its one video, triptard

File: tard.jpg (71KB, 1024x512px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1024x512px

>>58500345
The video he linked was a review of one normal sized mouse.

All signs pointing to pic related, youtube fag status #rekt.

File: )when-someone-think-they-have-an-argument-but-its-not-2777133.png (54KB, 500x534px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x534px

>>58500425
>being this retarded
end yourself

>>58498812
Same here, got this thing off Amazon for like $5. Actually comfy as fuck and lights up.

>>58500535
>lights up.
Whoopdee shit

>>58497443
>>58499149
>>58499164
>>58499210
>>58499253
>>58499332
>>58499407
>>58499465
>>58499496
>>58499510
>>58499601
>>58499928
>>58500249
>>58500425
Tiny. Effeminate. Hands.

>>58500694
Considering I almost always leave my light off, it's helpful occasionally.

>>58500936
I guess, personally I'm just sick of "it lights up" being provided as a feature

>>58500535
but the sensor is still shit

>>58484873
mionix naos 7000 kind of resembles the shape of this one

I have the MX master,

the forward/back buttons need getting use to, not only are they small but the buttons themselves feel much further back than my previous mouse (another logitech)

Unless you have a need for that thumb button and the wheel there, you are likely better off getting something else for cheaper.

>>58483668
Why not just go with the 300? Same ergos, less dumb bullshit.
Unless you like said dumb bullshit...then hey, more power to you

>>58484658
>worse mouse
How so?
Same ergos, amazing sensor, similar weight, good build quality from the looks of it(I have the g403 and it has amazing build quality), etc...

>>58488904
Ya not bad honestly. It's a little like the deathadder in terms of feel

>>58492846
Razer Abyssus I think. Logitech g303 maybe?

File: g403-prodigy-wireless-gaming-mouse.png (36KB, 650x388px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 650x388px

>>58483316
The wireless G403. got it for $40 on craigslist. i like it.

File: g600-gaming-mouse-images.png (81KB, 521x342px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 521x342px

>>58486437
>>58486455
>>58490455

This.

Macros for programming and web browsing, its awesome.

>>58488904
Shit sensor ok feel

File: 1484232945736.jpg (6KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 300x168px

What's the best mouse WITHOUT ANY RUBBER on it?

Mice manufacturers love using rubber because it degrades quickly and you're forced to buy another mouse after a year. They just love jewing you out of your shekels.

Rubberized mice are also impossible to clean... as soon as you use dishsoap or lysol wipes, it becomes sticky and attracts even more lint and dead skin cells.

Seriously, fuck rubber on mice.

So, which mice don't have rubber?

File: 414BUQX+XSL.jpg (21KB, 500x400px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x400px

20 Years using these

>>58504979
[spoiler] fucking disgusting [spoiler]

>>58504906
G900

Also, you should use citrus cleaner instead of organic solvents to clean soft plastics/rubber.

>>58504906
just spring for a custom wood shelled mouse
https://www.amazon.com/Impecca-KBB500C-Bamboo-Handcrafted-Keyboard/dp/B003VOOOKY

>>58505255
hipster as fuck!

>>58505114
any cheaper options?

I got the g502 recently and holy shit the turbo mouse wheel makes it worth it just for browsing 4chan.

File: IMG_20161218_164604.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

Don't talk to me or my son ever again.

I use the compact mouse for osu, and the deathadder for everything else.

>>58485751
The fuck u on? Trackballs are gr8 for gaymun

>>58483316
How is it for gaming? I love everything about that mouse except for the fact that it's wireless. I don't do competitive gaming, however i do like to play FPS games where I maybe might notice some input lag.

I use a Deathadder Classic. Not the greatest mouse but I paid $30 for it and its pretty good for what I use it for.

I really want a Mionix mouse though. I just spent $700 on a new computer though so... maybe soon.

>>58506891
Haven't noticed any real lag myself but I barely game nowadays.
You can use it wired with the included micro usb I think.

Fits well in hand + Wireless + back/forward buttons on right side + scroll wheel
Optional: DPI button

That's all I ever look for in a mouse.

File: m500.jpg (178KB, 1477x1500px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1477x1500px

Logitech M500. My work got one for me when I said I wanted something more ergonomic. I liked it so much, that I bought my own. Great value for $25.

>>58507003
i like the shape and aluminum scroll wheel. too bad it's wired.

ps: does the wheel spin freely or does it have stops?

>>58503758
This, except I got the wired version. I also bought the DeathAdder Elite to compare with it. Ended up returning the DA Elite because the hump in the middle where your palm rests was too tall for my hand making me need to arch grasp/claw the mouse.

>>58507022

I prefer the wire since it's for a desktop and I don't use wireless for things that stay in one place.

You can choose if you want it to spin freely or click using the button under the wheel.

>>58507044
damn. looks almost perfect except for the wire.

does it have any rubber?

>>58507081

There's some grooved rubber on the scroll wheel for traction. Is that what you mean?

>>58507103
no, the sides. i hate rubber on the sides.

fuck, does Logitech make a mouse exactly like that but wireless???

File: m510.jpg (210KB, 1500x1145px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1500x1145px

>>58507114

The sides of it definitely feel like rubber, but it's smooth enough that it doesn't bug me. The closest I could find to a wireless equivilant would be the M510 (pic attached). It doesn't look like the same shape though, and looks smaller since it's probably marketed as a laptop mouse.

Also, if you hate rubber on the sides, then this looks like it would be annoying.

>>58507146
thats a shit mouse. rubber sides, shit scroll wheel.

>>58507164

Yeah, that scroll wheel does look like shit. Looks like it would stop immediately upon letting go if you try to quick-scroll

>>58507181
Yep! That "infinite scroll" wheel from logitech is the best. you can recognize them by the metal wheel. when they spin freely without clicks, it allows you to quickly scroll through pages. Wish more mice had that.

>>58507208

Even with the clicks, it still keeps some momentum if you flick it fast enough. Makes that satisfying high-pitched buzz too.