What the FUCK is their problem?

>$200+ billion company

What problem?

>>58483185
other manufacturers make garbage hardware so they feel the need to step up their game

ummm nothing?
their easily the best

>>58483185
no problem. do you have a problem mr poorfag?

>>58483232
reported to FBI fuckin pedo

>>58483286
>not buying overpriced iToys means i'm poor

>>58483319
>fictional little girls
>fictional
>real life pedo
How's special class treatin' ya?

>>58483371
>poorfags cant deal with the fact that they cant afford a superior product

File: exclusiveshit.png (17KB, 578x712px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 578x712px

>>58483391

>>58483232
source

>>58483185
Nothing, they make hands-down the best products on the market.

>>58483371
>good design
>good build quality
>best OS, mostly without /v/ toddlers
>computing classics
>"I can't save money"

>>58483391
>richfags cant deal with the fact that they bought a shitty expensive meme product

>>58483391
How is standard x86-hardware in an ugly thinmeme case superior?!

>>58483232
dude you're getting seriously fucking creepy

>>58483185
That they don't use this logo anymore

>>58483232
>bottomless
my nigga

>>58483232
Someone get her a clean pair of panties. She seems quite distraught.

>>58483413
>i7
>32 GB RAM
>1TB PCIe SSD
>6GB VRAM
>x86
Kill yourself

>>58483401
Shit for free is still shit

>>58483446
All standard parts, Apple hasn't been using POWER in over 10 years.

>>58483406
>one port
>thermal throttles
>shit file system, can't even merge folders
>nothing like based 90's apple
>"I like wasting money on fashion accesories"

>>58483232
suicide is recommended

>>58483480
Because the autists at IBM couldn't push PPC over the 2 GHz mark until 2005, except for the highest end 2004 model
That's why Apple and Motorola backed out of the deal and Apple proceeded to use intel.

8-bit guy made a great video on the PowerMac G5:
https://youtu.be/6SqYMU81l8Y

>>58483377
It's enough to put you on their watch list or arrest you on some countries

>>58483467
explains Linux

>>58483535
>>58483535
>>>58483406 (You)
>>one port
>using one product to refer to the whole company
>>thermal throttles
See previous answer
>>shit file system, can't even merge folders
It can, since Mavericks (10.9)
>>nothing like based 90's apple
You mean the horrendous Performa series?

>>58483185
They make products for hipsters, faggots and the lbgt community that pay $100 for organic socks.

>>58483592
Not in mine, so I don't give a shit

>>58483583
>Apple proceeded to use intel
What's the point then? You might as well buy any other cheaper hardware that's just the same.

>>58483634
winrar

>>58483634
I'm not a hipster, gay or eco-friendly in any way though

>>58483663
>>Apple proceeded to use intel
Becausw of less power consumption. Running a G5 for normal use 5 hours a day cost you $60 a year. It uses 355 Watts
>What's the point then? You might as well buy any other cheaper hardware that's just the same.
Everything ARM is meme shit.
Whose processors should they have gotten then?

>>58483734
Anything but fucking x86.

>>58483754
They don't use x86 at least since 10.8 though.
That's why the Mac pro 1,1 only got 10.7. They loaded a 32-bit EFI on there.

>>58483634
>being forward thinking, inclusive, and respectful for our environment is a bad thing
neo-/g/ everybody

>>58483855
>They don't use x86 at least since 10.8 though.
Really? What arch do they use now then?

>>58483956
SSE 4.2

>>58483978
That's an extension set for x86 dumbass.

>>58483185
They figured out how to milk off retards out of their money by releasing overpriced by the factor of 10x underperforming chink garbage in a tin frame, presented as a premium product in a circus grandeur by the team of self-absorbed hacks. The plebs thaw when they hear that they're being catered to and feel obliged to go with their annual ritual of disposing money on the newest iShit.

>>58483978
That's not how you spell AMD64

>>58483185
"The customer is never right"

>>58483185
Premium products for premium people.

>>58484133
Doesn't matter, same shit.

>>58484039
amd64 is also an extension set for x86, dumbass

>>58484118
>being this mad
(You)

>>58484218
See >>58484174

Their problem is that they don't have a good picture viewer in the OS or in the store.

Seriously, open a picture in Preview or whatever it is, and there are no controls to jump to the next or previous image in the folder

>>58484234
t. iPajeet

>>58484264
>needing GUI buttons
winfags everybody
unix is a lot more powerful than you would think

>>58484301
do you want a product for the masses or
a product for a select "elite"

>>58483185
They got another sugar water salesman as CEO.

>>58484271
t. Lintoddler

>>58484301
You misunderstood.

Spacebar won't take you forward, backspace won't take you back. There is no way to browse through images with the viewer.

>>58483978
I hope to god this is some shitty attempt at trolling and there aren't actually people on /g/ who are this technologically illiterate.

File: 1428082611518.gif (2MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x270px

>>58483185
They can't be successful without Steve Jobs

>>58484352
t. maccuck

Jonny Ive should've become the new CEO tbqh.

>>58484355
Yes, there is you brain damaged wintard. You select a group of pictures and navigate between them in the viewer using hot keys or the gallery on the left.

>>58484264
>Seriously, open a picture in Preview or whatever it is, and there are no controls to jump to the next or previous image in the folder

Because you only chose to open a single image. Why would an application open another file without you asking it to do so?

On the other hand, you could just use Quick Look to quickly cycle through the contents of a folder.

>>58484402
>mfw he makes crapple thinner financially every fiscal year
kek

>>58484415
>>58484427
The viewers in Windows and Linux don't have this problem, by the way.

Quick Look is pretty retarded too.

>>58483597
TOPKEK

>>58484374
t. Lintoddler

>>58484480
Windows and Linux should never be held up as examples of good design.

>>58484545
Indeed, so isn't it sad when they "just work" better than mac?

You'd think something like an image viewer would be a simple thing to get right, but no.

>>58484577
A good application follows the user's explicit requests. If you requested to open only a single image file, then the image viewer should show only that file and nothing else.

If you want to preview a bunch of files in a folder, then go to the Finder and use Quick Look. That's what it's there for.

It's a clear separation of functionality. An image viewer is not a filesystem browser.

>>58484645
>A good application follows the user's explicit requests
I can't explicitly request it to jump to the next file because that functionality doesn't exist

It does in Windows and Linux, by the way

It's almost as if the designers thought that if the user wants to view a picture, they might eventually want to view the next one too? And so they gave the user the controls to do just that without going back to the file manager

Quick Look is still retarded, the arrow keys move the selection around in the finder window (which is behind the preview anyway so not visible). I just wanted previous/next functions

Irfanview or ACDSee for mac when?

File: Screen Shot 2017-01-14 at 1.44.28 PM.jpg (54KB, 892x456px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 892x456px

>>58484780
>I can't explicitly request it to jump to the next file because that functionality doesn't exist

You can if you open that next file along with the current one.

You can even configure Preview so that any images you open later go into that same window.

...You do know you can open more than one file at the same time, don't you?

>>58484402
No.
Wozniak, but he likely just wants to sit in his rocking chair

>>58484780
http://xee.c3.cx/old

Too bad he changed the website design appearantly. Old one was basically a chan. Download Xee 2, it's super fast.

Preview is only for PDF

>>58483185
Pander to the cool-hipster-numale-starbucks-feminist audience, and expect that all the world is agree in everything they do. Basically selling more crap to their products.
And use cheap tactis like discussing with neckbeards or presume economic supeiority to trigger jaleousy or something like that.

>>58484894
If Wozniak were in charge, Apple would have collapsed under the mounting pressure of the DOS / Windows PC clone market during the late 80s and early 90s, just like Commodore and Atari and, later on, Be.

He knew how to make computers that his hobbyist buddies would like, not computers for the masses like Jobs wanted to make.

>>58484863
Sure I do

>go porn folder, select all, open preview
>takes a while to open
>quite slow to change picture
>wait, now it's working faster....
>stuck, beachballing
>a couple minutes later it works again
>can't set default to be zoom to fit

It's just not a good experience vs. Windows or Linux

>>58483232
>file deleted
wow rude
>>58483319
>>58483415
>>58483571
bullies

File: whos awesome.jpg (54KB, 500x590px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x590px

>>58484923
>http://xee.c3.cx/old

Now this I can get behind. I knew I could count on /g/ for a solution.

File: Chrome_Painter.jpg (85KB, 1152x864px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1152x864px

>>58483185
>What the FUCK is their problem?
FUTUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURE

>>58485036
You're now describing a performance issue, not a functionality or UI issue (except for the last part). Maybe it's HFS+ or maybe your Mac is just old and slow.

>>58485194
Well it is a mid-2010 mini so it is kinda old and slow.

But no matter, >>58484923 to the rescue