>He uses X11 instead of Wayland

>>58465560

X never broke for me

>t. arch user for 1½ year

>>58465573
>½
typical pretentious arch users

>>58465578

That doesn't change the fact X never broke.

>He uses XWayland and not pure Wayland.

>>58465573
X barely gets any huge updates anymore.

>>58466190
you almost made me reply "why fix what isn't broken" there, lad.

>>58465560
>implying wayland is an actual finished product and not a broken mess that still needs Xwayaland to run most applications anyways

>>58465560
But I do, I run it on KDE

>>58465560
X still needs to run on top of Wayland so that most applications could work.

>>58465573
You only started using Arch in mid-2015? You're literally still underage right now?

File: lmao.jpg (27KB, 500x309px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x309px

>he doesn't use Xenocara
>his windows server runs as root

File: blowitoutyourass.jpg (25KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x360px

more like gayland

>>58465560
And what do you use?

>>58468079
X11

>X
>tyool 2017
This is why nobody takes Linux seriously

File: fig1.big.jpg (562KB, 1013x766px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 1013x766px

Does wayland even support old window managers?

>tfw Quartz master race

>>58465560
majority of software doesnt support wayland faggot, go back sucking dicks

>>58465560

I have no reason to move away from X at all.