>Linux has bad font rendering Also reminder that infinality

fucking idiot

>>58463560
No one says Linux has bad font rendering.

>>58463560
Just use FreeDOS you dumb fuck. The fonts are very clear.

>>58463600
OP says it

>>58463560
that rendering looks like shit, anon.

File: yande.re 379408 sakurazawa_izumi.jpg (1MB, 2457x3547px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2457x3547px

>>58463747
an qt

>>58463560
No one ever says this, other way around window's font rendering is garbage haha

File: 2017-01-13-084903_1366x768_scrot.png (155KB, 1022x546px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1022x546px

taking the bait with no ragrets

>>58463918
nice rainbow rendering anon

>>58463923
It looks practically identical to greyscale on my monitor desu. You either have a different subpixel layout or wacky colour reproduction.

File: 2017-01-13-16:22:10-Gentoo Linux - Wikipedia - Nightly.png (447KB, 2560x1386px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 2560x1386px

seems okay to me; using sans 16 i think

Now it looks worse than when infinality worked

Font rendering on lunix and windows is dead tbqh

>>58463560
muh Ubuntu font rendering is way cleaner than my Windows 10, just saying.

Windows 10 fonts look like they're frail and sickly.

Is it just me or does font rendering always look worse on a white background.
Also why does font rendering in a tty look great but looks like total dogshit once you start X

File: tmp_16518-Screenshot_20170112-2339221159170934.png (279KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1440x2560px

>meanwhile on Android

File: 1469533579296.png (193KB, 1171x829px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1171x829px

>>58464257
Where is your god now?

Sent from my GNU/Linux machine

>>58464273
Thats borderline unreadable. Why is everything so blurry?

>>58464293
Time to get glasses, oldfag.

>>58464303
no he is right. Its like macOS with even wider characters. It looks awful.

>>58464317
I love wide characters

>>58463842
It really is. At least the one on 7

File: gentoo.png (1MB, 1908x5827px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1908x5827px

Sent from Windows 7

>>58464465
Hm, I'm probably autistic for noticing it, but the font rendering appears different if the screenshot is taken through firefox shell.
It's slightly brighter than it appears on screen.

Wonder why.

>>58463560
This looks very similar to the font rendering that Edge has, aka fucking garbage.

>>58463971
>You either have a different subpixel layout or wacky colour reproduction.
Or he might have a shit monitor with a really low PPI.

File: w2upsvhs.png (24KB, 1477x940px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 1477x940px

>>58463971
>>58464533
Nah, it's shite.

>>58464614
Yeah but you shouldn't be able to see that on your monitor. Either you've got a shit like 76 PPI monitor or your subpixel layout is non-standard because you didn't wanna spend above $50 on a monitor.

>>58464620
The shitty rainbow aliasing is designed for displays with DPI too low to properly render fonts.

Its a kludge for people that are too poor to upgrade.

File: w2upsvhs.png (21KB, 1530x980px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 1530x980px

>>58464620
Or maybe I don't have shit eyes.
Here's mine for comparison.

>>58464634
Reading somebody with a 1080p monitor shit talk subpixel font rendering to me is actually hilarious.
>>58464641
>Or maybe I don't have shit eyes.
You might. Take a picture of your screen instead of your monitor so we can judge.

>>58464656
>Take a picture of your screen instead of your monitor so we can judge
What a retarded sentence, whoops.
*take a picture of your screen instead of a sreenshot so we can judge

>>58464656
Cocky triggered ignorant little prick aren't you.