Rust so complex

Sucks to be retarded.

Based off your spelling and grammar, I can tell you don't try hard enough. Syntax matters.

>>58449531
I agree that it's really ugly. It really shouldn't have taken syntax ideas from C++.
It also has some complicated things to deal with, such as the ownership/lifetime system.
I think it's a neat language with some neat ideas though.

>>58449531
>Is it really worth it?
No, learn Common Lisp instead.

Learn Go, it's designed for for Java(Script) pajeets.

>>58449531
>Is it really worth it?
No, it's a system programming language, not for web dev.
Listen to >>58450725

Personally, I prefer COBOL, nothin personal, kid.

>>58450725
This. Go is retard-proof.

>>58449531
>go is lazy
What ? Haskell is lazy, not Go.

>>58450895
i am not focused on web dev. Just want to get better in programming. So i am on the hunt for a language which will teach me the good and safe way of doing so.

Not interested in punching stuff together. I can already do that in javascript or golang. I want to learn to be a better programmer. Hence why i learned clojure. Everybody told me Lisp is a nice way to get a different look at things. But then i wanted something with type-safety or compiled bin-files.

>>58449531
Rust isn't complicated. Afaik, the only "special" features are the borrow checker and memory safety. The borrow checker is relatively simple. The module system is a pain in the ass. I like C++ more desu.

>>58451357
Learning new langs won't necessarily a better programmer. Tackling new problems will.