Is this the buggiest website in existance?

>>58446515
If you're using a shit browser yes, probably

dude just use mailbox.org why are you succumbing to the microsoft botnet

>>58446515

I use it at work in a office of mostly women. They dont seem to have many issues.

>>58446529
>posted at :22:58
>>58446530
>posted at :22:57
holy shit we got some time travelers here?

File: 1366225356905.gif (2MB, 312x196px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 312x196px

>>58446536

>time travel shit posting

>>58446529
>mailbox.org
That's complete shit. I'd rather stay with Outlook.

I dont have any problems, but it does seems a little sluggish for what it is. I dont get why it needs a full on loading screen

Dell.com

>>58446515
works for me. I use outlook for jobs search shit. though i still prefer a desktop mail client to pull in all my accounts vs meme web clients with their "loading" screens/bars.

>>58446515
no.

>>58447291
>I dont get why it needs a full on loading screen
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html

The first place goes to every damn big company's recruitment website.

>>58448913
I use outlook for jobs search shit.
Nice, I do that too. I use a clean [email protected] because I felt that having numbers in your mail address would be a recruiters repellent. I abhor everything about the outlook webmail interface tho.

>>58446515
I don't know about buggy, but it's a really fucking resource intensive piece of shit.

>>58446515
Could be. Every "web app" made by MS is buggy as fuck.
And their websites in general are shit.

I'm guessing it's because they're all made for IE first, or something. And so when you use a proper browser they shit the bed.
But then the W10 Store is also buggy as fuck. I just don't know anymore. How is this company not bankrupt yet.

>>58446536
This happened to me once, it has something to do with the size of their posts and how Yotsuba stores/handles them.