square monitor thread lmao all you rectangle monitor mother

I'm using a CRT monitor, you faggot.

File: 1472916425944.png (168KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 340x340px

>>58445537
Who 4:3 (or as I like to call them, 12:9) master race here? They're still the best!

File: a.png (212KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1280x1024px

>>58445521
>Using a 5:4 monitor image on a square monitor thread

>have dual monitors with 4:3 next to 16:9
great setup desu

File: bs4.jpg (565KB, 1920x1275px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 1920x1275px

Can't wait to get rid of mine

>>58445521
squares are rectangles, you dingus

>>58445590
theme?

File: noEarthquakes.jpg (135KB, 654x872px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 654x872px

Great for rainmeters, taskbars, music players and cluttery icons to leave your bigger one clean.

>>58446095
Jealous of this setup anon

>>58445574
That's 5:4 you retard.

>>58446044
Kill yourself, you dumb fucking shit stain.

I used to run three Dell 4:5 1280x1024 monitors, and they were great. But later I upgraded to two Dell 1920x1200.

I'm happy, the widescreen is nicer. I do kinda miss having a square webpage. even in 2017, 907% of websites are still designed for 4:3 in mind.

File: 1467522491298.jpg (20KB, 720x453px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 720x453px

>>58445929
>all that gaymer shit
I hope you're under 18 and are breaking 4chan rules. if not, see pic.

>>58446291
Edgy

>>58446067
http://neiio.deviantart.com/art/Soft8-1-380281415
and Aero glass

File: 1455639511554.gif (858KB, 240x228px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 240x228px

>>58446299
you could def use an edge on those manchild wrists of yours.

>not 8:5 golden ratio

I had a 1920x1080 and a 1280x1024 monitor for many years, just recently tossed it out when i replaced them both with two 2560x1440p IPS panels.

Really dont care about the lack of squareness since I now have 5120x1440p of desktop space to work with.

I have 5 Planar 1280x1024 monitors, and 6 Dell business monitors (same size) that have been around for a while, it's...refreshing.

The pixel density also shows how things were in the past

16:10 tho

I think monitors should be 2:3 desu.

t. painter

>nobody in the thread actually has a square monitor

Why not 2:1?

>mfw no 4000x2000 dual monitors for ultimate productivity

>>58446721
this. 16:10 is superior to anything on the market

>>58447831
See
>>58447793

>>58446146
He's right though........

>>58447793
2:1 is almost the same as 16:9 but it provides even less vertical space (would be 16:8).

>>58445929
wow. that setup is... gay

>tfw no oval monitors

>tfw bought a CRT just to get high refresh rate
I cant believe they were this good
>great color
>true blacks
>effectively zero displaylag
>any res looks like native res (no skipped pixels)
>160 Hz for under 20€

>>58445521

> ctrl + f trapezoid
> not rocking trapezoid monitors with non linear pixel size

just kys all of (you)

>>58446095
Will it blow out your eardrums when you turn the volume up all the way?

I had my second monitor in portrait for a while, but then I rolled it to landscape to splitscreen games with the bf and watch movies and haven't put it back even though it's on a nice stand that makes it effortless because I found it to be more useful in landscape. It's now my default monitor for everything but games (because only 60Hz) since it's PWM-free. I wasn't even using the top half most of the time with it in portrait because it was uncomfortable to look up that high.

>>58449025
Eardrum rupture is very rare. Most traumatic hearing loss is just damage to the inner ear's hair cells.

>>58446095
For a split second I thought the books were holding the shelf