Post: >monitor model >what you see in the red square

>>58439249

Fuck you.

BenQ GL2450

some kind of a pale rounded square, with the letter O in its centre and a little red dot near the upper right corner

>>58439249
>monitor model
Asus VW193S
>what you see in the red square
The logo of the best social network ever

>>58439249
Samsung UE40ES5500 (television)
And i see a, well... red square

>>58439249
Don't know the model, I see the instagram logo.
My monitor is in my laptop which is a Lenovo Y50-70 UHD. Its [email protected] IPS

>insta-logo.png
gee i wonder

I have a manually calibrated shitty AOC 1080p.

t. poorfag artist

>>58439265
>>58439268
>>58439271
>>58439284
All trolling, there is just a red square... right?

I see it just fine on this old Sharp Aquos tv.

OP here. Thumbnail gave it away. I guess it was too much to hope the 4chin thumbnail generator would be color space aware

>>58439249

>SONY Trinitron
>All I see is OP's swollen asshole.

File: gamma-test-2.png (40KB, 990x768px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 990x768px

>>58439302

Check your gamma level.

File: glyph-logo_May2016_200.png (7KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 200x200px

>>58439302
No its this but in similar shades of red. I'm guessing this is an sRGB test.

File: Screenshot_2017-01-11-20-00-31.png (60KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 720x1280px

>>58439302
iphone test image, wider RGB range.

Tip: they say it works on some androids(mine is a z3c and it works), not because we also have that wide RGB, but <damage control>

>>58439302
I swear I can see it. Barely, but I can.

Can see he logo crystal clear on my iPhone :)

>>58439329
>>58439308
>>58439313
>>58439249
>>58439265
>>58439268
>>58439271
>>58439284
>>58439285
>>58439298
>>58439300
>>58439302
>>58439308

explanation: https://engineering.instagram.com/bringing-wide-color-to-instagram-5a5481802d7d?gi=c7180c9c2644

>>58439316
I looked at the image with gamma levels ranging from -3 to 3 and still didnt see anything

Some shitty Samsung laptop
an Instagram logo but only on the thumbnail

>>58439249

AHHH MY EYES!!!

>>58439360
You don't have a big enough colorspace.

File: IMG_7080.jpg (971KB, 1728x1296px) Image search: [Google]

971KB, 1728x1296px

OLED STRONK

File: DSC_0022.jpg (106KB, 800x1066px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 800x1066px

$100 LCD from like 5 years ago reporting.
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824160047
Do I win something?

I have to see the image at a ~70 degree angle (where 0 is right in front of the monitor), but then I can clearly see the square with rounded corner, the circle inside and the dot in the corner.

This shit gave me a migraine btw

>>58439470
That just means your monitor isn't adjusted well.

>>58439249
Why does it have a bunch of jpeg artifacts when it's a PNG?

>>58439249
27" crossover IPS
can see it easily

>>58439249
>ThinkVision LT2452P
>The logo of one of the most cancerous social networks in the world

>>58439470

>I have to see the image at 70º

You need to fix your gamma.

>>58439593
why?

>>58439627
Because it's displaying the correct color space, yet you can't see it.

>>58439645
It is easier to see on my other screen, but I don't really stare at bright images with little variance in them.
If I watch a movie, it is fine, if I stare at text, it is fine.

File: Screenshot_20170111-142730.png (180KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1440x2560px

>>58439331
Works on Moto X Pure

>>58439249
Why does it appear in the thumbnail but not in my browser? Is 4chan doing something fucky with the colours?

>>58439707
Too lazy to even look at the thread?

in my shitty 3d tv but on my moto g 2nd gen it's a camera-like logo. I knew my phone screen was way better.

>>58439759
"in my shitty 3d tv it was just a red square" is what I meant of course

File: What fuckery is this.png (138KB, 1726x1058px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1726x1058px

I don't understand what's going on...
Fucking colourspaces, how do they work?

>>58439249
works on my nexus 6p

>>58439249
I cn see the square (instagram logo?) in the thumbnail, but not in the fullsized image

>>58439739
No - I mean if my monitor can't display the original, what has 4chan done to it so that I can see it in the thumbnail? Surely the thumb should have the same colours.

>>58439803
Ditto, I saw nothing in the full sized image, so I copied it to gimp, which says there is exactly one color. What the fuck.

>>58439832
>>58439871
>>58439882
>>58439249

What magic fuckery is this shit

i can see the details both in thumbnail and full size.
windows 10 and edge just werks.

>>58439871
not necessarily, I'm not entirely sure but I think the thumbnail can end up changed by some scaling algorithm or even be a completely different image if you know your metadata

File: file.png (88KB, 935x670px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 935x670px

Instagram logo when looking at thumbnail
Nothing but red after opening it

>>58439249
on firefox i see the instagram image, on chrome its just red.

On my shitty CRT over VGA: A red square.

On my shitty Acer flatscreen over HDMI converted to DVI: A washing machine.

File: pantone_2013_dot_color.png (456KB, 1168x1400px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 1168x1400px

>>58439803
>>58439871

The image is using the DCI-P3 colorspace. Both reds are outside the sRGB colorspace, so they appear as maximum red when converted to it. If you can see the logo that means either:
1) your monitor can display more than sRGB and is properly calibrated to work with expanded colorspaces, or
2) more likely, your system is retarded or miscalibrated, doesn't understand colorspaces properly, and is displaying the pixels directly in your device's colorspace.

>>58439997
same desu

>>58439803
>>58439832
>>58439871
>>58439882
>>58439928
A little more experimenting and I've found that saving the file, then opening in gimp causes it to display correctly.

So, for whatever reason, it seems the browser is fucking up the colors somehow, and copying the image from there into another program keeps the faulty information.

>>58439249
Toshiba Satellite L755 laptop, Instagram logo on thumbnail but red when opened

File: redimage.png (42KB, 451x901px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 451x901px

lmao, on a side note anyone knows of a good software for wangblows to check my monitor's color gamut/range

>>58440000
>2) more likely, your system is retarded or miscalibrated, doesn't understand colorspaces properly, and is displaying the pixels directly in your device's colorspace.
Isn't that a more appropriate way of handle the lack of monitor support, rather than just showing a read square?

>>58440050
You need a colorimeter for that

>>58440069
Why can't a monitor/mobo/gpu measure that?
Shouldn't the technical limitations that are built in be easily read for example by trying to display a colour and seeing if it appears?

>>58440069
Or have trained eyes.

t. calibrated my monitor manually

>>58440000
Is there a way I can check what colour sapce it's using? FFmpeg says it's rgb24 - Can that represent DCI-P3, or is this wrong and it's the same as sRGB?

>>58440084
Displays degrade with use, and there are quality variations in all of them.

>>58440000
Why do we see a shitload of green?

Asus VG248QE. I see the logo.

>>58439249
Nexus 4.
The Instagram logo (I think).
(Round square with circle inside and top right another circle).

>>58440129
Half of that is blue

File: 1433974167296.jpg (35KB, 548x417px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 548x417px

>>58440129
plants?

>>58440098
>rgb24

That just means it's using 8 bits for each of red, green and blue. Basically that means you have 256 levels for each color, while the colorspace is what decides how red, green and blue 100% is for each of those.

>>58440129
because evolution

>>58439249
I can see it clearly. OnePlus 3

>>58439249

Dell P2416D
Instagram logo

>>58440178
Ah, right, I get you.

And so Paint.net and FFmpeg are just assuming (wrongly) that it's sRGB when opening the file? But chrome is rendering it "correctly" but oversaturating it because I don't have P3 support in my monitor?

>>58440032
Further info, there's some interesting XMP data in the file:
<code>
Profile Name : Photoshop ICC profile
[...]
Primary Platform : Apple Computer Inc.
[...]
Red Tone Reproduction Curve : (Binary data 32 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Chromatic Adaptation : 1.04788 0.02292 -0.0502 0.02959 0.99048 -0.01706 -0.00923 0.01508 0.75168
Blue Tone Reproduction Curve : (Binary data 32 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Green Tone Reproduction Curve : (Binary data 32 bytes, use -b option to extract)

[...]
Profile ID : e5bb0e9867bd46cd4bbe446ebd1b7598
Profile Description : Display P3
Profile Copyright : Copyright Apple Inc., 2015
[...]
Creator Tool : Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
</code>

>>58440284
I guess GIMP and FFmpeg must be ignoring that data and assuming it's sRGB, then?

File: Screenshot_2017-01-11-21-13-47-401_org.floens.chan.png (102KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1080x1920px

Is this the blue black dress thing again?

I can see it clearly on my Redmi 4 Pro.

>>58440365
Surely if that were screenshotting correctly I wouldn't be able to see the icon, but I can.

So there's something wrong with A: Your screenshot program or B: Your browser.

>>58439249
Asus MG278Q
An icon when thumbnailed, nothing when expanded (probably fucking with PNG double-images)

When I look at the the thumbnail I see an Instagram logo but when I hover over it I just see a red square.

>>58440032
when you say
>copying the image from there
what do you mean? maybe whatever is you're doing is using some screenshot feature external to the browser

>>58440405
Or it's converting the colorspace when it's taking the screenshot.

>>58440564
I expanded the image, then right clicked and chose copy image, and pasted it into gimp.

>>58440606
Which is a problem with the screenshot program - If the image is displayed in P-3, it should be screenshotted in P-3, otherwise you're losing information.

>>58440608
this seems like a interesting problem, I hope someone knows why

>>58440656
maybe something to do with the graphics driver

>>58440608
Try saving the image, then opening it with gimp.

Asus VS239 clearly see IG logo on thumbnail, red square when i open it

>>58440129
because it penetrates deeper into water than red. the eye evolved from aquatic lifeforms.

>>58440678
I did, and it displayed differently as mentioned on the first line here: >>58440564

>>58440678
>>58440767

Shit, copied the wrong link, I meant here: >>58440032

File: image.png (81KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 750x1334px

iPhone 6s

>>58440815
>Safari

How can you use this shit?

>>58440834
(not him) on iphone and macbooks it isn't shit?

OnePlus 2. Looks like the Instagram logo.

File: Xayqs3IS.jpg (321KB, 1971x1971px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 1971x1971px

>>58440178
>>58440762
>evolution

>>58439331
Werks on galaxy s5

>>58439249
I'm on firefox on linux and I can see it on both my shit monitor and my korean IPS monitor.

>>58439249
Dell P2715Q
AMD HD7770 (radeon driver)
Instagram Logo.

Dell M49GV E170SC 17" Flat Panel LCD Monitor VGA
Nothing
>>58439249

>>58439249
thinkpad L450
instagram logo but red.

Instagram logo.

lg25um58 - bretty shitty IPS screen

>>58441896
>shitty
It's the same panel used in equivalent Dell monitors.
LG panels are typically very good.

>>58439249
A red square.
Playstation 3 Monitor

>>58439331
Works on Nextbit Robin.

>>58439249
Dell U2414H

The instagram logo. A rounded square, a large dot in the upper right corner inside the rounded square, finally a circle in the middle of it all. Paler red on darker red.

>>58440815

Iphone 5 with chrome - can't see shit

File: 1482149841364.jpg (148KB, 358x505px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 358x505px

>>58439249
The instagram logo seem to be wriggling for me.
is this happening to anybody else?

>>58439249
>hp 25xw
A severely artifacted instagram logo

>>58439249
Nexus 6
Instagram

>>58439316
I've heard this doesn't work on chrome. I can see the logo on firefox

>>58440086
>""""""calibrated""""""

>>58439249
>monitor model
Some shitty Envision LCD monitor from 2006 or 2007 that was about $100 new. I've noticed a significant difference in the amount of colors you can tell apart in a picture vs a monitor from the later 2000s but still have been too lazy to replace it.

>what you see in the red square
Slightly rounded square with a circle inside of it and a dot by the upper right hand corner. What exactly is this supposed to prove? Are devices now days actually worse than my old ass monitor?

>>58439249
I can see it on my LG 23" TV Monitor
But not on my 24" BenQ GL2450

Mind you...On the LG, just the thumbnail. Not the full image.

And it's the Instagram logo.

>>58440405
Idk mane whenever I screenshot something it looks fine on my phone but when I upload it some of the colors are a a bit off

>>58439268
>some kind of a pale rounded square, with the letter O in its centre and a little red dot near the upper right corner
this and a 10 y.o. Samsung SyncMaster 226BW

>>58439268
Asus PG278Q, same thing. Looks like the Instagram logo.

File: Untitled.png (493KB, 2557x1151px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 2557x1151px

>>58439249
tl;dr
FireFox = MasterRace
Chromium = shit

>>58439249
red instagram logo

>>58439268
this, dell 2515h

Shows on both my fuckold Philips 192EL and the Redmi Note 3 Pro

File: 01c74acd410d93b4a8ff64df6d809643.jpg (21KB, 400x398px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x398px

>>58439249
oh shit

on my hp2475w IPS with 15% brightness I clearly see instagram logo

on my old eizo TN panel I see red square and nothing else

also red is different

File: 2017-01-11 17_59_54-(70) _g_ - Post_ __ _monitor model __ _what you see in the red square - Aurora.png (259KB, 3012x1053px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 3012x1053px

>>58442717
Chrome left, Aurora right. Dunno wut you mean, m80.

>>58439249
>Acer H236HL bid
>saw the logo after adjusting the contrast

File: Screenshot.png (16KB, 801x405px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 801x405px

>>58439249
Instagram logo?

>monitor model
Picrelated, cheap chink shit with a fucked up color palette/contrast ratio.

File: DSC_9619.jpg (406KB, 1798x1200px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 1798x1200px

>>58439249
HARD MODE: Do the same on your TV

Monitor: HP 25xw
TV: Samsung KU6300

Looks perfectly fine on both (much better than I could capture in the photo).

>>58439249
CBA to look up the exact model number but the latest IPS replacement for X220
I see a ridiculously jpg compressed instagram icon

File: 1474403096773.jpg (66KB, 636x627px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 636x627px

>>58439249

Instagram logo with the circle and the dot.

Samsung S27C750P

But what you have to understand that near every monitor out there is capable of displaying this. Some morons have their contrast or red channel way too high which can choke it, but that's not indicative of the capabilities of the monitor itself.

You did give /g/ an excuse to post about themselves though, even in a completely irrelevant capacity. We get to say which monitor we bought and feel like a part of something. So good job, I salute you. You are contributing to the community.

If you can see the instagram logo in thumbnail, but not when you open it, your monitor is good.

If you can see anything but red in the full image, you have a shitty monitor/display.

>>58443058
xD

>>58443067
t. $100 IPS display from 2011

>>58439249
>Dell U2515H
IG logo both in thumbnail and when opened.

>>58439249
>monitor model
Phillips 231E
>what you see in the red square
Instagram logo. You'd better not put it inside the name though.

>Profile: Display P3
>he does not know how shit default colour management of browsers is
>he does not know that Chrome does not support it at all

File: chromeistrash.jpg (159KB, 1756x920px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1756x920px

left = chrome
right = firefox

File: IMG_8039.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

> tfw using a p3 display on my 2014 Retina Macbook
feels good desu, old Samshit display got a dead pixel, Apple replaced it under warranty, now I have a LG P3 display.

>>58443139
>he does not know how shit default colour management of browsers is
>he does not know that Chrome does not support it at all

This. Another embarrassing /g/ thread.

Even if OP's reposting worked, people with wide gamut monitors still run them in sRGB emulation for desktop purposes, rendering the whole test pointless.

File: Capture.png (92KB, 1905x899px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1905x899px

>>58443183
picrelated = Photoshop CS5, a ahighly regarded tool of the industry

>>58443210

You morons are completely misunderstanding what's going on here.

>>58443078
It means the program you're using fails to read the sRGB tag. Look here: >>58442717
Use wand and you'll see that Chrome actually displays the same colour, not the monitor. You're supposed to see the instagram logo in that picture.

>>58439249

>2015 rMBP
All red in Chrome, Safari, and in Preview
Instagram shows up in Firefox

>LG G4
Instagram logo shows up everywhere

>>58443283
>>58443210
So Chrome is shit?

>>58443254

I am not, I am misunderstanding how two correctly setup programs output largely different image tagged with profile which has almost the same red primary as my monitor.

>>58439268
dell xps 13 i see it too

>>58443323

Yes. Firefox is shit too (in a different way): they didn't manage to make a Vsync yet: http://www.vsynctester.com/firefoxisbroken.html

>>58443350
What is a good non-reddit browser? By reddit I mean Chrome, Firefox, Safari etc.

>>58439249
I see the Instagram logo in full red, I have the Thinkpad T400 TN panel, 1280x800

>>58443323
Also: http://cameratico.com/guides/firefox-color-management/
>>58443369
Idk, I use Firefox.

>>58439249
Acer AL2216W
I see the full logo

>>58443305
>All red in Chrome, Safari, and in Preview
>Instagram shows up in Firefox
Go the display settings -> Colors and select the P3 profile.

Instagram logo my note 5 screen with vastly superior oleds

>>58443350
That site seems broken to me, indicates that FireFox renders that at 30fps (which it does) but FireFox's scroll on page for instance is done at 60fps. Also agar.io runs at 60fps which would indicate that VSync works fine.

>>58441376
Werks on my shitty s2

t. Poorfag

>>58439331
Works on my Asus Zenfone

>>58443587
Still shows up red in chromium but shows up fine everywhere else now

>>58443811
>Also agar.io runs at 60fps which would indicate that VSync works fine.

Did you read the whole article?

>>58439331
Works fine on 6p. Crisp clear

>>58442426
I'm sorry you don't have a sharp eye like mine.

I can even sense the effect ambient light from outside the window having an effect on my monitor's color, depending on different times of the day.

I have to manually re-calibrate my my monitor every 4 hour.

>>58443811
ufotest runs fine in firefox even above 60hz.

File: 1461243965125.jpg (441KB, 620x800px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 620x800px

>>58444365
applied autism; the post

File: 1480274791623.jpg (87KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 900x900px

>>58439249
lg g3 w/ clover & it's clear as a bell

>>58444424
if i find that image funny do i have serious autism

>>58439249
Using galaxy s5 right now (inb4 phoneposter)
It's the Instagram icon

File: Binky_s9_better.png (482KB, 610x629px) Image search: [Google]

482KB, 610x629px

>>58444513
no, the pic was unrelated. you should embrace your inner 'sperg tho anon ~_^

>>58439249
>insta_logo-png
Dell XPS 13 with QHD Sharp panel I see the Instagram logo

File: pie.png (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

pic related. i see a redish instagram icon.

>>58439249
On SJWFox I can see the instagram logo, but on IE11 (Win8.1) it's just a flat red image.
really gets those synapses firing

>>58439268
I have a Dell st2220l (or something like that)
I see the 2 rings, one outer rounded square, an inner circle, and a dot to the upper right of the circle. I only see this in the thumbnail tho, when enlarged it goes away.

>>58439249
ASUS VX228H
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236358
Haven't touched settings so all the mode settings are stock
Can see instagram perfectly in Theater mode but only faintly in other modes

Samsung 225BW

Rounded square with a circle and dot as already noted, faint but it's there.