What does /g/ think of AdNauseam?

is that site design supposed to be ironic?

>>58434640
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>last name is Zer-Aviv
>clicks ads on websites(making the site owner money)
confirmed jew trick

Looks shady as fuck by the design of the website.

>>58434640
>.io
into the recycle bin it goes

>banned by google

installed

How can I trust that?

>>58434831
it's FOSS, you can read the code yourself

>>58434771
this
fuck google

I feel that the more we fight against ad networks, the stronger they're going to get.

>>58434863
>the more we fight against X, the stronger they're going to get
might aswell kill yourself, but it might make you stronger

>>58434863
They're not fucking Saiyans we're dealing with you moron

>>58434892
might as well fight against Trump voters; say that they're racist, sexist, fascist and homophobic. It should surely kill his chances to become president!

>>58434892
No, it's that as more people are blocking this shit going into certain places on internet is much worse. You have ads in fucking Windows 10 now without even opening a browser. You use sites that track everything about you, social networks specially and they still are fairly aggressive about putting ads on your shit too. They've been trying really hard for normal sites, and I still remember my shitty teenage years not getting much of that (or at least as intrusive) unless I entered scam sites. And I didn't know ad blocking was going to be a thing either. All I fucking needed was firefox.

You want to shit really fucking hard on the livelihood of some, even if it's advertising, they're bringing their shit in such way that you can't fucking ignore them through blockers. When you fuck with someone's money you're begging to be fucked back.

I'm using it

>>58434935

>fighting
>the same as lying

>>58434640
Is this a risk in case of malware infested ads ?

>>58436877
No

How does AdNauseam "click Ads"?

AdNauseam 'clicks' Ads by issuing an HTTP request to the URL to which they lead. In current versions the is done via an XMLHttpRequest (or AJAX request) issued in a background process. This lightweight request signals a 'click' on the server responsible for the Ad, but does so without opening any additional windows or pages on your computer. Further it allows AdNauseam to safely receive and discard the resulting response data, rather than executing it in the browser, thus preventing a range of potential security problems (rogue Javascript or Flash code, XSS-attacks, etc.) caused by malfunctioning or malicious Ads. AdNauseam's clicking behaviour can be de-/activated in the settings panel.

>>58434640
Not touching that shit.

>>58434771
>https://adnauseam.io/
>We’ve since learned that Google now also disallows users from manually installing and updating AdNauseam, thus locking users out of their own saved data, all with no prior notice or warning.
don't be evil guise

>>58434640
I wanted to make something like this already,

nice.

>>58434640
I am very intrigued. I don't want to fuck over ad companies or anything. I just want to let me favorite websites get their revenue without hurting my browsing experience (and protect myself from malware).

Is this safe?

>>58437032
appwise? yes. If they actually get the money? No clue

>>58434863
and the more they fight back the stronger adbocks get, it goes both ways

>>58434863
Didn't know Canada's prime minister browsed /g/.

>>58437109
fag

File: winner.png (218KB, 556x397px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 556x397px

>>58437117

I assume you only visit websites you like. With this you can get then banned from advertisers. Then nobody will advertise on 4chan anymore.

>>58437154
good. the ads on 4chan are invasive and botnet

>>58437161
Without funding 4chan will go down.

>>58437172
I hope so

>>58437172
good, we'll finally be free

Can i make it so it won't click on some sites?

>>58436897
thanks, makes sense

File: 1438994220052.png (656KB, 1300x864px) Image search: [Google]

656KB, 1300x864px

That's kinda similar to what I've been doing for years.
Whenever I find some right winger's blog I always click on all their ads hundreds of times every day (I use my spare computer with Axife Mouse Recorder running for hours) until their network bans them for "cheating".
I do this for every network they use, until they have to resort to donations or straight away close the website and have to find a real job LMAO.
I call it active-activism, since regular activism is basically just trying to convince people of something, while this is actually making a difference in the world, as there are now hundreds of hate-spewing blogs less, ruining the future generations.

File: 1484041793032.jpg (24KB, 292x302px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 292x302px

>>58437347

I don't know if this is as good as uBlock Origin, so I won't use it. I like the idea and hope it will get big.

>>58437172
Good then we'll just migrate to the next site. That's the great thing about capitalism, if a company can't make money and dies, an alternative will spring up to seize the market.

>>58434640
>>58434640
I had this question: "Isn't it safer just to use an adblocker? Why engage with ad-networks at all?"
And found the answer in their FAQ section:

>Indeed it is marginally safer for one to simply use a strong adblocker and protect themselves.
>But this is not for everyone. If your goal is primarily self-protection, it may not be for you...

They use trailing periods all throughout their literature. Could they be anymore dramatic? Makes me think they're a little retarded.

>>58434640
Will definitely install for Firefox. Fuck ad companies, time to teach them a lesson.

>>58437127
Can Canadians do anything right?

>>58437347
How can the right-wing be the problem when the left-wing was in charge for a decade?

>>58437347
this is a wonderful idea, thank you

>>58437347
You my friend are an evil genius.

>>58438144
Because if the right had been in charge it would be way worse.
Anyway, it's not about right wing politicians, but about the right wing mentality of hate that propagates even when their politicians aren't in office.
All I'm doing is to prevent (even if just a little) that sort of toxic mentality to spread among people, and therefore creating a slightly better, more peaceful, tolerant and inclusive world where everyone can be free to live the way they want, without fearing the oppressive right.

>>58438189
You're welcome. If we all put our efforts toward eradicating these "evil-spreading" websites, maybe we can all reach the point where nobody gets infected with hate because there's no one to infect them.

>>58438199
Would the good guy be evil for fighting evil?
I wish I didn't have to punish these misguided people, but if it results in a more tolerant world, then it's a good thing.

>>58438245
why not just target radicals regardless of the compass? there is media on other side that is just as hateful, though

also
>left vs right wing meme

>>58438281
Because a left-wing radical isn't nearly as bad as a right-wing moderate, if at all.
The left fights for a better world for everybody. The right fights for a better world only for them (and as a consequence, they end up fucking everything for themselves too).

>>58438245
>>58438312
Are you turning this into a YRYL thread?

>>58438312
>better world for everybody
okay yeah, good bait, I actually fell for it
I'll give you credit for that
I'll stop now

Is 4chan finally going to go under now?

>>58438329
Do you mean that thinking about right wingers enrages you, or that you're a right-winger yourself and are getting triggered by my activism?

>>58438339
What do you mean?

File: 1465588683353.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>58438348
>activism
nice

>>58438074
Feels like reading the Manjaro site.

>>58438312
You are so naive, Im not sure if baiting or not.

>>58437172
there are other ways besides fucking ads

>>58434972
I agree. It seems like with every passing year the average website is as cancerous with ads as a scam or fetish porno site was 10 years ago. It's kind of ridiculous.

>>58437347
Thanks for the idea. Im sure /pol will love this.

>>58438396
This will benefit everyone. Ad companies are a monster that everyone needs to fight regardless of political views

>>58438396
Please don't tell them. You'll only make the world a worse place by suppressing the spreading of ideas.
You should tell leftypol and other liberal communities, so we stop hate instead of stopping progress.

>>58438391
Like what? NEETs donating their welfare payments?

>>58438465
Im a white male, the left hates me more than anything imaginable. One day you will be over 30 and grow out of this silly liberal phase your stuck in now.

Has anyone gotten this to work for 4chan? It's saying for me it hasn't detected any ads yet.

>>58438535
Not true.
That's just your victim mentality speaking.
We don't hate anybody, except people who are intolerant and hateful (regardless of race).
If you're white but aren't a bigot right-winger, then we don't hate you.
Many (if not most) of us are white (I myself am a white male), and recognize the damage that whites and their culture (based on right-wing ideals) has done to everyone else, so they're trying to change it because it's the right thing to do, despite not benefitting them (which is extremely brave, unlike right-wingers who enjoy a life of undeserved privileges and actually fight those who want to fix things for everybody, because they don't want to lose their comfy life).

Also what does my age have to do with anything? You don't even know how old I am, and it still doesn't matter because people fo all ages (from children to really old people) can be both left and right wing, so you can't say being one or the other is something for a certain age group.
If that was the case, then all liberals would be young and all right-wingers would be old, but we all know it doesn't work like that, and that there are as many old left-wingers as there are young right-wingers (and vice-versa).

>>58437347
describe your process please.

can this be done on a rpi? would love to stick it to the man at a low cost to me

>>58437347
>>58438715

could this be automated? something like a crawler just moving from site to site clicking ads automatically (for a set period of time/clicks) and then moving on?

>>58438715
>>58438730
Probably, I don't know.
All ads are different, so I can't use things like imacros without finetuning the script for each network and banner.
All I do is opening the website page and using a program called Axife Mouse Recorder to record the movement of my mouse while I click on the ad, close it (whether it's a popup, a tab, or whatever), and return to the initial position.
I can set the program to do this movement as much as I want, so I just leave it running indefinitely until I have to turn it off.

>>58438769
I understand. Thanks. Maybe I could set something like this up in a VM and just let it run for as long as my pc is on.

>>58438715
>>58438730
>>58438769
Forgot to add, you can also set the speed that the recording is reenacted at (to make it go faster than what you recorded it), and also open multiple instances of it by using VMs, but I don't have a powerful enough computer for that.

>>58438785
You're welcome comrade!
I hope you'll be using this powerful weapon for good.

>>58438788
Isn't there a Python script that's similar to that?

>>58436746
r8 m8??

File: 1454192179111.png (213KB, 442x341px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 442x341px

>>58437347
That set up would get YOU banned in an hour. You would need proxies, cookies, browser fingerprints in order for that to work. Please ignore this retard. People make tons of money scamming and it is way more complicated. Nice bait though.

>>58438821
so if it gets the clicker banned wheres the loss? will i not see ads anymore?

>>58438821
I just use Firefox with Cookies Manager+ set to never save any cookie and as far as I know I never got banned (banned from what exactly? from viewing the ads?). They just think I'm the website owner and after a while they ban him (I know this from seeing them change networks and removing the ads).

>>58438840
You'll have to fill out captchas for the rest of your days like you're a Tor node and some services will blacklist your IP from their services (In particular email)

>blocked by google
>even manual installation

This must be really, really brilliant then. Installed in a heartbeat.

I wish there was a way to just spam clicks at the speed of light to get certain websites banned off advertising networks.

>>58438864
Nope cookies are a good thing. They help add validity to the visitor. You need other peoples cookies or craft your own. You're fucking up.

>>58438892
If broadcasting that you want to be spied on and allowing it adds "validity", then I want to be as invalid as possible.

>>58438892
My results tell me otherwise.
Unless it's a coincidence that each time I do this the site changes in the exact same way it would if my method had been effective.

>>58438704
I used to be a liberal and think just exactly like you. All I want to say to you is that one day you might think differently about everything you thought you understood about how things really are. I would like to talk about your bullshit post, but this is a tech board.

>>58434972
>You have ads in fucking Windows 10 now without even opening a browser.

I thought /g/ was supposed to know a lot about tech, but it seems all they know is FUD from other posters.

>>58438909
Guess what? You can change your cookie files to someone else's! Much anonymity while appearing normal; better to blend in. If you automatically block all scripts/cookies sites know.

>>58438911
>muh anecdotes
Listen, you're setup just got you blacklisted (they don't register your click). No network will accept spam and they can identify you through more than your IP. So if you are doing this without the modifying all those other things you're wasting your time.

t. spent five seconds on a card forum

>>58439036
Guess you just don't belong here.
bye

>>58438997
What's funny is that I used to be a right-winger too. I went from being all about family values and all that bullshit, until I went to college and got educated on the matter, realizing how wrong I was, and learning (from people who actually dedicated their whole life to understanding how this stuff works) about how the world is for certain people and how to make it a better place.
I know for a fact that your ideology is objectively wrong and obsolete in a world of diversity like the one we live in.
You just believe it's the right one because everybody thinks they're right (I mean, who holds an opinion while believing it's wrong?!?),
and that they understand "how things really are", without actually knowing what they're talking about.
It's not a coincidence that there's a clear trend in ideology between the educated and the non-educated. Guess who tends to be liberal and who tends to be conservative.

I won't completely exclude the possibility of changing and becoming like you, but I'm positive thet it's a pretty small chance.

>>58438997
>about things really are
AKA jewspiricy theories and cuck/SJW/nigger agendas. Listen to validated statistics and their interpretation by social scientists (yes they're a valid discipline, useful to interpret statistics).

>>58439053
You're free to not believe me. I'm not here to convince you.
I know it worked, so I don't care if you think it doesn't work in theory, because I've seen time and time again that in practice it ended up working.

>t. spent five seconds on a card forum
What does that mean?

>>58439169
A carding forum is a place where bad people talk about scamming like credit card fraud, amazon returns, and yes scamming ad networks for example.

>>58439202
Interesting.
Do you know any good one?
Are they on the clearnet or the dark web?

>>58439169
lol this kid is using reverse trick to get info on carding forums lmao

>>58439149
This pretty much. Educated people tend to lean left. If you lean right, chances are you're unintelligent, uneducated and/or fueled by shortsighted greed and self-interest.

>>58439215
Both. Primarily I know most are on TOR. Theres groups who have their secret protocols and groups who chill on IRC. They're not hard to find.

>>58434763
dae le epic /trash/ meme xxxDDDDD

>>58437127
That was taken out of context. The full quote was this:

"If you kill your enemies, they win...unless of course you wipe out all their children and friends as well, then you win."

>>58439238
Cats out of the bag 5 years ago grandpa. More fruit.

File: costanza_drake.png (230KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 640x360px

>>58439243
This is very dangerous thinking.

>team blue is smart
>team red is dumb
>if you like team red you're probably dumb

>>58439255
Ah that's neat.
Do you know of any with good/active sections about the web ads thing?

>>58439036
2 rupies have been deposited to your account rajeet pajesh
thank you for your continued patronage, microsoft supports your efforts

>>58439276
I'll explain it in very simple terms Anon, so you can understand:
If being part of a team means subscribing to the ideology of said team, and this ideology is objectively dumb, it means that you believe in objectively dumb ideologies and therefore are likely to be dumb yourself (since it's easier for a dumb person to believe something dumb, than for a smart one).

>>58439276
I'd say reducing political ideologies, motivations and behaviors to colors is dangerous thinking.

>>58439350
Yeah that's what I was getting at

>>58439295
Now I can't give that out because it is illegal and therefor wrong. You didn't even pay me. niggercardz1488.net

>>58439367
But that's what you did, which is entirely different than holding left or right wing ideologies.

File: helliamg.jpg (39KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1024x768px

>>58439243
The truly educated people are in the middle, because they realize both sides have good ideas.

>>58439379
Alright, fair enough.
I was just interested in learning more about how ads work to improve my strategy and be more effective with my activism.

File: 318.png (23KB, 200x201px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 200x201px

>>58439344
>it's just another smug leftard thinking he's got it all figured out
>people STILL fall for this

>>58439380
Just saying I boiled it down to colors to mock the other guy who is basically saying "liberal smart, conservative dumb"

Saying x is smart, y is dumb is the same as saying blue is smart, red is dumb. They're just variables :)

>>58439426
This post was written by a climate-change denying conservative.

>>58439408
Except the smug libtard's ideas are backed by people who spent their lives learning about how this stuff works, while right wingers are backed by demagogues angering them about a problem just to offer themselves as a solution, to gain power and success by being elected.
You're all being exploited and still feel superior.

>>58439478
Thanks to this sort of attitudes, you ensure it's those exact people who will get elected across the whole planet this time. Thanks for helping them with your liberal smugness. I'm sure it all looks so simple when you're 20 and haven't worked a single day in your life.

>>58439149
Fuck off with your politics om this board. I have an education also, you are not somehow special in this regard. You immediately start off telling me how I feel, and how I'm a victim somehow. Always the same indoctrination, its always the same with you people. Fuck off with your politics somewhere else you smug piece of shit.

File: 8fa.jpg (11KB, 183x232px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 183x232px

>check source, its basically built upon uBlock Origin
>Try it out on the obvious candidates for cancerous adds like facebook and buzzfeed
>get nothing because uMatrix blocks all 3rd party trackers and ad networks by default

>>58434863
>I feel that the more we fight against ad networks, the stronger they're going to get.

There are more of us than there are of them.

This is why barricading yourself in your "castle" (actual castle, or fortified home) don't work any more and haven't since the invention of gun powder. This is why "preppers" who are people-hostile (AOTK) will be "the first ones up against the wall when the revolution comes."

Fuck all the ad networks. They've thrown dead goats down the well of good will for 20 years. Purple gorillas everywhere.

Use an ad blocker, or use a hosts file. And if you can poison their databases on top of that, do that too.

>banned by google

Because it totally destroys the "google ads" business if implemented widely.

<grumpy cat> Good. </grumpy cat>

Fuck 'em.

>>58439516
Do you expect me to pretend the opinion of a PhD who studied his discipline all his life is on par with that of a random guy who doesn't know anything about it and believes the opposite of what the PhD knows?
Why? Just because the masses of angry ignorants might get angry?
Truth shouldn't be afraid of ignorance. We should stick with our ideals because in the end they'll be the ones to prevail.
Paraphrasing Barack Hussein Obama II:
We're on the right side of history. Get over it!

>>58439536
Well it certainly seems that I'm right when I say you're an angry person lol.
You're just butthurt about it.

>>58439584
Lol I had the same exact problem

>>58439625
Argument from authority, discarded. Argumentum ad hominem, discarded.

And who is this "PhD" who studied his "discipline" all his life, exactly? What is this discipline? Do we count sociology as a valid field of research now?

I've got to thank you though, were it not for smug, jobless millenials like you, we'd never muster so much support for right-wing politics again in the western world. Thanks for doing your part to get us all back on track.

>>58434972
It's just the evolution of the media. Radio and tv went throught the same shit; they both started fairly honest and lacking ads, then people realized the potential being "wasted" and filled in the gaps. The internet is no different, maybe even less honest and tracking free in it's early days relative to traditional media. Outside of the few Comp/Elec Sci/Eng students/faculty, the early internet was largely controlled by the same organizations which seek to inflitrated our private lives now for the sake of "security" (really it's all about money, always has been, always will be).

You'd think that such a decentralized form of communication/information sharing tech would be, well, less centralized. But it also seem inevitable at this point that the internet will become a handful of sites in the not to distant future, and creating your own server would be looked at suspicously (why do you need that? Are you trying to create fake news? Advertise illegally? Spread fear and misinfo?).

TLDR:
Doesn't matter if you block them, click on all of them, or just ignore them; everything you do or don't do is a form of data "they" can use to understand how to control the masses (with consumerism, fear, entertainment, etc).

>>58439399
>The truly educated people are in the middle, because they realize both sides have good ideas.

"I occupy the center-left to the center-right" -- Hillary Clinton

What that fucking even means is up to the reader. Political Rorschach test.

>both sides are right.

False equivalency. A statement is either false or true. An argument has to depend on the chain of every statement for it to be valid. If it fails on the first statement, the whole argument is invalid.

Therefore, "both sides are right" is a bullshit assertion because /someone/ has to be wrong.

Logic 101.

Everyone has an opinion. They are not entitled to their own facts. Facts exist independent of opinions.

Lastly,

Facts have a liberal bias.

>>58439690
>>58439690
>Doesn't matter if you block them, click on all of them, or just ignore them; everything you do or don't do is a form of data "they" can use to understand how to control the masses (with consumerism, fear, entertainment, etc).
Then let them have as much data as they possibly can handle. Everyone clicks everything. Everyone likes everything. Try making sense out of that, and try convincing anyone it's worth paying money for.

>>58439478
But right and left doesn't even mean the same thing depending on where you're at, it's a meaningless distinction
There just are retards feeling entitled to express their opinions, idiots listening to them and career politicians raking in these sweet state political party subventions. They get labelled right or left depending on how conservative their "ideas" are relative to one another

>>58438245
>peaceful, tolerant and inclusive1
1)For everyone except white males

>>58438312
The left fights for a better world for everybody2
2)Except for white males

File: 8e7.png (74KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1024x1024px

>>58439705

>>58439705
I didn't say both sides are right, I said both sides *can* have good ideas.

Do you believe both liberals and conservatives can have good ideas?

Or do you believe only one "side" is capable of having good ideas?

If you pick the latter, then I say you're not a very rational human being.

>>58439670
>Scientists unanimously state climate change is real and an actual threat to humanity
>Some regular joe on 4chan who hasn't studied the topic at all responds: "Argument from authority, discarded."

And people wonder why the right is associated with low IQ and lack of education.

>>58439705
>Therefore, "both sides are right" is a bullshit assertion because /someone/ has to be wrong.

Not necessarily. That assumes that one is "right" to begin with.

They could both be wrong.

or

They could both be tip toeing around "right" but never really confirming they truely believe in what is "right" or would actually commit to doing anything to stop the "wrong" thing from happening.

That's politics 101.

Don't commit to anything that the majority hasn't commited too and keep your policies as vague as possible so that you can change them with little resistance.

File: (You).jpg (34KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 300x300px

>>58439670
>Argument from authority, discarded. Argumentum ad hominem, discarded.
I'm sure you believe pic related is a valid point, because the word of people who actually know what they're talking about is worth the same as the one of people who can barely read, right?
When you feel sick you go ask a doctor what he thinks, no? If the doctor tells you something, and smeone who's not a doctor tells you the opposite, who are you going to believe?
Also, you committed a fallacy known as argument from fallacy. Discarded.
>yfw two can play this game.

>>And who is this "PhD" who studied his "discipline" all his life, exactly? What is this discipline? Do we count sociology as a valid field of research now?
Virtually every college professor in basically all the subjects.
Specifically sociology (just because you don't like its conclusions it doesn't mean it's not valid), psychology, history, anthropology, and all those "leftist" ones, such as gender studies et similia.

>I've got to thank you though, were it not for smug, jobless millenials like you, we'd never muster so much support for right-wing politics again in the western world. Thanks for doing your part to get us all back on track.
Enjoy your 4 years of Trump fucking everything up and giving us even more reasons for the biggest "told you so" in history, when everyone will realize this right-wing phase has been a seriously bad idea and goes back in full force to the left, where they'll stay for a long long time.

>>58439775
>Scientists unanimously state climate change is real and an actual threat to humanity

No, they don't. Unless you think that study which counted papers from all fields that did not explicitly deny "climate change" (used to be called global warming until they realized it's hard to sell that when it's getting colder) as agreeing with "climate change" as valid.

Keep fighting the good fight man. The more posts you make like this the more people will start hating everything connected with the political left with a passion. I know you're just a small part of tumblr but if each one of you repulses only 20 people it's 20 million more votes for traditional, conservative politicians. Thanks for taking one for the team and making everybody disgusted with yourself so that we can have a better, saner world.

>>58439824
>bunch of jobless bums with gender study degrees who would struggle to get hired by mcdonalds agree with me so I'm right

Thanks for playing but when you listed sociology, psychology and "gender studies" (lol) majors as authorities you immediately outed yourself as a troll

File: 1482957285928.png (80KB, 639x201px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 639x201px

>>58439830

File: IMG_20161127_225448_538.jpg (99KB, 1600x1203px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1600x1203px

>>58439243
I lean left but you need to fuck off. A higher rate of uneducated people doesn't mean it's the majority of the party. Plus the right encompasses almost half the population, you can't just dismiss this large a group.

>>58439735
Of course it's a label. How am I supposed to talk about a group of people without listing everything they believe in?
A label is the only way.
From the context you understand that I'm talking about the social side of the issue (as opposed to the economic, political, etc).

>>58439736
We don't want to make the world worse for whites.
We just want everyone to have the same quality of life, and that is not possible when one group has a much better life at the expense of the others.
We just want to equalize things.

File: you-have-to-go-back.gif (348KB, 350x233px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 350x233px

>>58439889

>>58439830
>when /pol/ gets lost

>>58439729
This won't stop it.

For one, not enough people will adopt it fast enough before they come up with a solution that stops the masses from even considering it.

Second, the solution. I don't know if this is what they'd do, but it seems logical to me. The large players will change strategy: to even access their sites (or the sites on which they manage ad space) you'd need to get pass a "buffer" which pretty much blocks those using these add ons (many sites already use something like this, think umatrix and the sites that don't function properly unless you let some shit through).

Don't get me wrong, it doesn't hurt to fuck with the ad/data collection machine as much as possible, but why not just block it all and leave it at that? Or completely avoid the cancer sites altogether.

>>58439893
>A higher rate of uneducated people doesn't mean it's the majority of the party.

That's actually exactly what a majority is.

And these right wingers thing they're intelligent enough to handle anything that involves math.

>>58434757
t. tech illiterate

Here's the source
https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam

:^)

File: 2f60558a092fd4bfa5ad6495737847debc31fb278ce1171071a6161e69fdf8c0.png (255KB, 473x462px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 473x462px

>>58439149
>I know for a fact that your ideology is objectively wrong and obsolete in a world of diversity like the one we live in.

>You just believe it's the right one because everybody thinks they're right (I mean, who holds an opinion while believing it's wrong?!?),
and that they understand "how things really are", without actually knowing what they're talking about.

It's like you completely lack any self-awareness. You don't even bother explaining how caring about your family is 'objectively wrong' and harmful.
You just 'know' it and see everybody who doesn't agree as an idiot
>b-but my polls prove it!
Well guess what, retard, crime statistics also prove that Blacks commit an unproportionately high number of crimes, not only in America, but pretty much every other country, wether as a majority or minority, but you're willing to ignore that because it doesn't fit your agenda, or it's White people's fault because of muh raycism and colonization.
Have you ever even considered holding stupid White conservatives to the same standards as stupid Black people who murder and rape?
That they're poor, being discriminated against, see no chance of bettering their situation and are just generallly down in their luck?
Are you also making fun of religious muslims or Black Panthers like you are of Christians and White Nationalists?

No, of course not. You're just a college kid in your 20s, who finally got some pussy by nodding your way through conversations with brain-dead sluts and and getting a degree for repeating the 'scientific consesus' your professors invented back to them and believing you've stumbled upon some greater truth.

Fuck you.

>>58439865
You're mistaking the students of those disciplines with the professors and scholars.
The first group just learns from the second, which is actually made of experts who know what they're doing and are actually successful and world-renowned because of it.

>>58437184
this
>>58438391
>shilling that hard for passes

>>58439830
>used to be called global warming until they realized it's hard to sell that when it's getting colder
That's wrong though. They changed it because denialist were like "It'll get warmer? Count me in!" They had to make the implication that there are global impacts beyond simple warming.

And denialists are fucking retarded, like yourself.

>>58439775
CC is just really really inconsistent. You can look back only a hundred years and laugh at what science told us. Don't be so cocky.

>>58439933
>That's actually exactly what a majority is.
What the hell are you talking about? Let me pull numbers out of my ass just to demonstrate that to be untrue.
>The left: 10% have no college education
>The right: 15% have no college education

Amazing, right?

>>58434771
>banned by google
How much good do you have to do to be banned by google?

>>58434640
>.io
>"startup"
>does really shady shit

kek

>>58440035
High income successful people overwhelming vote right. Victims and gibs vote overwhelming left. Have fun explaining to the next generation why your country is a ghetto, because you thought it would be a good idea to bring everyone down a notch.

>>58439830
>"climate change" (used to be called global warming until they realized it's hard to sell that when it's getting colder)

Climate change is nothing new. It's just that the vast majority of the head scratching primates were completely oblivious to these concepts until very recently. We like to think we live in some kind of closed system where things would remain static if humans weren't around to fuck things up, but that's just untrue. It is a very dynamic system that is and has been changing since it began.

The question isn't if it's changing, or even if its' going up (hot) or down (cold), it's if wether or not our human effects (pollution, degradation of landscape and oceans) are increasing that change significantly (so that it is on a human scale).

You'd have to completely dismiss the scientific data as fraudlent to not accept the truth that humans are having a significant impact on current climate change.

>global warming
Always was a buzz phrase and still is for the masses. Doesn't mean "climate change" is the new buzz phrase, but that people are starting to understand we lack sufficient knowledge of Earth's cycles to determine if it is truely warming, or if it is just becoming more chaotic, leading towards cooling/ice age. It really depends on the scale of time; short term (human years) may seem like it's warming, but long term it could very well be cooling.

>getting colder
Depends where you measure. The Arctic is undeniably getting warmer, seen in the mass melting of ice these past decades. Glaciers in many mountains have also been shrinking significantly in the past three decades.

>>58440071
Put /a/ as your homepage in a 4chan browser

>>58440236
It depends on what climate model you believe in. They change every few years. Large parts of my country would literally be underwater if you took Al Gore and his moovie seriously, and the models they used at the time.

>>58439945
>>It's like you completely lack any self-awareness. You don't even bother explaining how caring about your family is 'objectively wrong' and harmful.
>You just 'know' it and see everybody who doesn't agree as an idiot
I didn't say that.
I still think it's a good thing (I mean, it's not like I prefer deadbeat parents lmao). Just that it's not the most important thing in the world like some right-wingers think.
I simply used it as an example of the kind of mentality I had, which i now think was bullshit in general, but had some good things (like caring about our family, which is different than being "all about family values" and little else).

>Well guess what, retard, crime statistics also prove that Blacks commit an unproportionately high number of crimes, not only in America, but pretty much every other country, wether as a majority or minority, but you're willing to ignore that because it doesn't fit your agenda, or it's White people's fault because of muh raycism and colonization.
Tell me one country where blacks live like whites but still act like niggers.
Until then, it'll be obvious that they act that way because of their environment (and whites who grew up in similar environments act in a very similar way, like in eastern Europe or even poor whites in America for example).
Blacks growing up in a normal non-poverty, non-ghetto family are mostly like MKBHD.

>Have you ever even considered holding stupid White conservatives to the same standards as stupid Black people who murder and rape?
Yes. I hate niggers as much as you. I just believe they act like that because they grew up in an environment that made them like that.

>That they're poor, being discriminated against, see no chance of bettering their situation and are just generallly down in their luck?
Poor whites are still white.
A rich black is more privileged than a poor white, but when you compare whites and blacks from the same "bracket", whites have it way better than other races.

(1/2)

>>58440024
You can look back on anything really and laugh. We, or at least enough of us, were wrong about many things in the past and are most definitely wrong about things now, and will be wrong about things in the future. But there is always a select few who are right or close to right. But they always get ignored by the masses. Even now, the masses still hold onto ideas of stupid scientists warning about cc or gw in the past, instead of just ignoring that and actually discovering that that was just the majority consensus (which is usually wrong anyways) and there was a minority even in the past that was basically on the right path. It is common accross all disciplines in science; the masses are always slow on the uptake unless it is something physical they can grab onto and use.

>>58437347
>People I disagree with shouldn't be allowed to speak
>So I go to autistic length trying to harm them but accomplish ultimately nothing
> (Also I swear that I am not a facist although I talk like a facist, act like a facist and surround myself with facist)


Antifa pls leave.

>>58439945
>>58440370
(Continued...)

>Are you also making fun of religious muslims or Black Panthers like you are of Christians and White Nationalists?
I hate muslim extremists who kill innocents, but I also believe that they're an infinitesimal part of all muslims.
I don't hate the rest, just like I don't hate non-extremist christians.
Regarding the black panthers, I wish they didn't exist, but in our world they're basically a necessity if we want equality for blacks in America. I may disagree with some of their ways, but sadly in the real world the end justifies the means, and if that's what it takes to reach that goal, then they're a necessary evil.

>No, of course not. You're just a college kid in your 20s, who finally got some pussy by nodding your way through conversations with brain-dead sluts and and getting a degree for repeating the 'scientific consesus' your professors invented back to them and believing you've stumbled upon some greater truth.
Whoa, nice analysis there buddy. Except the part there it's all wrong (like the asusmptions you made above).

>Fuck you.
Nice touch.
Now I know you're truly a thinker and not an angry bigot.

(2/2)

>>58440370
>liberalism came full circle and is now back at judging people and classifying them into groups based on the colour of their skin

>>58440380
I have nothing against people I disagree with.
It's just people who propagate dangerous ideas that are highly problematic and hurt the world.

For example, I think the same of ISIS propaganda.
Wouldn't you want to censor their propaganda, if that meant that less people would get indoctrinated by them?
Or you'd let them brainwash people because you believe in free speech for everybody, so you value their "opinion" as much as you value yours?

Please educate yourself about the distinction between free speech and hate speech.

>>58440374
>The masses
Disgusting elitism.
Yes, the vast majority of scientists who depend on funding for agreeing a certain way about cc, will say whatever they have to about cc to keep said funding. Pure coincidence.

>>58440346
>climate model you believe in

Models are part of the problem though. We shouldn't even bother with them outside of entertainment/curiosity at this point. Actual "scientists" trying to use them to prove their agenda isn't helping anything right now because they are just adding to the noise with information they know lacks sufficient data to be accurate.

Until we understand more about the Earth's biggest factor in climate: the Sun, we should just stick to short term weather forecasting and try to preserve our natural resources as best as possible, not for climate change agenda's, but for future generations. Spaceship Earth and what not.

>>58440415
What do you mean?
Of course I'm going to talk about groups of people based on their race, gender, etc.
As long as the world treats them differently and paints them under different lights, we have to fix the situation so that the distinction is erased and we can finally stop looking at race.
Until then, we'll have to see those groups of people as a separate group because that's the society we live in. wether we like it or not.

>>58440435
If "free speech" doesn't also include what a smalll group considers "hate speech" then it's a meaningless distinction. By definition it's not free if it's restricted. It's really that simple. Anyone can say that they allow all speech to be free as long as they agree with it. The hard part is also having the speech you don't like be free.

>>58440435
You cant censor an idea. Free speech is a human right. Fascism will come from the left in this century, that much is already gauranteed.

>>58440389
>infinitesimal
Almost all terrorist are Muslims or Communists.

>I don't hate non-extremist christians.
There are no Christian extremists (who harm anybody).

>equality for blacks
No one wants that, especially not blacks.
Blacks are equal by law which is enough.
If you want them to be more equal you have to enslave them as they have every opportunity to become equal and are not taking them.

Freedom and equality are essentially incompatible.
As Solzhenitsyn said:
Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.

>>58439784
>That assumes that one is "right" to begin with.

No, "one side is wrong" is a subset of "both sides are wrong"

Idiot.

>politics 101

Nobody ever said that political arguments are valid by default. I was talking about valid arguments and the requirements for them. If you're a politician and you're afraid of presenting a valid argument (tip-toeing around "right), then grow a fucking spine.

>>58440484
The mental gymnastics you go through to justify your ideas is very entertaining. Im just happy to sit and read, comfortable in my knowledge that you are not somewhere else, being productive or enjoyed a nice date with your boyfriend.

>>58440496
>>58440504
As I said, I have no problem with opinions I disagree with. Only with those that are objectively harmful for society.
Obviously that makes free speech a bit less free, but it's an acceptable price to pay if it means freeing the world of evil.

Answer my question about censoring ISIS propaganda please.

>>58440464
I was grouping those types of scientists into the masses as well. It should be taken as a given that anyone who associates themselves with mainstream ________, should be considered just another mouthpiece for the agenda of controlling the masses, and therefore is part of the masses themselves.

Obviously there are some who fall through the cracks in that scenario, and come up with research that will or should be used for progressing further, but usually, they end up with the rest, at seemingly backwater establishments that seem to never get any respect from the masses, because that's how the true elites want it; too keep the masses from discovering actual truths that counter their agendas.

>>58440435
>I have nothing against people I disagree with.
>It's just people who propagate dangerous ideas that are highly problematic and hurt the world.
This is a contradiction.
If you accept freedom of speech you have to except everyone's freedom of speech for everyone.


>For example, I think the same of ISIS propaganda.
>Wouldn't you want to censor their propaganda, if that meant that less people would get indoctrinated by them?
They are not protected by the laws concerning freedom of speech.
It is ridiculous to equate media with different opinions to a terrorist organization.

>>58440550
"Yes, we were totally wrong about CC ten or fifteen years ago, but were totally right now! Your an idiot if you don't believe what we say.'' "Trust us! "
Yeah fuck off.

>>58440550
>As I said, I have no problem with opinions I disagree with. Only with those that are objectively harmful for society.

And which are those?

Who is to sit in judgement of what is harmful to society?

The American Family Association?

Say hello to the gallows for looking at under-age tentacle-porn

>acceptable price to pay

Are you willing to pay /that/ price?

>>58440550
>ISIS propaganda
ISIS is not protected by freedom of speech they are a FOREIGN terrorist organization. They do NOT have the rights of an American or European citizen or news organization.
Also most of their propaganda violates laws.

This is NOT the case for people with different opinions.

>>58434771
What the fuck
I'm in now

>>58440511
>Almost all terrorist are Muslims or Communists.
But still a very small part of all muslims, who have absolutely nothing to do with their "black sheep" extremists.

>There are no Christian extremists (who harm anybody).
Unless you count fighting against the rights of groups that their religion doesn't like, in which case they're not hurting them physically, but still ruining their lives.

>No one wants that, especially not blacks.
What?

>Blacks are equal by law which is enough.
Is enough for you (presumably a white male), but not for blacks, since they're still subject to racism and discrimination in all parts of society. We're fighting to end that.

>If you want them to be more equal you have to enslave them as they have every opportunity to become equal and are not taking them.
They've only been free for a few decades, while still living in conditions that make it very difficult to achieve social mobility.
When we erase the difference between the treatment of whites and blacks, and they still have no upward social mobility, then you can tell me that they're not taking the opportunities.

>Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.
Well, for starters we can talk about equality of opportunity, then we can talk about equality of outcome.

>>58440548
>being productive

In what way? The vast majority of "productiveness" being done in this world is only productive relative to our need for money, which is to say, not necessarily productive relative to the needs of humans. I'd venture to say that the majority of "productiveness" falls into the "need for money" category and the "needs for humans" is a minority category at this point. Plus, it's winter...too cold and actually a waste of energy pretending to be productive.

>>58437347
you're also full of shit because nobody's getting banned from a single ip clicking ads, especially in such an idiotic way (hundreds per day)

Sure is technology in this thread. Love all the technology being talked about.

>>58434640
Is there anyway I could do this with unbound or squid?

File: 1377954328407.jpg (140KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 480x360px

>>58438108
>Can Canadians do anything right?

Single-payer health care and gun control.

>>58440550
ISIS propaganda is no different than what is coming from any other part of the world. I see no reason to censor it. If its a bad idea, the world will reject it. If the people choose it, its called democracy.

>>58440664
>who have absolutely nothing to do with their "black sheep" extremists.
Terrorist are Muslims.
That should be enough.

>Unless you count fighting against the rights of groups that their religion doesn't like, in which case they're not hurting them physically, but still ruining their lives.
It's no illegal to fight for beliefs different to yours.

>Is enough for you (presumably a white male), but not for blacks, since they're still subject to racism and discrimination in all parts of society. We're fighting to end that.
There is no racism except for fringe cases.
Maybe 0.00001% of the population care about race and you are not going to change their minds.
>They've only been free for a few decades, while still living in conditions that make it very difficult to achieve social mobility.
When we erase the difference between the treatment of whites and blacks, and they still have no upward social mobility, then you can tell me that they're not taking the opportunities.
Blatant lies you are telling yourself so that you can opress both black and whites without guilt.

>Well, for starters we can talk about equality of opportunity, then we can talk about equality of outcome.
Exactly.
Blacks have Equal opportunity but not equal outcome.
Forcing an equal outcome makes you an oppressive dictator.
As you have to surpress bother the wills of the Black and white people.

>>58440511
>Almost all terrorist are Muslims or Communists.
Do you have any idea how many Muslims there actually are? Terrorists are a tiny fraction.
>There are no Christian extremists (who harm anybody).
Because Christianity is mostly confined to developed nations, but there actually is Christian terrorist groups in Africa and stuff:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-balaka
>No one wants that, especially not blacks.
>If you want them to be more equal you have to enslave them
Fuckin wot?

>Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.
We are not talking financially equal. Equal opportunity, which you will (retardedly) claim everyone has.

>>58440590
>Moving the goalposts.
I'm not even talking about climate change

>>58440615
PhDs who know how human nature and human societies work can tell us accurately what's harmful and what's not.

>>58440635
Alright, then take the Black Panthers, BLM, some communist group, or any domestic group you think is brainwashing people with their harmful ideals.
Would you want them to spread their ideology and make the world into what you think is a worse place?
Wouldn't silencing them make a difference for the better in the world?

>Also most of their propaganda violates laws.
I don't care about laws, as I'm not talking about silencing them by taking them to court.

>This is NOT the case for people with different opinions.
Again, if you have different opinions that aren't problematic or downright harmful to society, then you can say whatever you want and I won't care.

>>58440754
Not true.
Bad ideas get popular all the time, and it doesn't even take the majority of the people to adopt an ideology to significantly damage society.

>>58440677
This is why people hate you

File: 1473529231985.jpg (65KB, 640x736px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x736px

>>58440760
>There is no racism except for fringe cases.
>Maybe 0.00001% of the population care about race and you are not going to change their minds.

>Terrorist are Muslims.
>That should be enough.

THE IRONING

>>58440773
>Do you have any idea how many Muslims there actually are? >Terrorists are a tiny fraction.

Not surprising, considering only a tiny fraction of all people ever does anything out of the ordinary.

But of all terrorists, an overwhelming majority are muslims. How come? Is it because they are a violent religion that openly encourages murder against infidels and forceful conversions?

Ever heard about the islamic House of War?

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Dar_al-Harb

>>58440780
>Would you want them to spread their ideology and make the world into what you think is a worse place?
Stoping them is even worse.
If you keep there Ideas in the open they will get ridiculed and mocked.
If you drive them into the underground they will grow stronger as there is no one to counter them.
That is what the left never understood.
You can ONLY fight facism/racism if argue with them.
You will not change their mind, but everyone else's.
>Wouldn't silencing them make a difference for the better in the world?
No.

>>58440807
I want to correct myself.
Including left wing ideologues the number goes to 10%.

>>58440760
>Terrorist are Muslims. That should be enough.
>Mafia members are Italians, so all Italians are at fault for the mafia

>It's no illegal to fight for beliefs different to yours.
I'm not the police. I don't punish people based on the law. There are a lot of bad things that are legal because the majority of people likes them. All I'm doing is doing my part to limit the spreading of those bad things. Regardless if they're legal or not.

>There is no racism except for fringe cases.
>Maybe 0.00001% of the population care about race and you are not going to change their minds.
Self-evidently false.

>Blatant lies you are telling yourself so that you can opress both black and whites without guilt.
What?
Please elaborate.

>Blacks have Equal opportunity but not equal outcome.
False.
They grow up in different social and economic situations, and are treated differently for the color of their skin.
A quick example would be the huge number of employers trashing resumes with a black-sounding name on it, without even reading it. Don't tell me it doesn't happen often.

>Forcing an equal outcome makes you an oppressive dictator.
I don't want to force an equal outcome.
I just want to force the equal opportunities, so that the equal outcome comes on its own.

>>58440807
Islam is not compatible with Western ideas of free speech, basic human rights, equality, and tolerance. Yet the West is importing Muslims at an alarming rate. Irony.

>>58439824
>pic
https://youtu.be/wMFPe-DwULM
>basically tells reporter that he is too stupid to understand any explanation Feynman can give him
how could that man be so based?
rip in peace ;_;

>>58440868
>If you keep there Ideas in the open they will get ridiculed and mocked.
Except that's not what's happening with right-wing ideology (or even radical islam, which is on the rise), so something has to be done.

>If you drive them into the underground they will grow stronger as there is no one to counter them.
Except I'm not a dictator censoring all of them. I'm just silencing a few, which makes a negligible difference on the whole movement.

>>58440780
>PhDs who know how human nature and human societies work can tell us accurately what's harmful and what's not.

No, they can't. PhDs are academics, who have led sheltered lives outside of normal society (academia is far from fucking normal). They do not know what is good for anyone except for themselves.

Just because someone has a PhD next to their name doesn't mean they're right about everything either. The fact that you don't know this means you are.... twelve years old, mentally.

So you are willing to allow the whims of a class of people, who are fallible and disconnected from the rest of society, to dictate to the rest of society what is "good for us?"

You are an authoritarian.

>>58440914
>Everyone who goes on ahead and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God.... If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house or give him any greeting, for whoever greets him takes part in his wicked works.

>For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Is it not those inside the church whom you are to judge? God judges those outside. “Purge the evil person from among you.”

>And they entered into a covenant to seek theLord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and with all their soul, but that whoever would not seek theLord, the God of Israel, should be put to death, whether young or old, man or woman.

Thanks Bible

>>58440796
Also why I hate people. Why can't they just relax and stop buying into the money game.

>>58440903
>I don't punish people based on the law
That is probably the most awful thing I have heard today.

>Self-evidently false.
Evidence?

>Blacks have Equal opportunity but not equal outcome.
False
Are you brain dead?
Have you seen crime statistics?
Have you seen any kind of statistics relating to race?
Claiming that blacks and whites have equal outcome is plain wrong.

>are treated differently for the color of their skin.
Self-evidently false.

A quick example would be the huge number of employers trashing resumes with a black-sounding name on it, without even reading it. Don't tell me it doesn't happen often.
It doesn't happen often.
For any racist in a hr office who hates black there are atleast a dozen blacks working there who prefer blacks.

>I just want to force the equal opportunities, so that the equal outcome comes on its own.
Listen closely.
There never will be equal outcome.
That would mean stripping all people from what makes them human.
People do not want to be equal.
Everyone strives to become better and go above the average of the masses.
Is there nothing in your life that you want to accomplish that would set you apart?
How would you feel if that was strapped away from you because it would make you unequal?

Equality was tried in the USSR and many millions had to pay the price.

>>58440985
>No, they can't. PhDs are academics, who have led sheltered lives outside of normal society (academia is far from fucking normal). They do not know what is good for anyone except for themselves.
Still better than someone who's only frame of reference is his anecdotal experience and a limited understanding of why those things happened to him (or in front of him), especially considering those academics use the scientific method and data to reach their conclusions. They don't just make them up.

>Just because someone has a PhD next to their name doesn't mean they're right about everything either. The fact that you don't know this means you are.... twelve years old, mentally.
I didn't say they're right about everything. Just that their opinion on their field of expertise is worth more than the opinion of someone who doesn't know anything about it.
The fact that you had trouble with the comprehension of my words means you are.... six years old, mentally.

>So you are willing to allow the whims of a class of people, who are fallible and disconnected from the rest of society, to dictate to the rest of society what is "good for us?"
Yes, since, unlike what you think of them, they're actually the ones with the competence to do so.
What's the alternative? Letting the masses decide what's good without understanding anything about how things work (with their lack of factual data and their limited experience)?

>>58440942
>Except that's not what's happening with right-wing ideology (or even radical islam, which is on the rise), so something has to be done.
Do you not understand that you caused Trump yourself?
Refusing to engage in discussion will strengthen them.
Trump won only because of that.
If the media and the people had engaged him in honest discussion he would have lost badly.
The same is happening in Germany the AfD here is only strong because people refuse to talk.

>Except I'm not a dictator censoring all of them
It doesn't matter whether you censore one or all.
Censorship validates them, why would anyone ban something instead of simply disproving it if it is false.

>>58441022
So you are trying to throw something you don't even believe in my face?
Should I tell you a story about how ever man, woman, and child was slaughtered in Cannan in that book?
Or 2 Corr 11.4?

>>58441042
>Have you seen crime statistics?
>Claiming that blacks and whites have equal outcome is plain wrong.
You keep... ignoring everything..... Fucking everything.... I can't believe this. This is not the argument. This was never argued against, but in your mind you felt it was. How is this possible? How is a delusion so strong?

>>58441101
>the holy scientific method is the ultimate guide upon which we should base all our decisions, only the enlightened academic caste can interpret its teachings and show us the way

this is what people talk about when they say modern science is basically a cult

>>58441146
It was an example.
I ONLY cared that there is difference between blacks and whites in outcome.
You said that different races have equal outcome which is completely false.

I don't care what the statistics say except that they say whites and blacks are different.

>>58441130
You say Islam is incompatible with Western ideals, but neither is Christianity.

>>58441185
>>58441146
Go look up the Minnesota school funding study. It's pure entertainment.

>>58441185
I wasn't the original guy you were talking to. I say you ignored everything because his argument all along was that the opportunity is not equal, but you totally abandoned that argument to point at crime statistics. You fuck

>>58441192
Its funny, that Western ideals sprang up in the midst of a Christian dominant society.

Would you rather have your daughter grow up in Egypt or England?

>>58441192
Except Christianity is what built the western civilization, along with Greek and Roman philosophy

>>58441042
>Evidence?
Racism is everywhere in America, and while most won't admit to treating a race worse than others, it sadly happens way more than with the 0.00001% of the population.

>>58441042
>Are you brain dead?
>Have you seen crime statistics?
>Have you seen any kind of statistics relating to race?
>Claiming that blacks and whites have equal outcome is plain wrong.
You have zero reading comprehension.
I didn't say that blacks and whites have equal outcome. I sait that they don't have equal outcome BECAUSE they don't have equal opportunity, and IF they had equal opportunity they'd have equal outcome.

>For any racist in a hr office who hates black there are atleast a dozen blacks working there who prefer blacks.
Maybe in the public sector. Not in the private.
Also this statement shows you too believe racism is a significant part of society, sicne you just said that blacks are racist against non-blacks.
Or do you believe only blacks discriminate racially, while other races don't do the same against blacks?

>There never will be equal outcome.
>That would mean stripping all people from what makes them human.
>People do not want to be equal.
>Everyone strives to become better and go above the average of the masses.
>Is there nothing in your life that you want to accomplish that would set you apart?
>How would you feel if that was strapped away from you because it would make you unequal?
I don't want to force equal outcome like in Harrison Bergeron. I just want to force equal opportunity because it's the bare minimum for a society with a tiny bit of justice, and I believe that this will lead to equal outcome (as groups, not as individuals, obviously). If it doesn't, then fine. No equal outcome.
But lack of equal opportunity is an injustice, regardless of whether you think it will lead of equal outcome or not.

>Equality was tried in the USSR and many millions had to pay the price.
That's because they tried to force equal outcome, not equal opportunity.

>>58441117
I'm not against discussion.
Censoring their websites doesn't remove the discussion, as it's a one-way channel where they spew hate and there's no way to prove them wrong.

>>58441237
He said to my statement:
Blacks have Equal opportunity but not equal outcome.
This:
False

Which is ridiculous beyond belief.
Not even debatable.

>>58441256
Down with the white man! Blacks were happily shooting lasers and zipping around in pyramid-shaped helicopters in Egypt, until the wretched whites came, and forced them to become pimps, prostitutes, and drug dealers!

If it weren't for those whites they would have probably colonized Mars by now!

>>58441101
>They don't just make them up.

Andrew Wakefield.

>I didn't say they're right about everything.

No, but to be expert enough to dictate to society about what is "good" you /have/ to know everything. But PhDs, as they are today, are specialists, not generalists.

>I'm six years old

No, YOU are ignoring reality.

>they're actually the ones with the competence to do so.

I once worked with someone who had both a PE and a Bar license.

He was incompetent in both, especially the engineering stuff, because he would /never/ go back and re-evaluate something in the middle of a process if it was going wrong. This was a habit he learned in giving legal arguments, and applied it to engineering. But he wasn't good enough to hang his own shingle and be a lawyer of his own practice or work for another practice.

Have a nice big cup of shut-the-fuck-up.

>>58441248
>>58441249
It's all the same shit guys. Modern government separates church and state for a good fucking reason, and that's because ALL religion is incompatible with modern Western ideals.

>>58441248
England because it's richer, more modernized, and less chaotic. She can convert to Islam I don't give a fuck.

It's not hard not to click ads, or to have some extension blocking them.

Seems pointless.

>>58441185
>You said that different races have equal outcome which is completely false.
I'm the guy typing the long responses, and I'm not >>58441146
Also, as I said here >>58441256 I didn't say that.

>>58441295
See original guy
>>58441256
You totally ignored the argument dude.

>>58434640

Yes goyim, yes. Download our botn-- addon, and block all the evil semitic ads!

>>58441256
Niggers are genetically inferior and regardless of income have lower IQ and reasoning ability. Fact.

>>58441256
>Racism is everywhere in America
Your written word is not evidence.

>you too believe racism is a significant part of society, sicne you just said that blacks are racist against non-blacks.
I believe that people are different and will act different and there is nothing in the world that could change that.
Discrimination is part of all our life's but fighting it will destroy our society.
And is not worth it as everything will balance out.

>I just want to force equal opportunity
There is nothing in the world you can do about that.
What little inequality exists is human nature itself.
You will not win that fight.

>>58441358
Not significantly.

>>58434972
>You have ads in fucking Windows 10

Why are you using windows 10?

>>58441294
>Censoring their websites doesn't remove the discussion
It may not.
But it legitimizes them.
I am willing to bet that anyone who got shut down got an immediate spike in donations.

It didn't do any good except hardening there support.

Loved it OP

>>58441304
?
Never said that.
Black obviously lived a simple life before the colonialists, but so did many other groups around Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. When they got civilized they prospered. Blacks never had the opportunity to do so.

>>58441358
That's debatable (which is a long debate for another day), but even if it was true, it still wouldn't be low enough to justify their current state.
Also blacks that grew up in normal families are more like MKBHD than Lil Wayne, so their supposedly lower IQ would still allow them to be respectable members of society at least.

>>58441386
>Your written word is not evidence.
Neither is yours.

>I believe that people are different and will act different and there is nothing in the world that could change that.
>Discrimination is part of all our life's but fighting it will destroy our society.
>And is not worth it as everything will balance out.
So you admit that racism exists in a significant amount?

>There is nothing in the world you can do about that.
The last century proves you wrong.

>What little inequality exists is human nature itself.
>You will not win that fight.
We'll see if that's true after we give equal opportunity to every group.

>>58441432
You're right about those cases, but they're a small percentage.
We're not talking abut Alex Jones here.
Most don't have a big/passionate enough fanbase to support them, and so they just close the website.
Also it's not like they know who did it and why.
They'll just think it's the ad networks being greedy or some kind of mistake or something.

>>58441386
It is human nature indeed to be afraid of the unfamiliar. But it is possible to overcome this with exposure. That's the whole purpose of the fight for diversity. Go to any big American city and you can see all sorts of different people getting along. In NYC you can find Chinese people running a Mexican restaurant that black people go to eat. And Jews stopping by the Halal carts for a Kebab from a Muslim. There's a reason why big cities are left-leaning, and the knowledge of a harmonious culture-mixed society is a part of that.

>>58441466
>Black obviously lived a simple life before the colonialists, but so did many other groups around Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. When they got civilized they prospered. Blacks never had the opportunity to do so.
I wonder why? Is it because when left to their own devices they consistently fuck up everything in their own countries, buy weapons, and start bloody wars that would make Hitler shudder with terror? Or the chief dictator just expels all white farmers because they're white, and then nobody produces food anymore, so everybody starves? Or the ruling party just enjoys living in luxury spending foreign aid money on cars, drugs and hookers? Could it be because of that? Or is the white man also somehow responsible for Africa being a shithole?

>>58441466
>So you admit that racism exists in a significant amount?
I admit that it is irrelevant for all of us.
Because we are both the oppressor and the oppressed and there is nothing to do about it.

>The last century proves you wrong.
We got rid of all environmental inequalities that we possibly could.
It didn't give the result you desired.
Going further requires the sacrifice of freedom.

>We'll see if that's true after we give equal opportunity to every group.
We have.
Aside from human nature there is no inequality left.
You can not fight nature itself and call your cause just.

>>58441524
>Or is the white man also somehow responsible for Africa being a shithole?
Denying this is kind of crazy

>>58441316
>Andrew Wakefield.
>One or a few episodes of something bad happening means that it happens regularly (or more often than not).
A smart boy like you will sure understand that exceptions are not the rules, right?

>No, but to be expert enough to dictate to society about what is "good" you /have/ to know everything. But PhDs, as they are today, are specialists, not generalists.
I didn't say that a PhD should tell us about everything in life.
Only that they should tell us about those parts that are studied in their fields, and of which they're experts.
The sum of these things allow us to decide much better what's harmful for society, than what some uneducated random guy on the street thinks.

>No, YOU are ignoring reality.
Literally "no u"

>>58441316
>I once worked with someone who had both a PE and a Bar license.
>He was incompetent in both,
>I met one guy who couldn't do the job he was supposed to be competent in, so that means nobody is capable to do their own job they have degrees for.
Also, I'm not talking about the opinion of random PhDs, but of the opinions of the top experts and professors in their own field. They're certainly not average and you can be damn sure they're competent.

>>58441487
>But it is possible to overcome this with exposure
No it is not.
Humans are NOT equal.
It is a fact.
Not changeable.
Not debatable.
Eternal.

There is nothing you could fight except nature itself.
And that is a lost cause.
Although you surly will try.

>There's a reason why big cities are left-leaning, and the knowledge of a harmonious culture-mixed society is a part of that.
Cities are leftleaning because the people there benefit from left leaning policies.
This should be obvious by the way.

File: d96.jpg (27KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x600px

>>58441549
>We got rid of all environmental inequalities that we possibly could.
>It didn't give the result you desired.
Silly goose, there you go again. You are ignoring the argument, stating your stance as fact, then going on a tangent to something unrelated. It's incredible, I'm in awe.

>>58441466
Yes living in mud huts and constant tribal warfare sounds simple.
What about Rhodesia?

>>58441566
Kingdom of dirt

>>58441630
>Cities are leftleaning because the people there benefit from left leaning policies.
How? Economically? Because the people are left-leaning socially as well, and I especially mean the white people.

>>58441484
>Most don't have a big/passionate enough fanbase to support them, and so they just close the website.
But you handed them one.
Even if they completely shut down there website.
You proofed there audience right.
They just saw the things they believed in attacked.
Do you not think that will strengthen them?

You didn't change there opinion, you convinced them that the things you stand against are right.
Their audience migrated away only becoming stronger in their belief.

>They'll just think it's the ad networks being greedy or some kind of mistake or something.
If they know how to host a website they know how to look at logs.

>>58441631
This whole thread is amazing. One anon mentioned his political targets, and the whole thread goes to absolute shit. Simply brilliant. Outstanding. Im in awe.

>>58441631
>Make argument
>Get non-argument in reply

Why don't you name the environmental variables we did not adjust?
It's not like my claims are unprovable or unattackable.

>>58441703
Neo /g is now /leftypol/ grampa.

>>58441524
>Is it because when left to their own devices they consistently fuck up everything in their own countries, buy weapons, and start bloody wars that would make Hitler shudder with terror?
Well they didn't exactly grow up in a civilized society. I wonder how you'd end up being had you been born there.

>>58441524
>Or the chief dictator just expels all white farmers because they're white, and then nobody produces food anymore, so everybody starves?
Mugabe is a retard, and nobody is capable of doing anything to stop him. That's why all this happens. there are many retards in white countries too. They just never get to that position of power.

>Or the ruling party just enjoys living in luxury spending foreign aid money on cars, drugs and hookers?
Whites and asians do that too.
Only whites stopped recently, because of their civilizations, but it's not really a race thing, as we've seen such behavior consistently with all races.

>Could it be because of that?
In (significant) part, yes.
Corrupt rulers take all the money from the country (which was given to them to promote growth), so they end up staying in poverty with no chance of getting out of it.

>>58441642
Whites came, built everything, then blacks got angry for their "country" being taken by blacks, leaving them only as second-class citizens, so they took everything from whites, but since blacks had no education, they weren't able to run the country.
It all stemmed from this bad decision (taken by the retard Mugabe and the uneducated black population that supported him).

>>58441684
>How? Economically?
As an example.
If you can afford to live inside the good parts of the cities you benifit from open borders bringing in cheap labour.
If you live in the poor parts you benefit from welfare.

People not living in the big cities are the lower working class.
Farmers, coal miners etc.

They do not benifit from cheap labour as it replaces them or atleast drives their wages down.

>>58439690
Basically this is correct. In the grand scheme of things the current winners are winning on a larger scale than the smaller agents can comprehend, much less compete on.

>>58441631
Minnesota school study. Give niglets as much money as whites (and then some) and they are still shit academically.

>>58441807
Fucking link it already, fuck

>>58441549
>I admit that it is irrelevant for all of us.
>Because we are both the oppressor and the oppressed and there is nothing to do about it.
So you admit people treat people of a different race differently.
Now consider that whites are the majority (while blacks are only 12/13%), and are in most positions of power, while blacks are rarely even in upper-middle class.
The result is that blacks end up being oppressed, and therefore don't have the same opportunities that whites do.

>We got rid of all environmental inequalities that we possibly could.
>It didn't give the result you desired.
>Going further requires the sacrifice of freedom.
Only legal-wise. Definitely not in society.

>Aside from human nature there is no inequality left.
Except in how the whole society treats people differently, and how certain groups grow up in certain cultures and environments, repeating the cycle that had them born there in the first place.

>>58441787
I was implying you need to give me an example ASIDE FROM economically dude. Why are white people in cities socially left-leaning?

>>58441825
I don't have my /pol meme folder handy, otherwise this thread would be over. Just google it.

>>58441698
Meh, I never saw any such discussion on those websites before they closed, so I have no reason to believe they think that they got attacked.

>>58441856
I did, got nothing.

>>58441826
>So you admit people treat people of a different race differently.
I admit that all people treat all other people differently there is no:
Whites always do X to blacks.
In this world.
People are not equal and they don't treat each other equaly this has (for many people) very little to do with race.
Most people "discriminate" on whether they enjoy being around other people.
Skin colour playes absolutely no role for the majority of the population.

>Except in how the whole society treats people differently, and how certain groups grow up in certain cultures and environments, repeating the cycle that had them born there in the first place.
Aka human nature.

>>58434640
>AdNauseam
meh I use pihole..

>>58441807
I remember reding something about that.
Also about the transracial adoption studies
It's because blacks are stuck in their "black culture" of ignorance where if you even read a book you're a piece of shit traitor uncle tom, so they prefer being hoodlums purely out of peer pressure, regardless of the money they have, or their parents (like kids listen to parents and not their peers, right?)

Look up Carol Dweck's book "Mindsets", and watch her Ted talk, where she talks about changing the mindset of these hood kids to turn them from worst school to some of the best students in the state (or country, don't remember).

>>58441884
Ill dump my folder when I get home if this thread is still alive.

>>58441862
It doesn't matter.
They know certainly that they were targeted because of their opinion, paranoia alone does that.
It doesn't matter whether it was a raging lefty or a ad agency.

They know that people exist who do not want them to believe what they are believing.
There is nothing in the world that could convince them more.

Absolutely nothing.

>>58441974
Sure thing. I have many reasons already why a black school would do worse than a white school with equal funding.

>>58441907
>People are not equal and they don't treat each other equaly this has (for many people) very little to do with race.
>Most people "discriminate" on whether they enjoy being around other people.
>Skin colour playes absolutely no role for the majority of the population.
You're making the mistake of looking at a group issue while considering it as an individual person issue.
What people do individually is irrelevant.
What's relevant is how the group is treated.
And blacks not only are born in a shittier situation most of the time, but are also offered WAY less opportunities for social mobility, because whites don't like to give them opportunities like they do to other whites.

>>58441974
>>58441989
Please don't. We're close to the bump limit and we're still discussing.
Post them somewhere else and paste the link here.

>>58434892
>he doesn't shoot himself in the head to build immunity for bullets

>>58441984
What I meant is that by reading the discussions in their comments and their "goodbye, we're closing shop" final posts, they didn't seem to think of it more than it being an unlucky thing that sometimes happens.

>>58441843
>ASIDE FROM economically
People vote with there pockets.
Whites in cities are left leaning because they are pretty good off and want to do good.
The German term is Gutmensch which is a perfect description.

They want to make the world a better place.
And equality seems like a noble goal, but it is not.
The leaders of communist revolutions aren't the working class.
They are people with seemingly noble goals who are fucking over the people below them for a "just" cause.

>>58441843
People in big cities tend to be educated, while people in more rural environments tend to be uneducated, and therefore have a different view of the world.

>>58441989
Not only that, but blacks raised in equal income houses as their white peers do worse. And black children raised by white parents do worse.

I just believe blacks are further behind evolutionary by a few thousand years.

Equality to a Republican means equal opportunity, while to a dem it means equal outcome.

>>58442027
Bump

>>58442053
>they didn't seem to think of it more than it being an unlucky thing that sometimes happens.
So what?
The owner probably did think that but it doesn't change anything, if they have no substantial claims it is probably best to leave it at that and just move to the next site.
It is probably less work for them to create something new as it was for you to shut them down.

But the people who are reading either migrated immediately and didn't think about it in which case you changed nothing.
Or they knew that something was not right, even the suspicious alone are enough to deepen there faith in their ideals.
In which case you created a hardened ideologue.

>>58442113
Minorities and immigrants wanting gibs

>>58442027
>What people do individually is irrelevant.
It is the only thing that matters.
If individuals are acting good so is the group.

>because whites don't like to give them opportunities like they do to other whites.
A baseless claim.
If you have to accuse billions of people of being racist for your arguments to make sense I can not take you seriously.

>>58442027
Bamp

>>58442141
I have many reasons for that too.

Your last paragraph is very wrong.

>>58442027
Bumparoonie

>>58442159
At least there's one website less where someone who's not "radicalized" might end up reading something that makes him radicalized.
I don't really care about those who are already convinced. I care about the diffusion of the ideology.

>>58442171
Not the majority of voters, obviously.

>>58442189
>A baseless claim.
On which you agree, since as you said here >>58441549 you believe both races oppress each other. All I'm saying is that whites are the only ones who are successful at it.

>If you have to accuse billions of people of being racist for your arguments to make sense I can not take you seriously.
It's just how society works.
Everyone sees people of a certain race as part of the group they're part of.
It's just that whites are in the position to oppress more than they're oppressed.

It seems like you're just arguing for the sake of arguing, and not to actually discuss a point, since you keep contraddicting yourself.

>>58441989
You can't just throw money at idiots and expect miracles to happen.

>>58442141
See >>58441959

>>58442189
where's the video of that chinese guy and the lazy as fuck niggers in africa?

>>58438468
>Like what? NEETs donating their welfare payments?

It seems to have worked for all these anime inspired kickstarters.

>>58442317
>>58442290
>>58442220
>>58441989
>>58441826
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wfg-DK1I1JE

>>58442317
>>58442374
Look up Empire of Dust on Youtube for the full thing.
I watched it and blacks were utterly shameful.
But how do you know it's genetic and not because they gtrew up in fucking Africa?
I mean, that's the worst possible place to grow up in. I wouldn't expect many geniuses to come from there.

>>58442301
If you think money doesn't affect quality of education and results you're delusional. It's not the only thing, but it absolutely makes a difference.

>>58442290
>At least there's one website less where someone who's not "radicalized" might end up reading something that makes him radicalized.
Haha.
You made no difference.
There is a limitless number of these sites any person would have found something similar instead.

If you truly wanted to make a difference you have to debate them.
Tell them why they are wrong.
How they contradict themselves.
How wrong their view on the world is.
You might have not changed many minds but planting the seed of doubt is often more then enough.

>On which you agree, since as you said here
I said that all people discriminate.
I did not in any way specify against whom.
Most People don't discriminate based on race.

>whites are the only ones who are successful at it.
Whites.
Are.
Not.
Successful.
At.
Oppressing.
Blacks.
If they were they would be failing extremely hard, as lives get progressively better for everyone.

>
It seems like you're just arguing for the sake of arguing, and not to actually discuss a point, since you keep contraddicting yourself.
I would say the same about you.

>>58442404
>If you think money doesn't affect quality of education and results you're delusional. It's not the only thing, but it absolutely makes a difference.
In Germany there is basically no private education.
Not even in Universities.

But there are 2 (or 3) different types of schools where children can go to after 4 (or 6) years.
The one which prepares you for university is almost exclusively visited by whites as they have the high grades necessary to go there (anyone can in theory independent of grades but that isn't recommended).

>>58434640
I block adverts because I don't want malware and ad tracking, if this fucking thing clicks on all adverts or even renders them on my machine then the risk increases - what needs to happen is something like pihole (custom dns server you self host that blocks adverts network wide) but instead of blocking them it only pulls them to the dns server, meaning I don't see them but the adverts still get loaded

>some one posted adnausem
>now google has to shit up the thread so we dont see that shit

>>58442392
Yeah, I look at the ones that grew up in the western world, and they hardly do better, no matter how wealthy they are.

>>58442475
>BUT THEM RACIST NAZI GERMANS !!!111!!
>THEY WON'T GIVE A BROTHER A CHANCE!!111!

>>58442514
>implying /g/ cares about shitty jewish apps
There are approved adblocks here and this crap doesn't fool us /g/oys.

>>58442406
>You made no difference.
>There is a limitless number of these sites any person would have found something similar instead.
>If you truly wanted to make a difference you have to debate them.
>Tell them why they are wrong.
>How they contradict themselves.
>How wrong their view on the world is.
>You might have not changed many minds but planting the seed of doubt is often more then enough.
Like I'm doing now?
I mean, why not both?

>Most People don't discriminate based on race.
Not openly, but I think without talking about it they do (at least subconsciusly).
I don't think there's any data to support any of our views on this issue, so we're probably not going to convince each other any time soon.

>Whites are not successful at oppressing blacks
I'm starting to think you and I have a different definition for "oppression".
They're not enslaving them or treating them like jews in Nazi Germany, but they're treating them differently, and that constitutes oppression for me, as it results in a non-equal amount (and quality) of opportunities being given to them.
Blacks do the same (and all the other groups too), but since they're the most hated race, they get offered less opportunities to grow (either by subtle racism, or because they grow up in the hood and can only become lowlife hoodlums that nobody wants to work with).

>>58442522
Those who grow up in normal families end up being normal people, like MKBHD or Ben Carson.
Too bad the majority of them is raised in a broken home and spends their formative years on the street learning (and wanting) to be a gangster instead of a well adjusted member of society (something which is seen as a bad thing in their community).

>>58440985
People with PhD's also depend on government funding to feed their family, why would they risk speaking out and losing their job. Clear bias in every single study that uses government funds to collect data and publish results. Not that bad for STEM, but when it starts getting subjective in sociology, politics and gender studies, It becomes a pretty big factor.

>>58442475
It's not about private school, though that certainly helps.

>>58442587
>Like I'm doing now?
>I mean, why not both?
Because one is completely ineffective and only furthers the cause of your enemy.

>they're treating them differently, and that constitutes oppression for me
That makes everyone oppressed and everyone a oppressor.
How could it not balance itself out?
And even if it didn't how would you fight it?

>because they grow up in the hood and can only become lowlife hoodlums that nobody wants to work with
How can you fight that?
This is the essential part of inequality.
Blacks are choosing a life that makes it very hard for them.
Is that the fault of white people?
Do you think anybody is happy about that and wouldn't want to change that if he had a chance?
But how could you?
Do you want to force the people from the hood into university against there will shouldn't they be granted the freedom to suffer or do you want to break up their communities and force them to integrate with whites?

I understand the problem but I believe the it has no real short term solution and what you are trying to do is wrong and will not lead to the desired goal.

People will not stop discriminating against each other and even if they did that would not stop the major problems.

>>58442783
There is no money involved in German education.
But there is still a very large difference between races.

>>58442786
You don't exactly choose to live like that. That life is hard to escape from for so many reasons. It's a negative feedback loop that spans generations.

>>58442813
>schools don't need funding
Do they go to fucking Hogwarts or something?

>>58442825
>You don't exactly choose to live like that.
Of course you don't.
But what could you do to stop them?
Force them?
Because surely if they wanted to change their lives they could do it.

>>58442838
There is no money in the education.
People don't pay the schools themselves, the state does.

That means that the school doesn't discriminate based on income.

The same goes for university.

>>58442786
>That makes everyone oppressed and everyone a oppressor.
>How could it not balance itself out?
Because one is more powerful (and numerous) than the other.

>And even if it didn't how would you fight it?
By making it so that people are conscious about the issue and are careful about the discrimination that they might be doing (deliberately or not), so they stop.

>How can you fight that?
By making it so that blacks don't grow up in that environment.

>This is the essential part of inequality.
Yes, and it comes from inequality of opportunity.
>Blacks are choosing a life that makes it very hard for them.
They're choosing it as little kids because it's all they know.
How would a 6yo black hoodlum who's raised by a single mother and spent most of his days on the street choose to be an intellectual when everyone around him taught him that it's a shameful thing to be?
It's almost impossbile.

>Is that the fault of white people?
No.
At least not directly.

>Do you think anybody is happy about that and wouldn't want to change that if he had a chance?
Do you mean blacks wanting to change their situation or whites wanting to change black's situation?
If it's the first, it's very hard for a number of reasons (thet don't know how, they've been brainwashed by hood culture into thinking it's shameful, they're being discriminated against, etc).
If the second, by raising awareness.

>But how could you?
>Do you want to force the people from the hood into university against there wil [etc.]
Neither of those.
There isn't a single thing you can do to fix such situation, but you have to employ a mix of different tactics, such as better schooling for their kids (again, check out Carol Dweck's Ted talk), and promote different values (because all they're exposed to from the media is nigger values from nigger rappers), invest in the hood, etc.
The change has to coem from them, so change the fundamental issues causing them to act in such stupid ways, so they fix themselves.

>>58442813
Do blacks tend to come from a similar social background as whites?
Do you think the fact that they tend to come from worse situations might have an effect on their being morons rather than good students who study and prioritize being good citizens/people instead of being morons?

>>58442998
>tl;dr blacks are stupid because it's in their culture
Pretty much either that or genes.

>>58442905
The state doesn't discriminate but some schools need more than others to get on equal footing.

>>58442869
>Because surely if they wanted to change their lives they could do it.
Nope

File: mixing.jpg (2MB, 2696x3477px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2696x3477px

commencing dump

File: MAOA.jpg (153KB, 568x1100px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 568x1100px

>>58443391

File: serial.png (81KB, 668x621px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 668x621px

>>58443413

File: Race_myths.gif (861KB, 2406x1936px) Image search: [Google]

861KB, 2406x1936px

>>58443447

>>58443346
That's why they are paid per student, you idiot.

File: meltingpot.jpg (339KB, 1276x997px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 1276x997px

>>58443467

>thread about a tracking obfuscator
>thread turns into mini-/pol/

File: homicide.jpg (28KB, 536x392px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 536x392px

>>58443490

>thread about interesting ad blocker idea
>ruined by politicstards

The sooner you start realising your "sides" mean fuck all, and the only things that matter are the personal values that *you yourself* uphold, the sooner you'll be a worthwhile human being.

File: 58434640.png (98KB, 1190x776px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1190x776px

Now that the thread is dying (and the guy started dumping) and we'll all abandon the discussion, I have to say it was prety interesting and kept me entertained for some otherwise boring 8 hours.
Mostly because my first post (>>58437347) was just an attempt at enraging some of you with some stupid troll, but you guys took the bait and I kept responding because it was fun.

It wasn't even the first time I posted it, but the first one (>>58194261) went unnoticed.
Maybe it was a tad too obvious or was in an obscure thread.

Being right-wing myself (and not even American or white) it was very interesting to force myself to think and reason like my "opposites" and see these issues from their point of view.
I started with stupid rage-baiting replies and gradually moved to serious answers (while still trying to hold back my real arguments in favor of those I would use if I were a leftist). This allowed me to see the issues in a more nuanced way, and while I'm still very right-wing, I now have "augmented" my views with ideas from the left that I hadn't considered before actually forcing myself to think like them and seing where they come from.

I'm definitely doing this again when I have time.

Also, American education must be mediocre at best, if even I (a high-school dropout who learned English on YouTube and 4chan) can pass as a college student/graduate, kek.

Here's a full-page screenshot of my replies (PDF because FireShot can only save to that without making the page impossible to read):
http://www69.zippyshare.com/v/6SY3Vvp8/file.html

File: MOA2.png (131KB, 726x618px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 726x618px

>>58443509

>>58443475
It's not just number of students.

>>58443516
>Here's a full-page screenshot of my replies (PDF because FireShot can only save to that without making the page impossible to read)

yo dumbass

shift+f2
screenshot --fullpage dicks.png

File: cranial.png (198KB, 1142x896px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1142x896px

>>58443516
YES ABANDON THE THREAD WHEN FACTS AND STUDIES SHOW UP

>>58443551
Shit, didn't know about that

>>58443554
Lol

File: 635880546709691967256903253_seinfeld20funny1.jpg (34KB, 500x418px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x418px

>>58443391
>Hey guys what do you think of this ad blocker?
>GAS THE KIKES END NIGGER DEGENERACY

File: gibs.png (792KB, 1240x1142px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 1240x1142px

>>58443554

>>58443554
Isn't this a thread about a forked version of uBlock? Why are you dumping white supremacist propaganda?

File: murder3.jpg (61KB, 599x733px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 599x733px

>>58443589

>>58443573
>>58443590
he's just as bad as a sjw and doesnt even realize it.

File: minnesota.jpg (173KB, 843x843px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 843x843px

>>58443590
No its a thread about how to use technology to silence political opponents. 85% of the responses have been political.

Heres the Minnesota study

File: prison.jpg (179KB, 1024x789px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1024x789px

>>58443638
and another

this is the end, Ill leave now. I fully expect a ban so I need to unteather and make other arrangements.

>>58443676
Appreciate the effort, but I'm probably the only one you're trying to convince here, and I'm already convinced

>>58434640
Good idea, but I doubt a simple ajax request will suffice for ad to register.

>>58434935
It's just a impotent tactic. Try fighting Obama or hillary with that tactic. It's a stupid tactic

>>58439053
>he does not know how ad providers work
if its a small site then they will just ban it. at least thats what google does. im sure that you can read about that on many sites if you use a search engine.