Name ONE good OS.
OS X 10.6.8
inb4 templeOS
>>58429276
ur mum
>>58429276
Windows 10 :^)
GNU/Gentoo
OS/2 Warp
win 7
>>58429276
DOS
TempleOS
Literally perfect
>>58429276
Solus
>>58429345
Advanced tools, simple and easy to navigate, not dumbed down too much. Functional.
I feel like Win2k was their peak. Everything after was just worse. I hated having to move on to XP.
Especially the control panel was easier to use on Win2k I thought.
Botnet OS
>>58429655
Yeah, especially when coming from win 98 or god forbid ME it was just an amazing experience to finally have such a rock solid and functional OS.
>>58429276
For it's time, Windows XP
Win10 is great actually.
>>58429712
Don't you ever get tired of shilling?
>>58429699
Literally just a dumbed down mom-friendly 2k, was barely even usable before SP2.
>>58429607
>Kevinpost
Linux Mint Cinnamon x64. I use it and so does my grandma. Zero issues in both cases.
>>58429699
>For it's time
Where I lived, everyone loved to hate on XP. It was like how people hated on Vista. Was it like that everywhere? I knew several people that did all they could so they could keep using Win98se and/or Win2k. Even in 2004.
Every OS is shit. GNU/Linux is less shit, but still shit.
>>58429727
To be honest, I have no idea what are you trying to imply here. You do look stupid, though.
>>58429727
Why do you keep posting this? Literally what point are you even trying to make?
>>58429276
dumb frogposter
>>58429276
>>MUTHAFUCKING ARCH
SeL4. I mean seriously it's formalized verified down to the assembly code. What more do you want?
RISC OS
>>58429816
>>58429823
Are you to too blinded to see how the font rendering went to trash?
>>58429875
Hmm?
>>58429888
Notice you blur?
>>58429938
No?
>>58429965
Retard, you are comparing your fonts with your own
>>58429984
That's exactly my point. Only you have this problem. Looks fine for me.
>>58429276
Temple OS
>>58429998
I'm comparing your fonts with mine here >>58429938
you are comparing your font with your own here >>58429965
You are not mentally handicapped, are you?
>>58430032
And I'm telling you you're a fucking retard. Did you think everyone was affected by this when you posted it?
This on you to figure out, and if you're expecting /g/ to be your personal tech support in this situation, you can fuck right off.
>>58430054
>Did you think everyone was affected by this when you posted it?
I've seen better damage control than this hahaha
Debian 8
>>58429276
systemd
>>58430200
So hilarious and original
BIOS
It may not be great but it's better than everything else
>>58429276
WES7 hands down
>>58430224
Go away, Lennart.
IOS
>>58429276
Windows 2000
Ubuntu 17.04
>>58429286
/thread
Atari MiNT
>>58429699
for its time, XP was a shitfest of BSOD and incompatibility.
now, its okay as there have been many fixes. But for its time it was fucking disgusting.
ITT: Computer janitors argue about which toilet is the most fun to clean
>>58429330
you name a good one then
>>58429276
Urbit :3
>>58429276
gahnoo slash leenuks
Fedora has been perfect for me from first install on my x220. Not a single driver issue, not one hiccup, not one glitch. Absolutely perfect
>>58429875
Looks like mmc no longer declares itself as dpi-aware and opts into the system 2x bilinear filter instead.
Reasonably normal choice to make if it had hardcoded any pixel offsets, reasonably normal thing to happen for old raw-win32 / MFC / WTL software.
I'm assuming they bent over to support some bigco's compatibility constraint seeing as mmc can host a lot of third-party controls.
Mac hOmoSeX
>>58429276
Plan9
>>58430098
this
>>58432351
>Unironically encouraging the use of selinux: the distro
>>58429337
Genera
>>58429276
Windows 7 Professional-Ultimate
Linux
>>58429838
i came here to post this
>>58429938
you are fucking retarded, its your image rendering that is making the image blurry
>>58429276
Arch Linux
NT 3.51
Really stable, and it supported many of the programs 95 ran.
>>58429276
There are none, depending what you need some just suck less for a particular job.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d85p7JZXNy8
>>58429295
>>58429337
>>58430022
This is actually probably the least controversial answer on this board.