vlc

>>58420799
That's like the least of the problems on VLC.

>>58420851
I actually wanted to discuss the intelligence of the OP in the image.

>>58420971
He's an idiot. Much like yourself for thinking the intelligence of an application's user base has anything to do with the quality of the application itself.

Hes right, VLC really needs an integrated icon editor

>>58421047
>for thinking the intelligence of an application's user base has anything to do with the quality of the application itself.
But I use vlc, I like it. I wanted to change the cone icon in the middle of the player when it's not playing anything when I came across this(found it btw). I didn't say anything about the quality of vlc in my post.

It 'just werks' for simple video playback.

Honestly I can't find any reason to use it over MPV or MPC-HC. Maybe if you have some abstract video files to play, but beyond that idk

>>58421097
So you just wanted to start a blog discussion?
faggot

Bitches don't even remember the time before libass was added to VLC.

People used it and claimed to like it when it was total and utter shit for softsubs.

(before fall 2008)

MPlayer and MPC-HC were years ahead of VLC (like always).

its stupid reasoning just use it if you like it why does it matter how the icon looks? when did the world become so fashion over function?

>>58421354
>internal codecs

>>58421354
>soft subs

>implying anyone cares about its ability to play anime

File: i-forgive-you-for-using-vlc-to-open-me-~nemo-3480598.png (170KB, 500x760px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 500x760px

>>58421260
If you like artifacts

File: 1481532083394.png (19KB, 931x969px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 931x969px

>>58420799
One of the reasons I started using Arch was the nice logo desu...

>>58420799
On some programs you can change icons with resource hacker if written in delphi.