> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug .cgi?id=736660 Lol

File: 1422230815574.jpg (75KB, 784x680px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 784x680px

>>58416092
>shitnux
Gee, what a surprise that shit is breaking. Golly, I never saw that coming.

>>58416143
Be fair. Winblows and Crapple are awful too.

>>58416143
>weebshit pretending to talk about tech
100 bucks say you are a low IQ mactoddler, in which case you should go back to >>>/fa/ or >>>/lgbt/

>>58416092
It started as a gnu project, you shouldn't expect quality software from them.
every day is worse than the precedent as I discover widely used softwares maintain by only a few developers on their spare time.
for example gimp:
https://www.gimp.org/news/2016/07/13/gimp-2-9-4-released/
>GIMP 2.9.2 was released on November 27, 2015. Since then, the work to reach GIMP 2.9.4 was done in 1348
>commits, making an average of 5.9 commits a day, of which 894 are (mostly) code-related, 241 are icon-related,
>and 213 are translation updates.

>As usual, the GIMP team is small yet as dedicated as ever: more than a third of the commits
>have been done by Michael Natterer (514), the next biggest contributors being Jehan Pagès (192)
>and Klaus Staedtler (187). The three of them represent 66% of all commits.

3 guys literally did 2/3 of the work, Adobe must be freaking out atm...

>>58416092
>freetards will defend this

>>58416092
>> If You are not a KDE man, you are not fit for life.

>>58416484
most of the time GNU software focuses on localization instead of actual functionality