980 ti Vs R9 Fury X ReLive Driver Update

>>58414539
>>>/v/

>>58414608
;^)

>>58414539
You make it? Not bad.

>>58414539
>OC vs no OC

Mins/Avg seems to favor 980ti

>>58414539
*possession

Wait so is the relive driver update a big deal? Are your results better compared to the previous Crimson driver?

>>58415157
ReLive is not a perf update (or even bugfix for tat matter, there were regressions in both areas).

It was some power trimming/frame capping thing that nobody cares about, and mostly the addition of an uncucked and infinitesimally lower overhead version of ShadowPlay.

>>58415281
>frame capping
If it is what I'm thinking of that's a good thing. Games where you sit on 1000fps in the menu while your GPU fans are going nuts are annoying.

>>58414961
''no stable oc possible''

>>58414865
yeah I made this.

>>58415281
Eh, the GPU is better now than it was before. So it's kind of a big deal.

>>58415548
Thats the problem beside the 4 GB. I need 4.5 GB average in BF1 and it can hit 5.5 GB after a few hours. Also 980 Ti and 1070 do insane amounts of OC. I think a stock 980 was around 16K Firestrike GPU score, a 1500 MHz Ti / 2100 MHz 1070 does around 21000.

>>58414539
>+200 core
Just write out the final boost clock. Different cards boost to different states by default.

>>58418181
>nigger games

>>58418181
The graphics settings across the games were as close to comparable as possible and I never saw the Fury X have any VRAM issues (Even in BF1). VRAM is very transient in my experiences and isn't a hard cap like it was in the past.

Also your statements about Maxwell overclocking are close to accurate but ultimately wrong.

The stock 980 could barely get over 13000 firestrike in most cases, 980 Ti when heavily OC'd could get upwards of 16k.

The stats your quoting would likely be with SLI 980 Tis.

I've tested my 980 Ti in Firestrike (The 1080p version) many times.